The Estate Tax and Charitable
Giving:
State-by-State Analysis
By John S. Irons
Summary
Research has shown that
eliminating the estate tax would have a significant negative impact on giving
to charitable organizations. Using
state-level data on charitable revenue, this report estimates the state-by-state
loss in charitable giving that would result from a full elimination of the
estate tax.
For the nation as a whole, estate
tax elimination would have reduced charitable giving in 2001 by an estimated
$10 billion. On average, states would
have lost $187 million in annual charitable giving, with larger states losing
considerable more.
This reduction in charitable
giving represents an annual reduction of nearly $39,000 per charity filing with
the IRS. Across states, New York would
have lost the most per filing charity, nearly $77,000, while Wyoming would lose
the least, at 6,800 per filing charity.
Larger organizations and those charities that rely more heavily on
bequest giving would likely lose substantially more from estate tax
elimination.
Introduction
According to studies using data on IRS filings and a wide range of
econometric research, the estate tax has been found to significantly encourage
charitable giving. Since the estate tax
allows for a charitable deduction at death, a repeal of the estate tax would
mean the removal of a tax incentive for giving. Evidence supports the idea that people are aware of the tax
implications of charitable giving at death, and that they change their giving
patterns, both at death and during their lives, as a result of the estate
tax.
Results from a new and comprehensive study estimate that a repeal of the
estate tax would result in a drop in charitable giving nationwide through
bequests and lifetime giving by approximately $10 billion annually. The study estimates a decline in charitable
bequests ranging from 22 percent to 37 percent.[1] In 2001, there were $16.2 billion in
charitable bequests; thus, repeal would have meant a loss of between $3.6
billion and $6.0 billion in charitable bequests in 2001. In addition, changes in the estate tax
affect lifetime charitable giving since this type of giving also reduces estate
tax liability. The amount of the
reduction in lifetime giving is estimated to be approximately equal to the
amount of the reduction in estate giving – about $5 billion.
This approximate total reduction of $10 billion in charitable giving is
roughly equivalent to the annual giving of the largest 110 US foundations
combined.
This short report estimates the impact an estate tax repeal would have on
individual states.
State-by-state estimates
According to an analysis by the National Center for Charitable
Statistics there were 246,112 charities (501(c)(3) organizations) across the
United States who filed a return with the IRS (Form 990s) in 2000.[2] These organizations receive revenue from
individual contributions, estate bequests, government grants, and other
sources. As noted above, in 2001 estate
tax bequests totaled $16.2 billion.
Using information on the distribution of nonprofit revenue across states
as well as national average bequest share of total nonprofit revenue, we can
compute an estimate of the state-by-state amount of charitable giving that
would be lost if the estate tax were repealed.[3]
By using the distribution of nonprofit revenue across states,
rather than estimates of bequests, we are better able to determine the impact
on nonprofits by state without assuming that bequests stay in the same state as
the decedent.
Figure 1 shows the source of revenue for nonprofits. Private contributions are 19.9% of total
revenues. Of these private
contributions, 7.5% are in the form of charitable bequests.[4] Tables 1 and 2 show the state-by-state
distribution of nonprofit revenue, estimated charitable bequests, the estimated
amount of charitable bequests that would have been lost in 2001, as well as the
total loss in charitable giving due to a repeal of the estate tax. Nationwide, per filing charity, each
organization would lose, on average, nearly $39,000 in giving each year – with
larger organizations, and those dependent on charitable bequests, losing
significantly more.
It is worth noting two caveats to the numbers reported here. While these findings do not assume that
bequest giving must stay in-state, actual reduction in giving may differ from
those produced here to the extent that charities across states may rely more or
less heavily on revenues from bequest giving and giving by those likely to be
subject to the estate tax. In addition,
to the extent that states revise (or eliminate) their own state-level estate
tax laws in response to federal changes, there may be additional effects in
individual states.
Finally, there are many reasons to believe that these
estimates are too low. There may be a
psychological impact created by a message that charitable giving at death
through estate tax incentives is no longer encouraged. The estate tax benefit of charitable giving,
which is a “selling point” for charities, will no longer be available as an added
incentive for giving. In addition, the
removal of the need for estate tax planning prior to death lessens the
opportunity to introduce potential givers to charities and foundations.
For more information on the effect of estate tax on charitable giving
see OMB Watch’s “The Estate Tax and Charitable Giving.”[5] For more information on estate tax issues,
visit the Americans for a Fair Estate Tax website (http://www.fairestatetax.org).

