Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
July 22, 2002 Vol. 3 No. 15:   


Published: 07/22/2002

Printable Version
Email to a Friend




Appropriations and Supplemental Spending Bill Update

Negotiations between the House and Senate on the FY 2002 supplemental spending bill (H.R. 4775) broke down after the White House threatened to veto the bill if spending was much more than the $28.8 billion requested by the President and consisted primarily of spending for defense and national security and aid to New York City.

Appropriators had agreed on at $30.4 billion supplemental. Ironically, in order to cut costs, the conference agreement finally reached on July 19th completely cut funding for the Workforce Investment Act (to restore the rescission of funding for dislocated workers passed last July and to provide additional funds for National Emergency Grants)—funding that the President had requested, and the House and Senate had both approved.

It is likely that the same Presidential veto threat against “excess” spending will make the appropriations process as a whole even more difficult than usual. The House is operating under its own budget resolution limiting appropriations to $759 billion to be divided among the thirteen spending bills. The Senate has not passed a budget resolution, but there has been agreement for discretionary spending in the amount of $768 billion. Besides the funding level discrepancies and the threat of Presidential veto, the creation of the “Department of Homeland Security” will likely cause more delays as appropriation committee jurisdiction is determined.