Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
Federal Budget:   


Published: 03/21/2005

Printable Version
Email to a Friend


House, Senate Pass Irresponsible FY06 Budget Resolutions

The House and Senate passed separate versions of the fiscal year 2006 (FY06) budget resolution last week that would allow for additional tax cuts, mostly targeting wealthy families, while cutting back on spending for programs that serve middle- and low-income America. A split within the GOP ranks may spell trouble for reconciling the two budget resolutions, and, as with the current year, would mean Congress would operate without a budget blueprint.

The House GOP has been very critical of the Senate version of the budget resolution because it did not cut spending deeply enough. Two amendments adopted on the Senate floor March 17 only increased the contempt of the House. Sen. Gordon Smith’s (R-OR) amendment to protect the Medicaid program from $15 billion in cuts and Sen. Ted Kennedy’s (D-MA) amendment to raise the discretionary spending ceiling by $5.4 billion will be major obstacles to be negotiated during the conference committee and may threaten the bill entirely.

Both resolutions are fiscally irresponsible and threaten the fiscal health of the United States. By solidifying large deficits for years to come, the Senate budget resolution would further weaken the ability of the federal government to meet the great variety of spending priorities affecting millions of Americans in communities across the country.

The chart below summarizes the major aspects of the bills.

For more detailed information on the budget resolution debates in the House and Senate, read these analyses: