Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Monday, June 30, 2008

Bush Signs War Supplemental

President Bush signed into law today a $257 billion supplemental spending package that will fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan several months into the next president's term and a host of domestic programs. Bush's signature on the bill comes days after the Senate passed the measure Thursday night.

The package appropriates some $162 billion dollars for the wars; $62.8 billion for an expanded GI bill; $8.2 billion for a 13-week unemployment insurance benefit extension; and a bevy of other domestic discretionary spending provisions.

WaPo: Bush signs $162 billion war spending bill
CQ (public): Bush Signs Final War Spending Bill of His Presidency


Posted by Craig Jennings, 03:30:05 PM



Friday, June 27, 2008

BudgetBlog on Hiatus for Holiday: Happy Fourth Everyone!

Happy Fourth of July!
Just wanted to let our loyal BudgetBlog readers know we're going on a short hiatus next week. With Congress heading out of town for a short summer recess and the upcoming Fourth of July holiday next week, the Fiscal Policy team is heading out of town in order to escape the heat for some well-deserved vacation. This means, though, that the BudgetBlog will be dormant next week.

But don't despair. Craig and I will return in one short week on July 7 to continue to bring you all the news, gossip, information, and analysis on federal fiscal policy you've come to expect.

Hope everyone has a safe and festive Independence Day next week - be careful with those fireworks.



Posted by Adam Hughes, 06:09:19 PM



Thursday, June 26, 2008

The Heat Must Be Getting to Them

It's the end of June, and the temperature is climbing in the District. And I think it's starting to affect the work of our elected leaders.

The House Appropriations Committee abruptly adjourned in chaos Thursday before acting on two big domestic spending bills, after Republicans tried to force the committee to take up a bill covering the Interior Department they believe could be used to lower fuel prices.

...

Tension began soon after the committee began meeting, when Jerry Lewis of California, the panel's senior Republican, asked Obey to give his word that he would bring the Interior spending bill up for a vote the week Congress returns from its July Fourth recess.

Obey declined, and lectured Lewis. "If the gentleman wants to set the agenda of the committee, he needs to go out and get 30 Republicans elected," he said. [This bit does not appear in the free CQ version of the story, but it is on their pay site here - ed. ]

Lewis stood and offered an amendment to strip the text from the Labor-HHS-Education bill and replace it with the Interior spending bill.

When John E. Peterson , R-Pa., tried to offer an amendment to Lewis' amendment, Rep. Norm Dicks , D-Wash., made a motion to adjourn.

Later, Obey spokeswoman issued the following statement:

"It should come as no surprise to anybody that Dave Obey has no patience for B.S.

"Yesterday, Obey announced to the committee that the Interior Appropriations bill was scheduled to be marked up in full committee on July 9th, giving folks a real debate and real votes on issues in that bill."

"Today's plan by republicans to tie the committee in knots with a series of unrelated amendments was just another political stunt, the kind the American people have come to despise. It is B.S. and Obey won't put up with it."



Posted by Craig Jennings, 03:54:33 PM



GAO Report Finds Private Medicare Providers Prefer Profits Over Providing Better Service

A recently released GAO report finds that (surprise!) Medicare Advantage providers predicted lower profit margins in 2005 than actually materialized.

[Medicare Advantage (MA)] organizations, on average, reported spending 85.7 percent of total revenue on medical expenses in 2005, but had projected medical expenditures of 90.2 percent of total revenue. Because organizations spent less revenue on medical expenses than projected, they earned higher average profits than projected. On average, MA organizations' self-reported actual profit margin was 5.1 percent of total revenue, which is approximately $1.14 billion more in profits in 2005 than MA organizations projected.

And while these MA providers would have been paid the same regardless of their projections, they would have been required to provide beneficiaries either more services or lower premiums had they accurately projected their profit margins.

File this one under "W" for "Well, Duh." A system that depends profit maximizing firms to divulge information that would result in lower profits will, time and time again, result in less-than-accurate information.

If you want to bring the Magic of the MarketplaceTM to government services, transparency matters -- it matters a lot. Just because the government pays a firm to provide services doesn't mean the government won't get taken.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 11:26:20 AM



Yet Another Example of Questionable Outsourcing

Another report of a questionable use of outsourcing appeared today in CongressDaily, this time it's happening over at the State Department. Seems folks over there have modified an existing contract to Computer Sciences Corporation (FedSpending.org profile) to "collect visa information and fingerprints of Mexicans applying for new border crossing cards." The non-competed contract has raised some eyebrows in Congress and among government watchdogs, particularly the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

A State Department official testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Government Management Subcommittee that the contract is just a test program and that the department hopes to initiate a formal competition before the end of the year. But it looks as though that "test program" is just an attempt by the State Department to assess the usefulness of the contract cover their behinds. GAO has not had time to assess the new contracted out work and what impact it will have, and surprise, surprise, neither has the State Department. GAO testified at the same hearing that the State Department has "not developed metrics to measure the success and efficiency of the test program."

So, the State Department is going to determine whether this is a good idea or not by...wait, how are they going to figure that out? Most likely, they have already concluded this outsourcing should happen. My bet is that the test program will lead to a contract for a full program, that Computer Sciences Corp. will undoubtably win, regardless of whether this really is a good deal for taxpayers or might compromise privacy or national security. No worries though - those are just minor details that will unfortunately remain unknown. Sigh...



Posted by Adam Hughes, 10:32:04 AM



Senate GOP Battling Themselves Over Earmarks

Looks like reforms that would bring increased transparency to earmarking in the U.S. Senate will have to wait a little longer. The Senate Republican caucus postponed a vote yesterday on a package of recommendations developed by five GOP senators earlier this year that would increase disclosure of earmark requests and accessibility of earmark language in legislation. The Hill reports:

The conference was scheduled Wednesday to vote on reforms that were first proposed in April by a GOP task force to make the process of inserting pet projects into appropriations bills more transparent. But due to the heavy business awaiting Senate action before the Fourth of July recess, and since some members wanted more time to review the recommendations, the meeting was delayed until next month at the earliest.

The earmark reform debate continues to divide the GOP caucus as Republican appropriators have voiced concerns about some of the reforms proposed by the five-member task force. Indeed many believe the delayed vote was not due to the main reason cited in press reports - a heavy legislative calendar - but because Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is an appropriator and is particularly sensitive to reforms that would curb earmarking.

Even if the GOP adopts the recommendations as written, it will still require a Senate rule change to implement some of the reforms, such as requiring that earmark language appear in the text of legislation and not in accompanying bill reports. It is nice to see transparency reforms continue in the debate in Congress, and people like Sens. Jim DeMint (R-SC) and Tom Coburn (R-OK) should be commended for keeping this issue alive. But increasing access to information about earmarking should really be done in a comprehensive way that links earmark information with bill text and background materials and other online information about Congress. This system should be put online in a central place, be searchable, downloadable, and easily understood by average citizens, and the information must be available before Congress considers legislation - not after.



Posted by Adam Hughes, 08:56:32 AM



Wednesday, June 25, 2008

More Support for Ending the Contracting Free-For-All

Following up on my blog earlier today about the Webb-McCaskill Wartime Contracting Commission finally starting to get off the ground, I came across a great column by Thomas Frank today in the Wall Street Journal (of all places!) continuing the drumbeat for a contracting commission to finally get to the bottom of the rampant shenanigans that have gone on for far too long in Washington.

Frank, who wrote a cultural analysis of American politics in the book "What's the Matter With Kansas?", briefly explores the original of the privatization movement in the U.S. in his latest edition of his column entitled "The Tilting Yard," and calls on conservatives (of all people) to help turn the tide of waste, fraud, and abuse in federal procurement. Frank concludes:

The days when conservatives railed against red tape and shrieked for efficiency in Washington now seem like a lifetime ago. When they finally got the opportunity to put their theory into practice, conservatives contrived instead one of the most wasteful systems ever seen.

It is time for a new Grace Commission, this one examining the sordid history of privatization in all its details.

Frank's column is worth a read: The Tilting Yard: Conservatives and Their Carnival of Fraud



Posted by Adam Hughes, 06:12:06 PM



House Approves Fiscally-Responsible AMT Patch

The voted this afternoon (233-189) to pass a fully-offset, one-year AMT patch that would prevent some 25 million Americans from falling into an alternate tax universe in which their tax bills would jump by an average of $2,000.

The bill's $61.6 billion cost is fully offset mostly by:

  • Treating income of equity fund managers as income, rather than capital gains
  • Revoking some tax cuts for oil companies
  • Closing a loophole currently enjoyed by some foreign-owned firms using tax havens
  • Tighter tax enforcement of merchant credit card payments

These offsets, however, will most likely be stripped by the PAYGO-phobic Senate when it considers the measure.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 03:05:41 PM



Contracting Oversight Commission Members Announced

Craig's post yesterday about some short-sighted decisions at OMB to not provide sufficient resources for contractor oversight at the Army got me thinking about the Webb-McCaskill Commission on Wartime Contracting. There hasn't been a ton of news about that commission since it was enacted into law last fall, but just last week seven of the eight commission members were announced.

Four of the members were selected by Democrats in Congress, one was selected by Republicans in Congress, and two by President Bush. The Project on Government Oversight has a full rundown of the commission members selected so far and ample background information on each of them.

OMB Watch is looking forward to the work of the commission. We hope this badly needed oversight body for the broken federal procurement system will be able to continue to bring to light the significant problems with federal contracting, but also develop policy solutions to prevent future abuses.



Posted by Adam Hughes, 11:18:15 AM



Tuesday, June 24, 2008

OMB Refuses to Prioritize Army Contractor Oversight

A day after we read that OMB denied the Army funds to employ 5 generals that would be in charge of overseeing contracting for the Army, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee issues a report that finds the Army's $300 million contract with fraudster contractor AEY "can be viewed as a case study in what is wrong with the procurement process."

That OMB sees no imperative for improving military contracting is disturbing. The installation of 5 generals to oversee Army contracting follow a recommendation from the Gansler Commission report -- a study that found failures of Army acquisition systems have significantly contributed to the waste, fraud, and abuse..." The report also notes that "Notwithstanding a seven-fold workload increase and greater complexity of contracting, the Institutional Army is not supporting this key capability" and that there are "almost as many contractor personnel in the Kuwait/Iraq/Afghanistan Theater as there are U.S. military, [yet] the Operational Army does not yet recognize the impact of contracting and contractors in expeditionary operations and on mission success.

The House report and associated hearing, meanwhile, describe in quite some detail how these weaknesses in Army acquisition led to "a grossly inadequate assessment of AEY's qualifications, and poor execution and oversight of the contract" with "[t]he result...that U.S. taxpayers have paid over $66 million to a contractor who provided 'unserviceable' ammunition, much of it apparently of illegal Chinese origin.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 04:58:02 PM



Approps Update: Senate Panel Clears Labor-H

By a voice vote, a Senate appropriations subcommittee has approved a FY 2009 Labor-HHS-Education funding bill. The measure would provide about $400 billion less than the House version but bests the president's request by over $7 billion. The bill includes a $1.1 billion boost to NIH and would increase college education funding by $2.7 billion.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 03:42:35 PM



Everybody Needs to Pay Their Taxes...Everybody!

Our friends over at the Government Accountability Office released another great report a week or two ago concerning how Medicare providers (hospitals, nursing homes, and doctors) are failing to pay federal taxes to the tune of at least $2 billion a year. Findings from the report:

Our analysis of data provided by CMS and IRS indicates that over 27,000 health care providers (i.e., about 6 percent of all such providers) paid under Medicare during calendar year 2006 had payroll and other agreed-to federal tax debts totaling over $2 billion. The $2 billion in unpaid tax debts only includes those debts reported on a tax return or assessed by IRS through its enforcement programs. This $2 billion figure is understated because some of these Medicare providers owed taxes under separate tax identification numbers (TIN) from the TINs that received the Medicare payments or they did not file their tax returns.

GAO found some pretty crazy stuff in their investigation, including abusive and potentially criminal activity, and found that many individuals associated with their investigation used the proceeds of their tax evasion for personal profit. Again from GAO:

Furthermore, individuals associated with some of these providers at the same time used payroll taxes withheld from employees for personal gain. Some of these individuals accumulated substantial wealth and assets, including million-dollar houses and luxury vehicles, while failing to pay their federal taxes.

While the actions of these providers is pretty bad, the failure of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) to take any actions to prevent these abuses might be worse:

CMS has not developed a policy to require contractors (1) to obtain consent for IRS disclosure of federal tax debts and (2) to screen providers for unpaid taxes. Further complicating this issue, absent consent by the taxpayer, which CMS does not require, federal law generally prohibits the disclosure of taxpayer data to CMS or its contractors.

IRS can continuously levy up to 15 percent of each payment made to a federal payee—for example, a Medicare hospital—until that tax debt is paid. However, CMS has not incorporated most of its Medicare payments into the continuous levy program. As a result, for calendar year 2006, the government lost opportunities to potentially collect over $140 million in unpaid taxes.

Health care providers receiving federal resources should be treated no differently than contractors who fail to pay their taxes. Congress recently passed legislation to prevent contractors from using off-shore tax havens to avoid paying federal taxes. They should do the same to make sure all entities who benefit from our common resources pay the taxes they owe.

One-Page Summary of GAO Report
Full Report: Thousands of Medicare Providers Abuse the Federal Tax System



Posted by Adam Hughes, 01:53:08 PM



Kyl Language in Senate Housing Bill "Hooey"

The housing legislation that the Senate may vote on this week contains a property deduction similar to one found in the House version of the bill. The provision would allow homeowners who do not itemize their taxes to deduct a fixed amount from their taxes -- $500 for individuals and $1,000 for couples.

Senate Minority Whip John Kyl (R-AZ), however, has inserted language into the bill that would prohibit non-itemizers from using this deduction if they live in locality that raised property taxes from the time of the law's enactment until the end of the year. As the Center on Budget illustrates, this is just a finger in the eye to state and local governments.

In both the short and the long run, [Kyl's language] is likely to impede efforts of localities to provide an adequate level of services for their residents, including schools, public safety, roads, libraries, parks, and social services. Moreover, it is an unwarranted and unprecedented intrusion by the federal government into policies that always have been left to the states to determine.

But there's also a chance the legislation's property tax increase penalty could extend beyond Dec. 31, 2008.

History suggests, however, that once a deduction is included in the tax code for one year, there is a high probability it will become an "extender" that is renewed every year. Examples include the deduction for state and local sales tax, the deduction for qualified tuition expenses, and the deduction for teacher classroom expenses, as well as a host of business-oriented deductions and credits. If this type of restriction on local property tax revenue were continued for several years, it would fundamentally alter the nature of state and local finance in the country and represent a basic change in the principles of federalism.
National Education Association lobbyist Alfred Campos describes the provision a little more succinctly ($).
This is all hooey...This is going to severely hamper the ability for state and local governments to address looming education shortfalls...


Posted by Craig Jennings, 11:28:56 AM



Monday, June 23, 2008

Social Security Can Wait. Really.

A "Brookings Alert" in my inbox this morning directs me to an op-ed by Brookings Senior Fellow Alice M. Rivlin and U. Mich Prof. John W. Kingdon entitled "Next President and Congress: Tackle Social Security First." Oy.

I'm going to outsource this one to Shawn Fremstad over at Inclusion.

What's missing from Rivlin and Kingdon's op-ed is any reality-based account of why Social Security should even be on the list of problems that the next administration needs to tackle over the next four years. According to CBO, the Social Security surplus a decade from now will be around $250 billion. Moreover, Social Security is fully solvent, under current projections, until 2046.

There are real crises out there. Social Security just isn't one of them.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 04:23:32 PM



Friday, June 20, 2008

House Approves Supplemental War, Domestic Spending
Spending bill sent to Senate

Yesterday evening (Thurs.), the House approved a pair of amendments to the war supplemental spending bill that would found the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and would provide funding for exetended unemployment benefits, expanded GI bill benefits, and a host other domestic spending provisions.

By a vote of 268-155, the House approved $161.8 billion in war funding. And by a vote of 416-12, it approved some $92 billion in domestic spending.

The package has been sent to the Senate, where it will be considered sometime next week. The president has expressed support for the bill and will likely sign it when it reaches his desk.

