HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
December 5, 2006 Vol. 7, No. 24:   


Published: 12/05/2006

Printable Version
Email to a Friend

Court's decision in Humanitarian Law Project v. Department of Treasury

Aug. 8, 2005 OMB Watcher Ruling on Material Support of Terrorist Organizations Mixed Blessing

See our report Safeguarding Charity in the War on Terror


Court Says Parts of Executive Order Used to Shut Down Charities are Unconstitutional

A Nov. 27 decision by a federal district court in Los Angeles found that two portions of Executive Order 13224 (EO), used to designate organizations as supporters of terrorism, are unconstitutional. The case was filed by the Humanitarian Law Project (HLP) and other nonprofits that want to provide support for "lawful, nonviolent activities" of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) and Tamil Tigers (LTTE), which have both been designated as terrorist organizations.

The 46-page opinion of the court said the EO lacks standards for designating terrorist organizations, giving the President "unfettered discretion", so that designations could be "for any reason, including for.... associating with anyone listed... or for no reason." The opinion also struck down provisions allowing designation of people and groups "otherwise associated" with terrorism because the EO "contains no definable criteria for designating individuals and groups... [and] imposes penalties for mere association." The Center for Constitutional Rights, which acted as counsel in the case, issued a press release, in which Georgetown Law professor David Cole said, "The court's decision confirms that even in fighting terror, unchecked executive authority and trampling on fundamental freedoms is not a permissible option." The Justice Department says it has not yet decided on whether to appeal the ruling.

The court's opinion notes that PKK and LTTE both represent groups seeking self determination in countries where plaintiffs allege they have been subjected to human rights abuses and discrimination. Their activities include political organizing and advocacy, social services, humanitarian aid, and defending people from human rights abuses. HLP brought the case because the law prohibits it from engaging in transactions with the groups, since they have been designated as terrorist organizations. HLP wishes to provide:

  • training in human rights advocacy and peacemaking negotiations
  • legal services to establish institutions that could provide humanitarian aid and negotiate a peace agreement
  • direct humanitarian aid to the PKK and LTTE
  • engineering and technical services to help rebuild infrastructure in areas devastated by the tsunami of 2004
  • psychiatric counseling for tsunami survivors

EO 13224's power to designate people and organizations as "Specially Designated Global Terrorists" comes from the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), as amended by the USA Patriot Act, and the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. These acts authorize the President to declare an emergency with respect to "grave acts of terrorism and threats of terrorism." The laws give the President authority to make regulations to carry out the law, and he in turn has delegated power to make designations to the Secretary of the Treasury. This gives Treasury power to freeze and seize the assets of all persons or groups determined "...to assist, sponsor, or provide financial, material, or technological support for... such acts of (foreign) terrorism or those persons listed in the Annex to this order...or to be otherwise associated with those persons." The original Annex listed 27 persons and organizations, and now includes over 430 entities.