As the resolution does not create any new security standards for Baltimore nor require any action by chemical companies, it is largely an effort to send a message to Congress about the perceived missed opportunity to make communities safer. By explicitly urging the use of safer and more secure technologies in the manufacture, transport, storage or use of chemicals, the resolution essentially urges Congress to go beyond the compromise legislation passed last year as part the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2007.
The program developed by the Department of Homeland Security under those provisions has received criticism for creating the possibility that the program may preempt stronger state and local efforts and for failing to adequately minimize chemical risks by either requiring or encouraging the use of safer substitute chemicals.
The resolution was introduced by Robert Curran, vice president of the council. Curran reportedly explained the resolution saying, "Here are substitutes that they can use instead of those toxic materials for the folks who work at these plants."