Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
July 14, 2003 Vol. 4 No. 14:   


Published: 07/14/2003

Printable Version
Email to a Friend




Proposal to Cut Overtime Pay Elicits Huge Response

More than 75,000 people have written to the Department of Labor (DOL) in response to its proposed changes to overtime standards -- the most mail the agency has received on any similar issue in at least a decade, according to the Washington Post.


DOL’s proposed changes, issued March 31, 2003, would significantly alter current overtime rules -- stripping eight million workers of their right to time-and-a-half pay for hours worked beyond 40 in a single week, according to a recent analysis by the Economic Policy Institute.

More than 100 workers gathered outside DOL headquarters on June 30, the final day of the agency’s public comment period, to protest the proposal. Unions had rented a room at DOL weeks in advance -- planning a rally and news conference -- but agency officials reneged on the deal just days beforehand, denying the group the space.

The White House has further responded to this intense opposition by threatening a veto of the Fiscal Year 2004 Labor-HHS appropriations bill if an amendment is added blocking the overtime changes. The threat may have proven critical since an amendment by Reps. David Obey (D-WI) and George Miller (D-CA) to block the DOL rules failed on a 213-210 vote.

DOL will now review public comments and could issue final standards as early as this fall.