The following table comes from the House Appropriations Committee press release:

Emergency Supplemental - Appropriations Breakdown
(in millions of dollars)
Amendment #1 Bush RequestHouse Bill
Department of Defense 2008 100,05499,506
Department of Defense 2009 66,06365,921
Subtotal Amendment #1 166,117165,427*
Amendment #2
Foreign Aid
State Department/USAID FY08
State Department/USAID FY09
PL480 Food Aid FY08
PL480 Food Aid FY09
9,423
5,074
3,605
350
395
10,089
5,164
3,680
850
395
Military Construction & VA Hospitals 2,4384,642
Disaster Relief
FEMA Disaster Relief Account
Army Corps of Engineers
SBA —Disaster Loans
Agriculture Assistance
0
0
0
0
0
2,650
1,297
606
267
480
Louisiana Levees (FY09) 5,7615,761
Louisiana Housing Vouchers 073
Department of Justice 186271
Program Shortfalls
FDA Bureau of Prisons
Census Cost Overruns
Increased UI Claims
Science
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,048
150
178
210
110
400
Veterans Education Benefits — Admin. Costs 0120
Defense Reduction -- -3,578
Death Benefit — Mrs. Lantos 00.169
Subtotal Amendment #2 17,75821,075
TOTAL COST FOR APPROPRIATIONS ITEMS 183,876186,502
Estimates for GI Benefits and Unemployment Extension
2 Year Estimate11 Year Estimate
Expanded GI Benefits$769 million$62.8 billion
Unemployment Extension$12.5 billion$8.2 billion
(*see reduction in Amendment #2)


Posted by Craig Jennings, 02:01:15 PM



Thursday, June 19, 2008

President Closes Contractor Loophole

When President Bush signed into law the Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act (HR 6081) on Tuesday, he forced domestic firms employing workers through off-shore shell companies to pay payroll taxes when performing work on federal contracts. The provision in the bill uses language from the Fair Share Act (HR 5602).

Writing on Womenstake, the National Women's Law Center blog, Joan Entmacher notes that Bush signed the bill despite its inclusion of the Fair Share Act language.

Of course, cracking down on abuses by defense contractors wasn't the reason President Bush signed the bill. The new law provides tax assistance for military families -- a cause so popular that the bill passed the House 403 to 0 and the Senate by unanimous consent. So, at least this time, President Bush was willing to set aside his belief that tax cuts should not be financed by raising other revenues.

But, when it comes to closing much larger loopholes exploited by super-wealthy private investment fund managers, President Bush and his allies on Capitol Hill so far are giving no sign that they are willing to relent.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 05:43:05 PM



Wednesday, June 18, 2008

War Supp: What's Up with That?
Hoyer eyeing Thursday for House vote; GI Bill offset included

(Updated below)

By cancelling approps markups this week, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) has cleared the deck for floor consideration of that chamber's latest revision of the war supplemental spending package. With the exception of additional funds for midwest region's recent flooding disaster (speculation is $2 billion-ish), the House bill is shaping up to look pretty much like the original sent to the Senate oh-so-long ago:

  • Fulfillment of the remaining war funding request for FY 2008 and part of FY 2009
  • 13 weeks of extended unemployment insurance benefits, with an another 13 weeks for those living in "high-unemployment" states (for a total of 26 weeks).
  • $52 billion expansion of the G.I. bill
  • A smattering of other domestic spending

Although House Blue Dogs talked Democratic leadership into including a tax provision to offset a $52 billion expansion of the G.I. bill, "Democratic aids" say that if the Senate ultimately strips the bill of the revenue raiser, they won't stand in the way of final passage in the House. Observers will recall that the first war supp included such an offset, and that the Senate voted on and rejected said offset. Baffling to me, then, is why the insistence on repeating the process only to announce that support for the offset in the House will totally collapse upon Senate rejection.

UPDATE: House Democratic leadership have announced they have reached a compromise with the White House.

The bill will include
  • Fulfillment of the remaining war funding request for FY 2008 and part of FY 2009
  • 13 weeks of extended unemployment insurance benefits for all states: There will be not additional 13 week extension for high-unemployment states.
  • $52 billion expansion of the G.I. bill that will not be offset with a 0.5% millionaire surtax
  • $2.65 billion for midwest flood relief
  • Postponement of six new Medicaid regulations implemented by the Bush Administration (postponement of the a seventh regulation passed the House independently in April)


Posted by Craig Jennings, 04:38:25 PM



GAO Upholds Boeing Protest over Tanker Contract

Breaking news from the Government Accountability Office related to the much-hyped $35 billion refueling tanker contract that the Air Force awarded to a Northrop Grumman/EADS partnership earlier this year (see BudgetBlog coverage here, here, and here). In what is being described as a "stunning" decision, the GAO has upheld a protest of the contract award lodged by Boeing. CongressDaily reports:

In a stunning decision, GAO today announced it has sustained a protest filed by Boeing Co. over the Air Force's decision to award a lucrative contract for aerial refueling tankers to a team led by Northrop Grumman and EADS, the European firm behind Airbus. GAO's decision followed a 100-day review of the Air Force's selection process for the $35 billion program. GAO recommends that the Air Force reopen discussions with the contractors, obtain revised proposals and make a new decision. The service was also asked to reimburse Boeing for the cost of the protest.

I guess it is back to the drawing board for the Air Force.

UPDATE:
More information on the GAO decision is available in this article from The Hill: GAO sides with Boeing.



Posted by Adam Hughes, 02:27:20 PM



House Approps Subcommittee Boosts IRS Funding, Takes Aim at Private Debt Collection

The House Appropriations Financial Services Subcommittee approved, by voice vote, a $22.4 billion bill that would provide funds for the Treasury Department and the District of Columbia. Included in the measure is $11.4 billion for the IRS, a slight increase over the president's request and over $300 million more than the current budget. And while the IRS' enforcement budget allotment matches the president's request -- a respectable 7 percent increase over current levels --, the committee saw fit to raise Bush's $2.15 billion request for taxpayer services funding by $60 million.

The subcommittee also zeroed out funding for the IRS' private debt collection. The controversial move will likely raise the ire of supporters of the program, and if history repeats itself, the program will see funding restored if Congress passes a continuing resolution for FY 2009 later this year.

Here's the approps scorecard thus far:



Posted by Craig Jennings, 10:42:44 AM



Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Plus Ca Change All Over Again on Extenders
McConnell, Kyl, & Grassley Browbeat Biz-Boys

The Senate again today defeated a cloture motion (to permit voting) on the bill to extend a raft of popular tax breaks, by a vote of 52-44.

379 large U.S. companies, among them Bank of America, Boeing, Citigroup, Ford Motor Co., Pfizer and Walt Disney, wrote the Senate a letter yesterday warning that failing to approve tax extension provisions could harm the economy. Mindful that House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) and House Ways & Means chair Charles Rangel (D-NY) are adamant about paying for the extenders bill, the companies have made it clear they are determined to see the bill pass, even if it complies with PAYGO.

Word on the Hill is that some of those business leaders met this afternoon with Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-AZ) and Finance ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-IA), and got a talking to. The Senators told them support for Senate Finance Committee chair Max Baucus' (D-MT) extenders bill -- which complies with PAYGO -- would threaten their relationship with conservative lawmakers, "ma[king] it very clear to the business community that they have the votes to block cloture," according to a lobbyist present at the meeting.

The reason for the tough talk? The business community may not oppose the offsets contained in the Baucus bill, the Senators told them, but they might oppose future offsets and Republicans must be consistent in their opposition.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 05:02:11 PM



Pentagon Removes Impediments to Flushing Cash Away

Writing in The New York Times, James Risen brings us an astonishing article on the circumstances surrounding the firing of the Army official in charge of overseeing the KBR contract in Iraq. It's not only galling to read that the chief of the Field Support Contracting Division of the Army Field Support Command Charles M. Smith was sacked because he refused to approve payment for unsubstantiated work by KBR, but it's a sharp reminder of how the current level of Iraq contracting has lead to billions and billions of wasted federal funds.

Army auditors had determined that KBR lacked credible data or records for more than $1 billion in spending, so Mr. Smith refused to sign off on the payments to the company. "They had a gigantic amount of costs they couldn't justify," he said in an interview. "Ultimately, the money that was going to KBR was money being taken away from the troops, and I wasn't going to do that."

But he was suddenly replaced, he said, and his successors — after taking the unusual step of hiring an outside contractor to consider KBR's claims — approved most of the payments he had tried to block.

That's awful. But, the Army's rationale for making sure the cash spigot flows unabated signals even deeper problems with Pentagon procurement.



Read more...

Posted by Craig Jennings, 12:03:21 PM



DAILY FISCAL POLICY REPORT -- June 17, 2008

Unemployment -- House To Keep UI in Supp.; Senate in Limbo: House Democratic leaders will include a provision extending unemployment insurance in the pending war supplemental appropriations bill, scrapping an idea to drop the provision that came from an effort to reduce the domestic funding portion of the package and avoid a veto from President Bush. This morning, Senate Republican blocked Majority Leader Reid's request that the Senate consider a free standing UI Extension. AP Story.

