Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
February 7, 2006 Vol. 7, No. 3:   


Published: 02/07/2006

Printable Version
Email to a Friend

Related Links:

Concern Grows Over Unauthorized Domestic Spying, OMB Watcher [Jan. 11, 2006]

Statement on Bush's Unauthorized Domestic Spying By Gary D. Bass, OMB Watch [Dec. 20, 2005]

Center for Democracy and Technology Resource Center

Gonzales' Responses to Questions from Chairman Specter


Update: Criticism of Domestic Spying Remains Steady

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales defended the Bush administration's policy of warrantless domestic surveillance before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Feb. 6. The administration's authorization of warrantless eavesdropping by the National Security Agency (NSA) on international calls of U.S. citizens has come under fire since news of the program was first leaked to the press in December 2005.

Gonzales defended the legality of the program to committee members, including Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-PA), who challenged the NSA domestic spying, arguing federal law "has a forceful and blanket prohibition against any electronic surveillance without a court order."

Specter went on to suggest that the special court established by the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) review the legality of the NSA program.

In addition to the legal scrutiny it has received, the NSA program has recently been faulted for its apparent lack of efficacy. According to intelligence sources interviewed by the Washington Post, nearly all of the thousands of international calls by Americans that were subject to NSA eavesdropping turned out to be investigative dead ends.

The Post article notes that the program impacts many more individuals than those 5,000 or so who had their phone calls recorded, as "[c]omputer controlled systems collect and sift basic information about hundreds of thousands of faxes, e-mails and telephone calls into and out of the United States before selecting the ones for scrutiny by human eyes and ears." The program, it seems, has resulted in little more than the accumulation of enormous amounts of data about harmless communications that is stored by the federal government.