HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
May 2, 2006 Vol. 7, No. 9:   


Published: 05/02/2006

Printable Version
Email to a Friend

The PART and the FY06 Budget (.pdf)

The PART and the FY07 Budget (.pdf)

Analysis of 141 Programs From FY 2007 Budget

Background and Criticism of the Program Assessment Rating Tool




White House Misleads Public, Congress on PART Results

In each of the past two years, President Bush has publicly cited a group of 100-plus federal programs in his State of the Union address that he wishes to eliminate or drastically reduce because they are "not getting results." Yet, over two-thirds of these programs have not even been reviewed by the administration's own tool for determining results: the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART).

Unfortunately, this is just one indication of the administration's biased use of the PART, which, along with positive spin on performance and results, is used to drum up support for its pre-ordained ideological goals. OMB Watch has prepared two new fact sheets de-bunking the myth that the PART and the president's "objective" performance and results data are the basis for the president's budget proposals. The fact sheets conclude:

    There is little evidence in the budget submissions of the past two years to support the presidential rhetoric that results are the basis of funding decisions. The president's rhetorical focus on performance and results seem to be just that--merely a smokescreen providing political cover for a Bush agenda that seeks to promote particular ideological policies while drastically reducing the size of the federal government.