Extenders -- Senate cloture Vote Slated for Today: After a delay of one day due to storms that kept Senators out of town, an extenders cloture vote (to cut off debate and permit a vote) is slated for today; it is expected to be close. Though Senate Republicans generally oppose cloture, saying offsets are not needed for extending current tax policy. 379 companies lobbied the Hill yesterday, saying that "failure to act this summer on tax extender legislation will have significant negative consequences for the U.S. economy," impliedly telling the Senate, passage is worth PAYGO. Senate Extenders Package Cost Estimate.

Budget -- Economy Putting Pressure on PAYGO Principles?: On June 12, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said it was possible that the jobless benefits, the veterans education benefits and a second stimulus package would not be offset, or even should be, given economic conditions. Said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB): "While it made sense to pass the first stimulus bill without worrying about how to pay for it, the economy has now become a tired excuse for fiscally irresponsible policies. If we want to spend money on unemployment, veterans, or anything else, we need to find a way to pay for the spending." CRFB on PAYGO.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 10:35:53 AM



Monday, June 16, 2008

Senate Extenders Cloture Re-Vote Imminent
If at First You Don't Succeed...

Last week, a bid by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to invoke cloture (to stop debate and allow voting) on the Senate tax break extender bill fell short by ten votes (see background squib). But it appears that the Senate will vote on the cloture motion again later this afternoon.

What has happened in the interim to suggest a different outcome this time? Senate Republicans have come under increasing pressure from corporations which desperately want their tax incentives extended or revived, even if it means increases in certain business taxes to pay for it (see Corporate Community Copacetic).

Businesses have sought to rally support for the measure in recent days, going so far as to warn senators that not backing the tax breaks would harm the economy. In a letter sent to Senate Finance Committee chair Max Baucus (D-MT) today, 379 companies, including some of the largest in the U.S., among them Bank of America, Boeing, Citigroup, the Ford Motor Co., Pflzer and Walt Disney, wrote:

Swift action is now needed by the Senate to enact a tax extenders package that will bring significant positive benefits to the U.S. economy.

We applaude this display of corporate fiscal responsibility and will share the full text of the letter and the results of the cloture vote with you as soon as they become available.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 03:51:38 PM



DAILY FISCAL POLICY REPORT -- June 16, 2008

Supplemental -- House Aims to Pass Bill by July 4: The House floor may see key action this week toward passage of the war spending supplemental package covering the costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars for the rest of FY08 and into FY09. The bill has been delayed as Democrats have sought consensus on whether expanded veterans benefits, extended unemployment benefits and other domestic spending provisions will be attached and offset. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said last week that Congress will have the bill ready for the president's signature by July 4. If Democrats can reach a deal, the bill could go to the Rules Committee on Tuesday and be on the floor Wednesday. Story.

Budget -- The Killer 302(b)s on Their Way: The appropriations process has gotten off to a slow start this year because of the late approval of a final budget resolution and the continuing negotiations on a FY08 supplemental war spending bill. But the House Approps Committee released its 302(b) spending allocations last Friday and the Senate panel will release its allocations this week. They are expected to be similar. The majority of the 302(b) caps violate the veto thresholds outlined by President Bush in February. OMBW Approps Chart.

Extenders -- Business, Senate Dems Eye PAYGO : In letters sent to the Senate GOP leadership this past week, Senate Democrats and hundreds of major U.S. corporation have urged the GOP to drop its opposition to paying for the dozens of popular tax breaks known as "extenders" in the $55 billion bill ($120 billion, including the AMT patch) expected to hit the Senate floor in the coming days. The Democratc' letter tells the GOP: "your statements give the impression you are... blocking this much-needed tax relief... in order to protect a small group of wealthy investment-fund managers." Senate Democratic Letter. Story on Corporate Letter.

Posted by Dana Chasin, 09:59:04 AM



Friday, June 13, 2008

Approps Update
House Approps Committee Releases 302(b)s; Byrd Announces Markup Schedule

The House Appropriations Committee has released its 302(b) allocations.

House FY 2009 302(b) Allocations
(discretionary budget authority; excluding emergency funding unless otherwise noted; in billions of dollars)
FY 2009 Proposed Allocations
Defense$487.737
Homeland Security39.900
Homeland Advance Appropriations: BioShield2.175
Military Construction & Veterans Affairs72.729
Subtotal, Security-Related602.541
State & Foreign Operations36.620
Agriculture20.623
Commerce, Justice, & Science56.858
Energy & Water33.265
Financial Services & General Government22.390
Interior & the Environment27.867
Labor, Health, & Education153.121
Legislative Branch4.404
Transportation & Housing54.997
Subtotal, Domestic373.525
Total$1,012.686

And, Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) has announced his "intention to complete Full Committee action on all of the 12 appropriations bills by the end of July." The press release also indicates that that subcommittee markups are to begin the week of June 16, starting with Commerce, Justice, Science and Homeland Security on June 18.

Also, three approps subcommittees in the House have wrapped up their work. Here's the current situation:



Posted by Craig Jennings, 04:50:08 PM



Beleaguered OSC Head Attempted to Mobilize Grass-Roots Support

The investigation of Office of Special Counsel chief Scott Bloch is turning up some rather comical footnotes to the saga.

On many occasions since 2006, Bloch ordered a subordinate to post comments on blogs and in the "comment" sections of online news stories using a pseudonym, current and former OSC employees told CongressDaily.

[...]

"Bloch would suggest posting things in the comments section. ... There'd be a negative article about Scott's involvement on something ... and [the] comment would be something like 'This Bloch guy is doing a good job."

[...]

The former OSC employee, who described the Web posting operation in exchange for anonymity, said such instances might have numbered in "the double digits." Bloch "would be involved in the discussion of what should be said," the employee said.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 09:51:29 AM



DAILY FISCAL POLICY REPORT -- Friday the 13th, June 2008

Unemployment Claims -- June Starts off Much Like May: The number of first-time claims for unemployment insurance rose 25,000 in the week ended June 7 to 384,000 seasonally adjusted, according to the Labor Department's Employment and Training Administration data. The rise follows a decline of 16,000 in the week ended May 31. The unemployment extension bill having passed in the House yesterday (see here), these numbers may have some bearing on the Senate's deliberations. Today's ETA Report.

Earmarks -- Earmark Spending Makes a Comeback: From the front page of today's Wash Post, "Think of a way to spend money on defense, and it could easily be among the hundreds of projects added quietly to the House and Senate spending plans this spring. Many of the earmarks serve as no-bid contracts for the recipients." Earmark spending in the House's defense authorization bill alone soared 29 percent, from $7.7 billion last year to $9.9 billion now. Wash Post Story and Blog.

Taxes -- CBPP on PAYGO and the Extenders: A report issued this week by the non-partisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities examines the fiscal implications of the tax extender bills the House and Senate are working on. Conclusion: "Unfortunately, key congressional Republicans are now arguing that any extension of existing tax provisions should be deficit financed, on principle. This claim will make it much tougher for Congress to live up to its pledge of fiscal discipline and could ultimately lead to multi-trillion dollar increases in the national debt." Report.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 09:37:54 AM



Thursday, June 12, 2008

The PAYGO Pact of 2008
How Many Pay-Fors Can Dance on the Head of an Extenders Bill?

Call it solomonic, metaphysical, ingenious, or disengenuous, but it appears that a great PAYGO Pact of 2008 is in the offing.

Here's the conundrum: since the principles of PAYGO apply only to changes in current law increasing mandatory spending or decreasing taxes, how many times must temporary extensions of tax breaks be extended before they are no longer regarded as "extenders," but as "current law." It seems to beg reasoning to say that merely calling them "permanent" (since they can be eliminated any time) makes them current law. But it also seems paradoxical that an extended tax break can ever evade the strictures of PAYGO.

Count on Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the Senate Finance Committee's ranking member, to cut the Gordian knot. He's working on a plan that would offset certain extenders that could be considered "new" extenders because they are being added or modified in the extenders package. Under the plan, extension of the research and development tax credit would not be paid for, while a number of the energy provisions, like the newly-added credit for energy-efficiency improvements to existing homes would be offset.

Elegant enough? Not quite. Grassley said he hears that Democrats on the Finance Committee believe there is $18-19 billion in new policy to be offset, but his staff puts the number closer to $5-6 billion.

