Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
July 11, 2005 Vol.6, No.14:   


Published: 07/11/2005

Printable Version
Email to a Friend

See more about the 527 bills

The Chairman's Mark for H.R. 513


Update on 527 bills

Two campaign finance bills, one that would allow more contributions to political parties and the other to restrict contributions to 527 organizations, are headed for a vote in the House. One bill has implications for charities that wish to make issue advocacy communications that mention federal candidates during election season.

On Wednesday, June 29, the House Administration Committee held a markup of H.R. 513, the 527 Reform Act of 2005. The legislation, which would subject independent 527 organizations to the same restrictions as political parties and campaigns, was voted out of committee on a party-line 5-3 vote without a recommendation for passage.

House Administration Committee Chairman Bob Ney (R-OH), has indicated his preference for H.R. 1316, the 527 Fairness Act (Pence-Wynn), which would allow the political parties to raise more money to compete with independent political groups. He used the hearing to criticize Democratic support of unregulated independent political groups. Democrats have come out against both the 527 Reform Act and the 527 Fairness Act, and Ney is eager to send them both to the floor and force the Democrats to choose between the bills, forcing them to choose between regulating 527 organizations or allowing political parties to raise more money.

An amendment proposed by Rep. Chris Shays (R-CT) would exempt 527 organizations that are engaged entirely in state election activity, even if they conducted get-out-the-vote efforts, as long as those campaigns did not mention federal candidates. The amendment also passed by a party-line 5-3 vote.

The Pence-Wynn bill was sent to the floor earlier this month without the support of any Democrat on the House Administration Committee.

Most worrisome for nonprofits is that the Pence-Wynn bill would allow various types of nonprofit organizations, such as social action groups (501(c)(4)), labor unions (501(c)(5)) and trade associations (501(c)(6)) organizations, to make electioneering communications but does not address 501(c)(3) organizations or unpaid broadcasts. The anomalous situation created by such legislation could result in a ban on broadcasts close to elections for the most nonpartisan of nonprofits, charities, while allowing broadcasts by more partisan groups, such as labor unions and trade associations. This could create a virtual blackout of nonpartisan, non-electoral advocacy communications by nonprofits.

The House is expected to take up the Pence-Wynn bill before the August recess; however, it is unlikely that any campaign finance legislation will emerge from Congress this year. Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) has said that he does not intend to clear floor time for a 527 bill this session. Additionally, with appropriations bills and one definite Supreme Court nominee confirmation debate, the possibility of a conference committee to resolve the issue seems slim.