Source:
Independent Sector (1997 data, left chart, http://www.independentsector.org/PDFs/inbrief.pdf),
AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy/Giving USA 2003 (2002 data, right chart, http://www.aafrc.org/bysourceof.html).
Table 1.
State-by-State Impact of the Estate Tax Repeal on Charitable Bequests
(2001, Dollars in Millions)
|
State
|
Number of Organizations
(filing IRS Form 990 in
2000)[6]
|
Total Bequests[7]
|
Loss in Bequest Giving (Range) [8]
|
Total Loss (Annual Giving
plus Bequest Giving)[9]
|
|
US
Totals
|
246,112
|
$16,200.0
|
$3,564 - $5,994
|
$9,558
|
|
Alaska
|
1,021
|
27.8
|
6.1 - 10.3
|
16.4
|
|
Alabama
|
2,839
|
118.3
|
26.0 - 43.8
|
69.8
|
|
Arizona
|
3,307
|
168.4
|
37.0 - 62.3
|
99.3
|
|
Arkansas
|
1,914
|
103.4
|
22.7 - 38.2
|
61.0
|
|
California
|
28,499
|
1,732.4
|
381.1 - 641.0
|
1,022.1
|
|
Colorado
|
4,780
|
162.5
|
35.8 - 60.1
|
95.9
|
|
Connecticut
|
4,100
|
325.7
|
71.6 - 120.5
|
192.1
|
|
DC
|
3,285
|
290.3
|
63.9 - 107.4
|
171.3
|
|
Delaware
|
921
|
45.7
|
10.1 - 16.9
|
27.0
|
|
Florida
|
10,040
|
566.3
|
124.6 - 209.5
|
334.1
|
|
Georgia
|
5,182
|
359.3
|
79.0 - 132.9
|
212.0
|
|
Hawaii
|
1,223
|
82.6
|
18.2 - 30.6
|
48.7
|
|
Idaho
|
942
|
23.4
|
5.1 - 8.7
|
13.8
|
|
Illinois
|
10,058
|
759.7
|
167.1 - 281.1
|
448.2
|
|
Indiana
|
5,324
|
369.6
|
81.3 - 136.7
|
218.1
|
|
Iowa
|
3,095
|
137.3
|
30.2 - 50.8
|
81.0
|
|
Kansas
|
2,631
|
104.2
|
22.9 - 38.6
|
61.5
|
|
Kentucky
|
2,914
|
163.7
|
36 - 60.6
|
96.6
|
|
Louisiana
|
2,668
|
133.9
|
29.5 - 49.5
|
79.0
|
|
Maine
|
1,787
|
92.1
|
20.3 - 34.1
|
54.4
|
|
Maryland
|
5,425
|
367.1
|
80.8 - 135.8
|
216.6
|
|
Massachusetts
|
8,347
|
847.0
|
186.3 - 313.4
|
499.7
|
|
Michigan
|
7,498
|
551.8
|
121.4 - 204.2
|
325.5
|
|
Minnesota
|
5,834
|
333.3
|
73.3 - 123.3
|
196.7
|
|
Missouri
|
4,883
|
345.0
|
75.9 - 127.7
|
203.6
|
|
Mississippi
|
1,480
|
68.8
|
15.1 - 25.5
|
40.6
|
|
Montana
|
1,347
|
41.0
|
9.0 - 15.2
|
24.2
|
|
Nebraska
|
1,941
|
107.2
|
23.6 - 39.7
|
63.3
|
|
Nevada
|
950
|
23.2
|
5.1 - 8.6
|
13.7
|
|
New
Hampshire
|
1,584
|
86.6
|
19.1 - 32.0
|
51.1
|
|
New
Jersey
|
6,847
|
507.5
|
111.6 - 187.8
|
299.4
|
|
New
Mexico
|
1,792
|
49.6
|
10.9 - 18.3
|
29.2
|
|
New
York
|
18,985
|
2,470.9
|
543.6 - 914.2
|
1,457.8
|
|
North
Carolina
|
6,676
|
357.2
|
78.6 - 132.2
|
210.7
|
|
North
Dakota
|
902
|
63.7
|
14.0 - 23.6
|
37.6
|
|
Ohio
|
10,926
|
626.6
|
137.9 - 231.8
|
369.7
|
|
Oklahoma
|
2,665
|
117.1
|
25.8 - 43.3
|
69.1
|
|
Oregon
|
3,966
|
131.2
|
28.9 - 48.5
|
77.4
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|