It may come down to what the meaning of "new" is. Take the Grassley Challenge and figure it out for yourself:

Whatever the answer is could be known, the extender package pay-fors determined, and the package voted on as early as next Monday.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 05:49:35 PM



House Passes UI Extension by a Two-Thirds Margin
What a Difference a Day Makes

Yesterday's suspension vote in the House to extend unemployment insurance benefits by at least 13 weeks fell short of the required a two-thirds supermajority by a mere three votes -- perhaps attributable to the eleven members who did not vote.

This afternoon, the House voted again on the proposal as a stand-alone bill and, guess what? It passed precisely by a two-thirds, i.e., veto-proof, margin.

As Speaker Pelosi mentioned in a statement following today's vote, the bill does not only help the nation's unemployed workers, but the rest of us:

Extending unemployment benefits has the potential to help the entire American economy. According to the Congressional Budget Office, it is one of the most cost-effective and fast-acting ways to stimulate the economy because the money is spent quickly. For every $1 spent on unemployment benefits generates $1.64 in new economic demand.

The measure passed with support from 49 Republican House members, who bolted the Bush line opposing the bill, contained in yesterday's veto threat.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 04:27:47 PM



Wednesday, June 11, 2008

The Solution to Growing Unemployment: Free Trade Deals?

Today, the Bush Administration issued a veto threat against H.R. 5794, the Emergency Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2008.

Please read the following and see if you can spot the non sequitur:

The Administration is deeply committed to continually fostering an environment where every American who wants a job has a job. The Administration believes the best way to help workers is to create an environment that encourages job creation and to promote effective job training. To accomplish these goals, the Administration urges Congress to create more opportunities for American exporters by passing the pending free trade agreements with Columbia, Panama, and South Korea, make permanent the President's tax cuts that will expire over the next two years, and reform and reauthorize the Trade Adjustment Assistance program and the Workforce Investment Act. The Administration looks forward to continuing to work with Congress to enact these important measures. However, the Administration strongly opposes H.R. 5749. If H.R. 5749 were presented to the President, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill.

Oh, wait -- I think I get it. Those free trade agreements are with some pretty small countries with pretty small economies. In economies of small scale, the blessings of free trade really could make a difference with respect to unemployment...

... in Panama.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 02:31:34 PM



Fuzzy Wuzzy Was a Bear ... Market
Wuzzy, Willie B. or Izzy a ... Recession?


(click to enlarge)

As this graph from the Current Population Survey shows, the recent rate of increase in the number of jobless workers -- which runs through March of this year and so does not include the surge in unemployment recorded for the month of May -- may signal an "official" recession. But don't tell the American people that.

Three-quarters of us say that we're in one already.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 01:17:57 PM



Flat Tax Advocates Misrepresent (Misunderstand?) Flat Tax

House Republican leadership are attempting to get their caucus to coalesce around a two-tier flat tax.

The flat-tax proposal is expected to resemble a measure (HR 3818) sponsored by Rep. Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, the ranking Republican on the Budget Committee, to allow taxpayers to opt out of the current income tax system and opt into a two-tier flat tax.

Sen. McCain, R-Ariz., has said he supports "giving Americans a choice between filing under the current system or using a two-rate flat tax with generous deductions."

McCain "wants a simplified tax. He wants taxpayers to be able to file a one-page return and something they could opt into," said Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.

Look, it's not the progressive schedule of tax rates that makes filing taxes so complicated. The complicating factor is what to tax. Figuring out what can be deducted, how much can be deducted, what kind of income is taxed at rate X and which is taxed at rate Y, are what turns the annual ritual into a multi-page extravangaza.

Here's how our progressive tax structure filing taxes complicated an confusing:


(click to enlarge)

Why flat tax advocates believe this little calculator is responsible for complicated and multipaged tax returns is beyond me. Is it possible that they would use obtuse tax forms as an excuse to decimate the tax code's progressivity?

And ironically, there's overlap between the One Page Return Flat Tax group and those who are constantly suggesting new ways in which the tax code can ease all our social ills (i.e. tax breaks for health savings accounts, tax breaks for homeowners, tax breaks for charitable donations, etc). It's precisely this chipping away at the tax code that makes filing taxes so complicated.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 01:11:30 PM



We're Pleased with Pay-Fors in Extender Package
Corporate Community Copacetic

Congressional Quarterly has obtained a preliminary draft of a letter from 300 Americans companies from Apple to Xerox expressing a support for a package extending expiring tax breaks -- paid for by the curtailing of some big-ticket corporate tax cuts.

According to the early draft, the companies indicated that the House bill

includes revenue-raising provisions that are relatively noncontroversial compared to the large tax increases that would fall on American companies and American workers if the expired and expiring provisions are not extended... Opposition to any and all revenue raisers should not impede action necessary to prevent these tax increases.

Such a position would be directly at odds with the oft-stated, nearly-unanimous view of the GOP Senate conference that corporate tax breaks should not be paid for -- and certainly not by offsetting reduction of other corporate tax breaks.

We will keep you posted regarding the letter and further lobbying efforts by the corporations regarding the tax extenders package.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 10:55:37 AM



DAILY FISCAL POLICY REPORT -- June 11, 2008

Unemployment -- What is the Fastest Vehicle?: House and Senate leaders haven't decided yet how best to pass a 13-week extension of unemployment insurance benefits for the nation's 8.55 million jobless workers. The House is inclining toward a stand-alone extension bill, believing that would quickly secure a veto-proof majority. Senate leaders and some Republicans such as Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) say the "emergency" war supplemental "is the fastest vehicle" available. The House is expected to vote on a stand-alone version of the bill this afternoon or tomorrow. GOP Deserting Bush on UI.

Taxes -- Extenders on Hold as Cloture Vote Fails: By a vote of 50-44 yesterday, the Senate failed to invoke cloture -- cut off debate and move to a final vote -- on a $120 billion package of popular tax breaks known as "extenders" and a one-year AMT "patch." While the patch is not offset, the rest of the bill would be largely paid for by curtailing two tax breaks, consistent with a similar package that cleared the House May 21 (see Report). Senate Extenders Bill Summary.

Fiscal/Monetary Policy -- NY Fed Chair Speaks: Federal Reserve Bank of New York President Timothy Geithner shed new light Monday on the Fed's decision to help facilitate the sale of Bear Stearns to JP Morgan Chase. "We did this with great reluctance, and only because it was the only feasible option available to avert default... Although we assumed some risk in this transaction, that risk is modest in comparison to the risk of very substantial damage that would have accompanied default." Some believe the vast perponderance of the risk is being borne by U.S. taxpayers. NYT Commentary.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 08:59:23 AM



Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Appropriators Get to Work

With the bicameral adoption of a budget resolution last week, Congress embarks on the long, strange trip known as "the appropriations process."

Occasionally, we'll update this chart to let you know where everything stands.

Or, you can also follow all the appropriations action on the Thomas "Status of Appropriations Legislation for Fiscal Year 2009" website.

House FY 2009 Appropriations Markup Schedule
6/11/2008 Subcommittee Markup — Homeland Security
6/11/2008 Subcommittee Markup — Interior & the Environment
6/12/2008 Subcommittee Markup — Military Construction & Veterans Affairs
6/12/2008 Subcommittee Markup — Commerce, Justice, & Science
6/17/2008 Subcommittee Markup — Financial Services
6/17/2008 Subcommittee Markup — Energy & Water
6/18/2008 Full Committee Consideration — Subcommittee Allocations/302(b)s
6/18/2008 Full Committee Markup — Homeland Security
6/18/2008 Full Committee Markup — Interior & the Environment
6/19/2008 Subcommittee Markup — Labor, Health, & Education
6/19/2008 Subcommittee Markup — Agriculture
6/19/2008 Full Committee Markup — Military Construction & Veterans Affairs
6/19/2008 Full Committee Markup — Commerce, Justice, & Science
6/20/2008 Subcommittee Markup — Transportation & Housing
6/20/2008 Subcommittee Markup — Legislative Branch
6/24/2008 Full Committee Markup — Energy & Water
6/24/2008 Full Committee Markup — Financial Services
6/25/2008 Full Committee Markup — Labor, Health, & Education
6/25/2008 Full Committee Markup — Agriculture
6/26/2008 Full Committee Markup — Transportation & Housing
6/26/2008Full Committee Markup — Legislative Branch
7/16/2008 Subcommittee Markup — Defense
7/16/2008 Subcommittee Markup — State & Foreign Operations
7/23/2008 Full Committee Markup — Defense
7/23/2008 Full Committee Markup — State & Foreign Operations


Posted by Craig Jennings, 05:08:42 PM



House-Passed Bill Would Create GAO IG, Restore Pay Raises

The House passed by voice vote today the The Government Accountability Office Act of 2008 (HR 5683). The bill was crafted to restore pay raises that were denied to mid-level employees in 2006 and 2007 when then-Comptroller General revised the performance system at GAO. The bill, however, would also create an office of inspector general within the GAO.

