HOME
ABOUT US
OUR ISSUES
Federal Budget
Appropriations / Spending
Budget Process
Federal Tax Policy
Estate Tax
Government Performance
Income/Wealth Inequality
Long Range Initiative
Archives
Charts
Economic Indicators
Information & Access
Nonprofit Advocacy
Regulatory Policy
PRESS ROOM
ACTION CENTER
PUBLICATIONS
THE WATCHER
OUR BLOGS
SIGN UP
Receive news, updates, and alerts!
DONATE
Help support our work
OTHER SITES
FedSpending.org
RTK NET
NPAction
Working Group on Community Right-to-Know
Citizens for Sensible Safeguards
Open the Government
Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities
Thursday, May 22, 2008
The state of state budgets continues to deteriorate around the country. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities released another update yesterday to their increasingly disturbing analysis, which now shows that 31 states are anticipating budget problems in 2009, with 27 projecting a budget shortfall. We continue to reiterate that this is pretty bad news as state budgets are far less flexible than the federal budget and usually are legally prohibited from running a deficit. From the CBPP update: 31 states anticipate budget problems. Of those: 27 states and the District of Columbia faced or are facing $47 billion in combined '09 budget shortfalls. Arkansas and Michigan join this list. 2 states face '09 deficits, but have released no further information. (Connecticut joins this list. Louisiana and Michigan leave.) 2 other states project budget gaps for 2010 and beyond. (Connecticut leaves this list.)
The state of state budgets continues to deteriorate around the country. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities released another update yesterday to their increasingly disturbing analysis, which now shows that 31 states are anticipating budget problems in 2009, with 27 projecting a budget shortfall. We continue to reiterate that this is pretty bad news as state budgets are far less flexible than the federal budget and usually are legally prohibited from running a deficit. From the CBPP update:
31 states anticipate budget problems. Of those: 27 states and the District of Columbia faced or are facing $47 billion in combined '09 budget shortfalls. Arkansas and Michigan join this list. 2 states face '09 deficits, but have released no further information. (Connecticut joins this list. Louisiana and Michigan leave.) 2 other states project budget gaps for 2010 and beyond. (Connecticut leaves this list.)
CBPP: 27 STATES FACE TOTAL BUDGET SHORTFALL OF AT LEAST $47 BILLION IN 2009
Friday, May 16, 2008
Shawn Fremstad posted yesterday on a new paper released this month by John Schmitt over at the Center for Economic and Policy Research. The paper studies the impact unions have on income and has some interesting findings: Using national data for 2003 through 2007, we estimate that unionization raises the wages of the typical low-wage worker (one in the 10th percentile) by 20.6 percent, compared to 13.7 percent for the typical worker (one in the 50th percentile), and 6.1 percent for the typical high-wage worker (one in the 90th percentile). The traditional statistical approach applied to the same data produces an estimate of the average union wage premium of 11.9 percent, which is substantially lower than the union effect on low-wage workers (20.6 percent) and somewhat below the effect for the median- wage worker (13.7 percent).
Using national data for 2003 through 2007, we estimate that unionization raises the wages of the typical low-wage worker (one in the 10th percentile) by 20.6 percent, compared to 13.7 percent for the typical worker (one in the 50th percentile), and 6.1 percent for the typical high-wage worker (one in the 90th percentile). The traditional statistical approach applied to the same data produces an estimate of the average union wage premium of 11.9 percent, which is substantially lower than the union effect on low-wage workers (20.6 percent) and somewhat below the effect for the median- wage worker (13.7 percent).
Read the full report.
Thursday, May 08, 2008
The New York Times reports today that the Vallejo (CA) City Council voted unanimously Tuesday night to declare bankruptcy in the face of dwindling tax revenues, the housing market meltdown and a faltering economy. Vallejo has 117,000 residents.
Given the steep decrease in property and sales taxes and transfer fees as a result of weakness in the housing market, municipal bankruptcy is "something that one hears about a lot more now," said John Quigley, a professor of economics at University of California, Berkeley. "And in California, you hear about a lot of cities being pushed to this sort of thinking by the housing crisis."
"We've been doing more with less forever," said Detective Mat Mustard, vice president of the Vallejo Police Officers Association, which opposed the bankruptcy declaration. "We're going to start losing people. Who wants to work for a company or a city that's bankrupt?"
Latest Entries by Theme
All Themes
Appropriations & Spending
Budget Projections
State Fiscal Policy
Watcher
Entitlements
Debt & Deficit
Oversight & Enforcement
Transparency
Privatization
Contact Us
Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax
Approps Update: Senate Back to Work
OMB Releases FY 2008 Earmarks Data
DPC Hearing on Iraq Contracting This Week
Monthly Budget Review: June, 2008
Congress to End White House Forest Conservation Program
Fiscal Policy Agenda Returns to Washington
Bush Signs War Supplemental
BudgetBlog on Hiatus for Holiday: Happy Fourth Everyone!
The Heat Must Be Getting to Them
GAO Report Finds Private Medicare Providers Prefer Profits Over Providing Better Service
Archived Entries for State Fiscal Policy
June
May
April
March
February
January
December, 2007
November, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
August, 2006
February, 2006
November, 2005
October, 2005
September, 2005
July, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
November, 2003
August, 2003
July, 2003