Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
February 22, 2005 Vol.6, No.4:   


Published: 02/22/2005

Printable Version
Email to a Friend

See NAACP Says IRS Summons Illegal, Politically Motivated

IRS Examination of NAACP Exempt Status Based on Criticism of Bush Policies




Inspector General Reports on IRS Review of Charities' Partisan Activity

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) has published its evaluation of the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) process for reviewing referrals alleging illegal political campaign intervention by charities. It describes the process used in detail, and said it found no indications that the random sample of cases it reviewed were handled inappropriately. The IRS requested the review after its audit of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), announced shortly before the election, raised questions about political motivation. The review did not specify whether the NAACP was included in the random sample of cases it reviewed.

Review of the Exempt Organizations Function Process for Reviewing Alleged Political Campaign Intervention by Tax Exempt Organizations describes a Political Intervention Project (PIP) established in June 2004 to “fast track” referrals and prevent recurring violations by groups exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the tax code. A three-person committee reviewed the cases and decided which should be referred for further action.

Of the 131 cases the PIP committee reviewed, 10 were dismissed because they did not involve partisan political activities. Of the remaining 121 cases, the committee found that 80 warranted further investigation based on a “reasonable belief” that a violation may have occurred or that examination would lead to discovery of a violation. Of these 80 organizations, 34 are religious. The report found that slightly more pro-Republican groups than pro-Democratic groups were in the pool selected for further investigation.

The report did not address whether the IRS has the authority to “fast track” these cases absent a flagrant violation of the ban on partisan activity by charities. The NAACP has refused to respond to a summons in its examination, saying the law requires a finding of flagrant violation before expedited review.