However, before the bill could be approved under suspension of the rules, Democrats had to strip a few controversial provisions that would have allowed the GAO to administer oaths to agency employees; obtain information on Medicare Part D (the drug benefit) from HHS; and force the FDA to give the GAO information on drug pricing information, even if that information is considered a trade secret.

When the bill was passed out of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, ranking member Tom Davis (R-VA) issued a statement with this revealing bit of logic:

By increasing GAO's investigative powers, I am concerned we will trigger a chilling effect on GAO's relationship with federal agencies — resulting in agencies being less forthcoming in providing information and diminishing GAO's role in improving government operations and promoting best practices in the federal government.

Maybe we should apply this logic to contractor oversight -- restrict investigative authority and contractors will be banging down the Oversight Committee's door in a fevered rush to declare their own misdeeds.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 01:45:13 PM



The $12 Billion Question
Does UI Extension Require Compliance with PAYGO?

Would that it were easy to answer this one. As you might imagine, the answer is: it depends.

PRO: PAYGO applies to an extension of unemployment insurance (UI) benefits because there would be -- without an offset -- a net increase of the deficit at the end of the day. Like other trust funds (think Social Security), there is no actual money there, just IOUs.

CON: But in the case of the UI trust fund, there is plenty of money in the account -- it's $35 billion in the black and the proposed legislation would cost roughly $12 billion over ten years.

ANSWER: the current ($35 bn. surplus) condition of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) trust fund has no bearing on the question. More directly relevant is whether the proposed UI extension is adopted as part of the emergency supplemental war spending appropriation (as it was in the Senate), or as a stand-alone bill. If the former, technically mandatory spending is not subject to PAYGO on an emergency supplemental appropriations bill; if the latter, the stand-alone, without offsets, would be subject to a (waivable) point of order under the rules of PAYGO.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 12:15:03 PM



CBPP: Tax Extenders Need Comprehensive Review

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has a helpful policy brief out today that runs through all the reasons the upcoming package of tax cuts -- popularly referred to as the "extenders" package -- should be offset. We couldn't agree with CBPP more. In their brief, they make four main points, the last of which is probably the most important:

  • Congress should pay for the tax extenders, as its budget rules require.
  • Arguments against applying PAYGO to the extenders bill do not withstand scrutiny..
  • The offsets in the House-passed bill are reasonable policy.
  • In the future, Congress should subject the extenders to greater scrutiny.

CBPP makes a great point with the fourth one on the list. There has not been any mention during debate on the extenders this year (or in any past year I can remember) that considered whether some of the provisions of the "extenders" package should continue to exist. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel (D-NY) did mention during a committee markup that a comprehensive review of the package to determine which aspects were achieving their goals was necessary, but that review has not yet taken place. The popular name of the package itself -- the "extenders -- implies these tax policy provision will live on year after year without any review.

Hopefully while Congress tries to get its act together in order to go the extra mile and do a comprehensive review of the "extenders" package, they will at least do no harm and pay for the policies they want to extend wholesale.



Posted by Adam Hughes, 11:35:13 AM



DAILY FISCAL POLICY REPORT -- June 10, 2008

Taxes -- House Vote on Unemployment Benefit Extension: The House is expected to vote later this week on H.R. 4934, a bill to extend unemployment insurance for workers who have exhausted their benefits by up to 13 weeks in every state as well as an additional 13 weeks in states with higher levels of unemployment. The bill's language defines "higher levels" as a seasonally adjusted 6 percent total unemployment rate or a 4 percent insured unemployment rate. The bill is expected to cost about $14 billion, and the funding levels are not offset in the bill, raising possible "pay-go" concerns. CRS Bill Summary.

Taxes -- On Deck in the Senate: the Extenders: This week, and perhaps as soon as this afternoon, legislation patching the alternative minimum tax and extending expired or expiring temporary tax measures will hit the Senate floor, following a key vote on a bill to tax "windfall profits" from energy companies. An aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said if senators do not invoke cloture on the energy bill, the vote on the extenders bill -- price-tag: $55 billion -- would occur right away. Tax News story.

Contracting -- Bush Orders Contractors to Vet Illegals: On June 6, President Bush issued an executive order requiring federal contractors to participate in "E-Verify" -- the Department of Homeland Security's electronic system for verifying the immigration status of their workers, greatly expanding the reach of the administration's crackdown on employers who hire illegal immigrants. About 69,000 employers are now enrolled in the program, which is voluntary, up from about 5,900 in 2005, out of an estimated 7.4 million employers in the United States. Executive Order 12989.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 08:17:30 AM



Monday, June 09, 2008

Military Wages

Congress has sent the president a bill that would, in addition to forcing free-riding federal contractors to pay payroll taxes, "allow soldiers receiving combat pay to have their money counted as income for the purposes of the Earned Income Tax Credit." (BNA email)

I realize that we blow a lot of cash on the military, but does it strike anyone as odd that some Americans getting shot at in a combat zone in service of their country are paid so little that they qualify for EITC?



Posted by Craig Jennings, 11:38:29 AM



DAILY FISCAL POLICY REPORT -- June 9, 2008

Economy -- Gas Prices Hit National Average of $4: Gasoline prices reached a national average of $4 a gallon for the first time over the weekend, adding more strain to the economy. "This crisis really impacts those who are at the economic margins of society, mostly in the rural areas and particularly parts of the Southeast," said Fred Rozell, retail pricing director at the Oil Price Information Service. Gas prices have risen a dollar a gallon since January 1. NY Times.

Taxes -- Congress OKs Bill Punishing Tax Scoff-Laws: Last Friday, Congress sent a bill (H.R. 6081) to the president to provide military families with $1.2 billion in tax breaks, paid for in part by raising taxes on U.S. contractors who circumvent payroll taxes by hiring employees through offshore shell companies. The bill, which is entirely offset, would also raise revenue by taxing U.S. citizens and long-term U.S. residents on worldwide income, to prevent tax avoidance by renouncing their citizenship or moving overseas. President Bush has said he will sign the measure. H.R. 6081 Bill Summary.

Appropriations -- On Your Mark, Get Set... Stop?: With the FY09 budget resolution approved, attention now turns to the appropriation committees and subcommittees. In the House, a full slate of subcommittee spending bill markups has been scheduled. No action on the Senate side has been announced. House Appropriations chair Rep. David Obey predicted: "if we are filibustered to death or if the administration refuses to make any significant compromises as it did last year, that will obviously prevent bills from being finished." Appropriations Process.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 10:26:36 AM



Friday, June 06, 2008

Workers See Fewer Hours, More Weeks Unemployed

As Dana noted in this morning's daily report, the unemployment numbers released this morning were bad enough to put unemployment insurance (UI) benefits extension back in play for the domestic spending section of the FY 08-09 war supp.

But the past couple of weeks have seen the release of a couple of other data points that should increase concern among lawmakers that the U.S. labor force has come into sour times.

  • The number of continuing UI claims -- workers receiving UI benefits for more than one week -- has not been this high since March 2004. The number of continuing claims has been sharply increasing since Nov. 2007.


(click to enlarge)

  • On Wed. (June 4), the Dept. of Labor reported that productivity in the first quarter was increasing at an annualized rate of 2.6% -- a healthy number. But that number -- the economic output per unit of labor -- is the result of employers scaling back hours, making workers worse off.

It should also be noted that May's 49,000 net job loss was buoyed by the addition of 17,000 government jobs; the private sector lost 66,000 jobs, continuing a six-month decline in private jobs.


(click to enlarge)


Posted by Craig Jennings, 02:18:48 PM



DAILY FISCAL POLICY REPORT -- June 6, 2008

Unemployment -- Monthly Rate Jump Highest Since Feb. 1986: The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported this morning that the nation's unemployment rate rose a half of a percent, from 5.0 in April to 5.5 percent in May, the fastest rise in 22 years, as 861,000 joined the ranks of the unemployed. Meanwhile, those with jobs have seen their real wages shrink this past year: hourly earnings have risen 3.5 percent, below the pace of inflation, which is running at about 4 percent. NY Times.

UI Benefits -- Unemployment Extension Back on Table: Even before this morning's unemployment report, word on Capitol Hill yesterday was that a 13-week extension of unemployment insurance benefits may be re-added to the war supplemental bill. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) had all but ruled an extension out on Wednesday. But yesterday Hoyer told reporters that "It is still under discussion." Center on Budget Statement.

