Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
December 1, 2004 Vol.5, No.24:   


Published: 11/30/2004

Printable Version
Email to a Friend

See article Court Narrows Faith-Based Suit also in this issue.


White House Rejects Overtime Rules Amendments

In both versions of the FY 2005 Labor-HHS spending bill, the House and Senate approved amendments intended to block the White House from implementing new and harmful overtime rules. Those amendments, sponsored by Rep. David Obey (D-WI) and Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), would have reinstated old overtime eligibility rules for some workers, and were seen as a major victory for labor.

Although the amendments were successfully passed in October, a conference committee deleted the language from the bill during last week's lame-duck session because the White House threatened to veto the entire omnibus spending package if it included such amendments. Read more about overtime rules and the economic effects of changing them in a briefing paper from the Economic Policy Institute.

While it can be considered a theoretical victory that both Houses supported the amendments, it is a significant loss that they were ultimately stripped from the spending bill. However, when the appropriations process is reduced to Congress passing most of the bills through an omnibus, it is not surprising important policy amendments do not receive the attention they deserve. For more on this, read this Washington Post article.