HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
June 16, 2003 Vol. 4 No. 12:   


Published: 06/16/2003

Printable Version
Email to a Friend




EPA Study Finds Water Polluters Not Penalized

An internal EPA study shows that 25 percent of major industrial facilities are in significant noncompliance with permits issued under the Clean Water Act, the majority of which receive little or no disciplinary action, according to the Washington Post.

The study, which uses data from the Permit Compliance System (PCS), focused on major facilities, defined as those that discharge at least one million gallons per day. Out of the 6,652 facilities examined, EPA found 1,670 in significant noncompliance. For the year 2001, 50 percent of violators exceeded the limit for toxics by 100 percent, and 13 percent were over by 1000 percent. For conventional pollutants, 33 percent of violators exceeded their discharge permits by 100 percent, and 5 percent by over 1000 percent.

Given the large number of violators, EPA’s enforcement has been severely lacking. In the last two years, EPA took enforcement action against only 24 percent of those in significant noncompliance, 27 percent in “repeat significant noncompliance,” and 32 percent in “perpetual significant noncompliance.” Less than half of these violators ended up paying fines, which averaged a paltry $6000.

The report, completed in February by the Office of Enforcement and Compliance, is the first comprehensive examination of EPA’s failure to enforce the Clean Water Act, and was undertaken to develop a “performance-based” assessment of compliance. The U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG) issued two reports in 2002 (here and here) that contained similar findings to the EPA report. J.P. Suarez, EPA’s assistant administrator for enforcement and compliance assurance, told the Post that the agency is trying to be more aggressive in monitoring state agencies, which handle most enforcement cases.