Budget -- Congress Adopts Resolution for FY09: It's certainly not the end, nor the beginning of the end, but it is a noteworthy end of the beginning of the FY09 budget-making process. By a narrow majority, 214-210, the House passed a budget resolution for the next fiscal year and the appropriations committees now have allocation caps for the spending bills they will begin marking up as early as next week. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) called the budget's adoption "a remarkable achievement." House Appropriations Markup Schedule.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 10:26:53 AM



CBO Monthly Budget Review: May, 2008

The good folks over at the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released their monthly budget review yesterday. Some highlights of the number crunching in the report are below:

The federal government incurred a deficit of about $317 billion during the first eight months of fiscal year 2008, CBO estimates, $168 billion more than the shortfall recorded through May of last year. About $50 billion of that change is due to the distribution to individuals of the tax rebates enacted in the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. That amount is just under half of the total rebates expected for this year; most of the remainder will be disbursed during the next two months.

...

CBO estimates that the federal government recorded a deficit of $165 billion in May, about $97 billion more than the deficit recorded in May 2007. About half of that increase was due to rebate payments, which are recorded as either reductions in revenues or increases in outlays. (When a rebate exceeds an individual's federal income tax payment, the excess is classified as an outlay in the budget.)

...

Outlays were $174 billion higher than in the October-May period last year, far outpacing the $6 billion growth in net revenues...

The broad category of other programs and activities accounted for almost half of the increase in outlays through May. Spending for that category was up by 12.6 percent on an adjusted basis, reflecting an estimated $19 billion in rebate payments as well as double-digit growth in outlays for refundable tax credits, veterans' health programs, unemployment benefits, and food and nutrition services. Defense outlays have also grown rapidly in recent months, rising by 10 percent through May, compared with 7 percent in fiscal year 2007. Much of the growth this year has been driven by a 14 percent increase in spending for military operations, maintenance, and procurement, well above last year's average gain of 8 percent for those activities.

CBO: Monthly Budget Review



Posted by Adam Hughes, 08:32:27 AM



Thursday, June 05, 2008

Nussle on Passage of FY09 Budget Resolution
Translation -- Corrects for Hypocrisy, Hyperbole

Washington, DC — Today, OMB Director Jim Nussle issued the following statement on Senate passage of the FY09 Budget Resolution:

It is disappointing that Democrats in Congress are repeating last year's tax and spend game plan. The Democrat's budget resolution would result in the largest tax increase in our nation's history, adds $25 billion in new spending this year and $209 billion more over 5 years, while failing to address the looming entitlement crisis.

Translation:

It is disappointing that the budget the president submitted to Congress in February repeats last year's tax and spend game, which repeated the same game going back six years (for which I am not responsible). His budget, which projects a budget surplus in four years (when I will not be responsible) based on lugubrious projections no one rightly takes seriously (not even me) will necessitate something like the biggest tax increase in history to yield a surplus that quickly. And it adds $57.8 billion in new spending... and that's just discretionary spending ($929.8 billion for FY08 vs. $987.6 billion for FY09).

Did someone say "entitlement crisis"? What's that?

But seriously, we look forward to the president working closely with Congress over the coming months on the FY09 appropriations bills ... since we trust that he does not want another continuing resolution to permit the next president to undo his handiwork and enact an FY09 budget of his own.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 05:11:15 PM



House Approves FY 2009 Budget Resolution

By a vote of 214-210, the House has approved a spending plan for FY 2009. The $3 trillion budget, adopted by the Senate yesterday, includes $1.013 trillion in discretionary spending and is the first budget to be passed in an election year since 2000.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 02:50:39 PM



DAILY FISCAL POLICY REPORT -- June 5, 2008

Budget -- Senate Adopts FY09 Resolution: In a near-party line vote, the Senate passed a $3.03 trillion budget blueprint yesterday, 48-45. The resolution moves over to the House, which is expected hold a vote on it today. The thorniest long-term fiscal policy questions (about the AMT, extending the Bush tax cuts, etc.) will probably be deferred to the next Congress and the new president, but the appropriations process will at least start by regular order, at least in the House. Statement of Senate Budget Committee chair Kent Conrad (D-ND).

Transparency -- Bipartisan Bill Expanding Contracting Data Introduced: On June 3, Senate sponsors Barack Obama (D-IL), Tom Coburn (R-OK), and John McCain (R-AZ) introduced bipartisan legislation, the Strengthening Transparency and Accountability in Federal Spending Act, to expand the types of information relating to federal spending on government contracts mandated for inclusion on a searchable online database, www.USASpending.gov. The database would now cover "competitive bidding, the range of technically acceptable bids or proposals, the profit incentives offered for each contract, and the complete amount of money awarded, including any options to expand or extend under a contract," said Obama. OMB Watch blog and links.

Taxes -- Questions Surround Senate Extenders Bill: Senate Finance Committee chief Max Baucus (D-MT) said yesterday that the Senate would take up a package extending roughly three dozen tax breaks prior to the July 4 recess. But many important questions remain. What will be the final content of the package, which currently differs markedly with the House package. Will the Finance Committee would take up the bill or will it go directly to the Senate floor? Would the package be paired with an AMT patch? Would the patch and/or the extenders be paid for? Might some extenders be extended for more than one year? Which ones and for how long? Background Story.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 10:44:42 AM



Media Coverage of Obama-Coburn Bill

Below are blog and news stories discussing the introduction yesterday of a new transparency bill cosponsored by Sens. Barack Obama (D-IL) and Tom Coburn (R-OK). Given the bill was introduced at the same time as Obama was wrapping up the Democratic nomination for president, the coverage was not bad.

The bill will likely be marked up in Sen. Carper's (D-DE) subcommittee of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee sometime in the next few weeks and then hopefully move to the floor before the August recess. Sen. McCain (R-AZ) joined this bill shortly before it was introduced as an original cosponsor, dramatically increasing the chance of it passing this year before election year pressures impose gridlock in Congress. Perhaps Obama and McCain will promote the bill in their potential series of town hall meetings - that would definitely give it a boost in Congress.

The Hill: Rivals Obama and McCain work together behind scenes
Sunlight Foundation: USASpending.gov 2.0
OMB Watch: Obama-Coburn Continue Transparency March
POGO: Obama for...Transparency
Chicago Tribune: Obama, McCain agree on transparency
CongressDaily: Obama, McCain Give Boost To Contract Data Legislation

Updated:
DC Examiner: Another revolutionary leap forward for federal spending transparency
Talking Points Memo: Nugget from Behind the Scenes
ThinkProgress: June 5 Think Fast summary

Update II:
Obama and McCain Agree on Transparency
Federal Times: Obama-McCain bill would post federal contracts online



Posted by Adam Hughes, 09:08:23 AM



Wednesday, June 04, 2008

Senate Adopts FY 2009 Budget Resolution

By a 48-45 vote, the Senate approved a $3.03 trillion spending blueprint for FY 2009. The resolution's $1.013 trillion domestic spending level tops the president's request by some $24.5 billion.

CQ ($- sorry):

The conference agreement on the budget blueprint was adopted 48-45 on a largely party-line vote. To accommodate the absences of hospitalized Sens. Edward Kennedy, D- Mass., and Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., Republican Sens. John W. Warner of Virginia and Pete V. Domenici withheld their "no" votes, pairing with the ailing Democrats.

Maine Republican Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia J. Snowe voted for the package, while Democrat Evan Bayh of Indiana voted against it. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., his party's presumptive presidential nominee, voted for the package while his Republican counterpart, John McCain of Arizona, missed the vote. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., Obama's vanquished rival, also missed the vote — although she, like Obama, had spoken earlier in the morning to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee just blocks from the Capitol.

The budget blueprint, drafted solely by Democrats, will serve primarily as an election-year policy statement. Most of the hard choices on spending and tax policy will be deferred to the next Congress and the new president.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 01:54:06 PM



Senate Vote on Budget Resolution Imminent

Sometime around noon today, the U.S. Senate is expected to vote on the FY09 budget resolution that has been in the works for nearly four months. If approved, it would be the first time a budget will have passed in an election year since 2000. The budget, which includes a five-year horizon, would achieve a surplus of $22 billion in FY12 and $10 billion in FY13.

