Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
June 13, 2006 Vol. 7, No. 12:   


Published: 06/13/2006

Printable Version
Email to a Friend




Chemical Security: Moving Forward

The Senate will likely take another step this week toward establishing national security requirements for chemical facilities. The Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee is expected to mark up chemical security legislation during a business meeting this Wednesday, June 14. The frontrunner bill, co-sponsored by Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Joseph Lieberman (D-CT), the Chair and ranking minority member, respectively, includes a number of important reporting requirements for chemical facilities.

The Collins-Lieberman bill, the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2005, will require chemical plants and other facilities storing large quantities of hazardous chemicals to develop vulnerability assessments, security plans, and emergency response plans, all of which would be sent to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for review and approval.

As previously reported in The Watcher, the Collins-Lieberman bill fails to include a requirement that safer technologies and procedures be implemented at facilities to reduce the threat of an accident or a terrorist attack. The bill does, however, include important public transparency and accountability requirements.

Sens. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Barack Obama (D-IL), as previously reported, have introduced the only other chemical security bill currently before the Senate. The Lautenberg-Obama bill, The Chemical Security and Safety Act, includes strong requirements that facilities consider inherently safer technologies. The bill also establishes a key role for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in implementing chemical security requirements.

Some of the stronger provisions of the Lautenberg-Obama bill will likely be offered as amendments to the Collins-Lieberman bill. Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH) reportedly will also offer several amendments aimed at weakening the public accountability provisions of the Collins-Lieberman bill, replacing the public reporting provisions with blanket secrecy for the entire chemical security program.