HOME
ABOUT US
OUR ISSUES
Federal Budget
Appropriations / Spending
Budget Process
Federal Tax Policy
Estate Tax
Government Performance
Income/Wealth Inequality
Long Range Initiative
Archives
Charts
Economic Indicators
Information & Access
Nonprofit Advocacy
Regulatory Policy
PRESS ROOM
ACTION CENTER
PUBLICATIONS
THE WATCHER
OUR BLOGS
SIGN UP
Receive news, updates, and alerts!
DONATE
Help support our work
OTHER SITES
FedSpending.org
RTK NET
NPAction
Working Group on Community Right-to-Know
Citizens for Sensible Safeguards
Open the Government
Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities
Thursday, April 05, 2007
State Medicaid administrators have been telling state children's health insurance programs (SCHIP) to back off outreach efforts, Inside CMS ($) reports today.
The crux of the issue is that when SCHIP programs do outreach, they tend to find and sign up children and adults not only for SCHIP, but for Medicaid, as well.
Medicaid is an entitlement program whose costs are determined largely by the number and type of participant. When more people sign up for Medicaid, it's mandated by law to provide services, and costs go up. (SCHIP is not an entitlement program. States can deny services to eligible children if they do not have enough resources available.)
States and the federal government split the cost of both SCHIP and Medicaid- 85 federal/15 state and 65 federal/35 state, respectively. So states are mandated to pay a lot more when people sign up for Medicaid- hence the resistance to SCHIP outreach that attracts new Medicaid participants.
With rising medical costs and smaller tax bases, states nationwide have been scaling down outreach, as many state administrators quoted in the article attested to.
"I don't think that states are doing the kind of out there, in-your-face campaigns that they were doing at the beginning of the program," said another state Medicaid official. "Hopefully, through the reauthorization process, some of these concerns can get addressed," the official told Inside CMS.
This may help explain why enrollment in SCHIP has not increased substantially in recent years, and perhaps why Medicaid costs did not increase this year. Recall also that states have been cutting Medicaid costs by requiring "proof of citizenship" documentation that low-income citizens often do not have. Is this arbitrary, unfair way of discouraging eligible Medicaid recipients really the way we want to control Medicaid costs?
If legislators design an expansion of the SCHIP program this year, they should consider how Medicaid cost concerns can influence SCHIP rolls. Otherwise, states may not vigorously pursue new SCHIP enrollees, and too many children will still lack proper health care.
Latest Entries by Theme
All Themes
Appropriations & Spending
Budget Projections
State Fiscal Policy
Watcher
Entitlements
Debt & Deficit
Oversight & Enforcement
Transparency
Privatization
Contact Us
Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax
CBO Projects Largest Deficit in History
The Cost of TARP, Dollars and Opportunity
House Approves, Bush Signs Bailout Bill
Timely CTJ Report Pushes for Reagan Tax Proposal
FedSpending.org Will Blow Your Mind
Senate Approves Bailout; Cost "Impossible" to Predict
Interesting Perspectives on the Bailout
Senate Attempts to Sweeten Bailout Bill
Under the Radar: Congress Finishes FY 2009 Approps
Next Move After House Fails to Pass Wall Street Bailout Uncertain
Archived Entries for State Fiscal Policy
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
December, 2007
November, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
August, 2006
February, 2006
November, 2005
October, 2005
September, 2005
July, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
November, 2003
August, 2003
July, 2003