But almost every GOP member of the Senate -- save Maine's Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe -- is expected to oppose the resolution because they have some notion that it contains a really big tax increase necessary to achieve surplus. Budget policy experts and legislative counsel have, to this point, been unable to pinpoint where this provision is embedded in the resolution text.

But it isn't all cloak-and-dagger hide-and-seek. So, one GOP Senator will extend a noteworthy courtesy to Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA), who is recovering from surgery and will not be able to vote. Per Government Executive:
"Another senator will pair with him," said [Senate Budget Committee chair Kent] Conrad, who declined to say who that would be. "Sen. Kennedy isn't here to vote, so under the Senate pairing rule, another senator would withhold his vote. He would be on the opposite side [of the legislation.] It is really a very respectful thing to do so that Sen. Kennedy's absence will not affect the outcome."

OMB Watch will be watching the vote. We've endorsed the resolution and look forward to its swift passage in the Senate today and the House tomorrow.

Posted by Dana Chasin, 10:53:08 AM



Obama-Coburn Continue Transparency March

Sens. Barack Obama (D-IL), Tom Coburn (R-OK), Tom Carper (D-DE), and John McCain (R-AZ) introduced new legislation on June 3 as a follow-up to the 2006 Transparency Act. The bill, the Strengthening Transparency and Accountability in Federal Spending Act (S. 3077), would augment the 2006 law but go further, making important new data more easily accessible to the public and making it easier for citizens to hold our government accountable for the fiscal stewardship of our shared resources.

OMB Watch joined with a host of other good government organizations in offering support for this legislation. OMB Watch's letter of support details the important aspects of the bill and lauds the senators for their latest efforts to make our government more open and accountable to everyone.

It should be interesting to see if this new bill will generate the same amount of chaos, confusion, and excitement that the first bill did that Obama and Coburn worked together on. Stay tuned...



Posted by Adam Hughes, 10:09:54 AM



DAILY FISCAL POLICY REPORT -- June 4, 2008

Taxes -- Extenders to Bypass Senate Finance Cmte.: With the election year compressing the legislative calendar and an underlying conflict on PAYGO simmering in committee, it appears the Senate bill extending expiring tax breaks will bypass the Senate Finance Committee and reach the Senate vote once the climate change bill is voted on. Committee member Mike Crapo (R-ID) warned: "When you bypass the committee, then you basically set up more of a partisan fight on the floor," he said, predicting a filibuster. Senate Extenders Bill Summary.

War Supplemental -- UI Extension may be Dropped House Democrats are likely to drop a 13-week extension of unemployment insurance benefits from a major spending package that includes continued funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and that would create a new education benefit for military veterans. The Senate-approved version of the war spending bill would cost more than $250 billion over 10 years, a price tag that the fiscally conservative caucus of "Blue Dog" House Democrats opposes. Wash. Post.

Transparency -- Levin Seeks Defense Spending Watchdog: Senate Armed Services Committee chair Carl Levin (D-MI) hopes to amend the 2009 defense appropriations bill to create a new senior defense official to oversee Pentagon program cost estimates, in an effort to address the huge overruns plaguing the military's system for buying new weapons and equipment. In a sign that the initiative should receive bipartisan support, the committee's top Republican, Virginia Sen. John Warner, said he would support the move. Wall Street Journal ($)

Posted by Dana Chasin, 09:44:58 AM



Tuesday, June 03, 2008

The Health Care Entitlement That Must Not Be Named

In a post over at inclusionist, Shawn Fremstad makes a crucial point about federal health care spending.

In fact, the 2nd biggest health care entitlement isn't Medicaid, it's the $200+ billion tax break for employer-sponsored health insurance. The health insurance tax break costs around $30 billion more than Medicaid and, if my recollection is correct, is increasing at a faster rate than either Medicaid or Medicare. It's also, unlike Medicare or Medicaid, a regressive tax subsidy that provides more benefits for the wealthy.

As much sweat and tears have been spilled by former Comptroller General David Walker and others pleading American lawmakers to — for the love of Pete — do something! about the coming "entitlement crisis," rare (if ever) is the tax expenditure subsidy for private health care considered part of the problem. This strikes me as a $168 bn oversight (I'm using the number in the Analytical Perspectives in President's FY 2009 budget [Ch. 19].).

But this oversight isn't limited to tax subsidies health insurance. No one seems aware of the other massive entitlement programs like the $100 billion housing subsidy that helps higher-income families buy homes (Filers earning more than $100,000 represent 11% of all filers, but they see 60% of the benefit.).

This general blind spot for tax breaks as subsidies has a deleterious effect on the What To Do About Entitlements conversation, because it disguises the scope of the impending health care crisis. The CBO projects that federal spending on Medicare and Medicaid will be 9 percent of GDP in 2035, causing heart palpitations for the budget-minded. Yet, in that same year all health care spending will capture 31 percent of GDP double today's rate.

Crafting policies aimed at reducing per-unit costs of health care would not only allow all Americans to access more and higher-quality health care, but it would also help avert the a doomsday debt scenario (AKA The Entitlement Crisis®). And as long as we neglect to consider the health insurance subsidy part of the federal health care system, this solution will remain obscured.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 04:57:33 PM



DAILY FISCAL POLICY REPORT -- June 3, 2008

Economy -- Fed Chief Shifts Focus from Slowdown: In a sign that the round of rate-cutting since last summer may be ending, Fed Chief Ben Bernanke indicated more of a concern with inflation in a speech today than with the economic slowndown that has generate months' of speculation about a possible recession in the U.S. Bernanke Speech.

Economy -- Consumers Raid Nest Eggs to Spend: "After a long binge of borrowing, U.S. consumers face a credit crunch and a sagging economy. To sustain their living standards, many Americans are doing what comes naturally: scrambling to raise more cash... Consumer confidence hit a 28-year low in May, according to the latest Reuters/University of Michigan survey of consumer sentiment." Wall Street Journal ($).

And More Economy -- Empty Nest Syndrome: The number of foreclosed homes owned by lenders continues to rise despite signs that they are increasingly willing to slash prices to sell those properties. Lenders and investors in mortgages owned about 660,000 foreclosed homes in April, up from 493,000 in January and 231,000 in January 2007. Wall Street Journal ($).


Source: CQ Today



Posted by Dana Chasin, 10:03:23 AM



Monday, June 02, 2008

JCT Adopts More Logical URL

And now a word from our friends at the Joint Committee on Taxation:

We are pleased to announce that The Joint Committee on Taxation has a new web address: www.jct.gov. We hope that this more logical address will make our website easier for you to remember, and encourage you to visit it frequently. The old address (www.house.gov/jct) is still functional and will continue to work for the time being. Please update your favorites/bookmarks.

The Committee isn't all tax bill cost estimates and technical explanation. Of interest (to some) will be its recent work on tax expenditure theory, for example. Not exactly beach reading, but it amply demonstrates the impressive range of thought the folks over at JCT engage in. In particular, we recommend:



Posted by Dana Chasin, 03:54:36 PM



DAILY FISCAL POLICY REPORT -- June 2, 2008

Congress returns to session today, starting in on a number of key legislative priorities with important fiscal policy implications that leadership hopes to complete before the July 4 recess. Among them, from most to least likely to see action this week:

  • Budget Resolution -- Front and Center: As soon as the farm bill passes (over President's Bush's veto) this week, Congress will turn to the FY 09 budget resolution. A close vote but final passage is expected. Whether the appropriations bills will proceed through regular order or leadership will decide to move instead to a continuing resolution remains to be seen.

  • War Supplemental -- Houses Not in Order: The House and Senate have taken significantly different approached to H.R. 2642, the war funding bill, but the Senate version was passed by veto-proof numbers in the Senate, where many Republicans support the new GI educational benefit; thus far, Democrats have showed no sign of stripping items from the House bill that the White House has said are objectionable.

  • Housing Bill -- Next Step is Senate Floor Action: A bill to prevent foreclosures, create more affordable housing, and reform GSEs was passed by the Senate Banking Committee on May 20 on a bipartisan basis after committee chair Dodd and ranking member Shelby (R-AL) reached a compromise to minimize bill's cost. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has not announced when the bill will go to the floor; that may occur as early as this week.

  • Taxes -- Extenders Schedule to be Extended: On May 21, the House passed a $54 billion package of renewable energy and one-year tax extenders (H.R. 6049). The bill is offset with provisions that have triggered a White House veto threat. The Senate Finance Committee has floated a $110 billion bill (S. 2886) that would extend the measures for two years, would patch the AMT for one year, and does not contain offsets. The Senate will not likely take this bill up until after the July 4 break.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 09:43:42 AM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Ov