HOME
ABOUT US
OUR ISSUES
Federal Budget
Appropriations / Spending
Budget Process
Federal Tax Policy
Estate Tax
Government Performance
Income/Wealth Inequality
Long Range Initiative
Archives
Charts
Economic Indicators
Information & Access
Nonprofit Advocacy
Regulatory Policy
PRESS ROOM
ACTION CENTER
PUBLICATIONS
THE WATCHER
OUR BLOGS
SIGN UP
Receive news, updates, and alerts!
DONATE
Help support our work
OTHER SITES
FedSpending.org
RTK NET
NPAction
Working Group on Community Right-to-Know
Citizens for Sensible Safeguards
Open the Government
Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities
Wednesday, May 31, 2006
Yet another reason not to repeal the estate tax comes to us today from the House Government Reform Committee Minority Office. Yesterday, Ranking Member of the committee Henry Waxman (D-CA) released an analysis showing the huge tax windfalls that estate tax repeal would give to the families of the senior executives of six major oil companies - as if they didn't have enough money already.
The analysis finds the six executives would save a total of $211 million from repeal of the estate tax, with former ExxonMobil chief Lee R. Raymond saving the most by far - $164 million. Raymond recently grabbed headlines for an outrageous $400 million retirement package he received from ExxonMobil.
Last year, a similar analysis done by the committee showed how President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and 11 of the president's cabinet members would save potentially $344 million under an estate tax repeal.
And if you still need convincing the movement to repeal the estate tax is being driven by a very small, completely self-interested group of disgustingly wealthy individuals, look no further than a new analysis from United for a Fair Economy and Public Citizen, showing how 18 wealthy families have poured tens of millions of dollars into a lobbying and public relations campaign to repeal the estate tax - an act that would save them a combined $71 BILLION.
If you are outraged at the greed and selfishness of these of people who seem to have no limit to the lengths they will go to hoard more wealth, email your Senator immediately and tell them to preserve the estate tax.
Check out this column, Estate Tax Lunacy, in today's Washington Post. Harold Meyerson succinctly sums up the estate tax situation while disspelling some of the most egregious myths about the tax.
Wednesday, May 24, 2006
Senate aides said yesterday that estate tax repeal will likely be the third order of business to come up when the Senate returns after the Memorial Day recess. The Senate will vote on full repeal, and after that likely fails, it is Senator Jon Kyl's (R-AZ) intention to bring his "reform" plan up for a vote. His plan is little better than full repeal as it would attain very little of the actual revenue garnered from the estate tax.
Take action on this issue! Contact your Senators and tell them to vote no on repeal and no on Kyl's fiscally irresponsible alternative.
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
The Hill is running a terribly misinformed op-ed today on the estate tax. The op-ed, which actually calls the victims of the estate tax "real and tragic" in the first paragraph, only gets worse from there. (I personally would not call the situation of any multimillionaire "tragic," but some people like to put a little flair in their writing).
One of the biggest myths perpetuated in this column is the author's assertion that "the estate tax does not even generate much income for the federal government." Estate tax repeal would actually result in a $1 trillion revenue loss for the federal government over a ten-year period. During a time when the government is struggling to shave a couple hundred billion off the budget deficit, it seems like an additional trillion dollar hit would hurt. A lot.
The author of this article, Barbara Kasoff, is the President of an organization called Women Impacting Public Policy. The group claims to be advocates "for and on behalf of women and minorities in business," but really is far more interested in promoting radically conservative economic policies, such as full repeal of the estate tax. It is no coincidence that one of the group's founding members, Pat Soldano, is an extremely wealthy estate planner as well as the President and owner of the Policy and Taxation Group which advocates for the full repeal of the estate tax through lobbying legislators and executive branch officials.
Soldano is profiled in the recent Public Citizen/United for a Fair Economy report on the estate tax. The report names her as "the lobbyist who has represented at least seven of the [extremely wealthy and powerful anti-tax] families, played a central role in the formation of a massive anti-estate tax alliance — the Family Business Estate Tax Coalition — that has served as the main coordinator of the repeal campaign." More information on Soldano and WIPP is available in the report on page 15.
For a much more comprehensive, fair, and balanced article on the estate tax, check out this article which appeared today in KnoxNews. Also see the latest Watcher article on the estate tax.
Tuesday, May 02, 2006
The anti-tax troops are out in full force on Capitol Hill today, participating in the annual Death Tax Summit which includes lobby visits and speeches from prominent GOP Senators. The National Association of Manufacturers' website states:
Small and medium sized manufacturers are invited to participate in the annual Summit for Permanent Death Tax Repeal in Washington, DC on May 2. The fly-in will include representatives from small businesses in all sectors, many of which belong to organizations, like NAM, that participate in the Family Business Estate Tax Coalition. During the day-long event, family business owners will meet with Members of Congress to discuss the impact of the death tax on their ability to create jobs, invest in needed capital improvements, and continue giving to their local community.
We got word that at the events this morning, Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) was blunt with the repeal advocate that they did not have close to enough votes for repeal. He also alluded to the fact that if his compromise wasn't accepted now, things could get much worse for their efforts, particularly after November. Majority Leader Frist also cancelled his appearance at the summit this morning, the reasons are still unclear as to why he did this.
More on Kyl's comments can be read in this Washington Post story.
Latest Entries by Theme
All Themes
Appropriations & Spending
Budget Projections
State Fiscal Policy
Watcher
Entitlements
Debt & Deficit
Oversight & Enforcement
Transparency
Privatization
Contact Us
Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax
Notes from the Economy: Jobs and Unemployment
Transparency Act Legacy Spreads to the States
Talk of a Lame Duck Session
Bush Admin Helps Out Big Beef
Bush Admin Takes Aim at Unionization
CBPP: Taxes on the Rich Don't Hurt Small Businesses
A Swing and a Miss on Tax Evasion
Forthcoming: EPI's The State of Working America, 2008/2009
The Executive Pay Pie: Extra Large Slices and Topped with Tax Subsidies
A Bridge for Sale: Contracting Problems Continue
Archived Entries for Estate Tax
September
August
July
June
March
February
January
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
November, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
January, 2005
July, 2004
June, 2004
May, 2004
April, 2004
March, 2004
February, 2004
January, 2004
December, 2003
November, 2003
October, 2003
July, 2003