HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Thursday, April 20, 2006

Post Editorial: Reality and Taxes

The Washington Post editorial board responds to a member of the Virginia House of Delegate's comments that Virginia is a highly-taxed state and thus should not raise taxes in order to meet the state's critical priorities.

Washington Post: Reality and Taxes



Posted by Becky Lewis, 02:26:04 PM



Wednesday, April 19, 2006

Surprise, Surprise: Bush Tax Cuts Mainly Benefit Wealthy

As we've said time and again, one of the main reasons why the Bush tax cuts are so egregious -- besides the fact that they are draining the Treasury of revenues and causing important federal programs to get squeezed -- is the that the beneficiaries of these tax cuts are overwhelmingly the very richest people in our society. As this well-written article puts it, "things will get even worse if the Bush administration gets its way. That’s because one key part of the Bush administration’s tax cuts--eliminating the estate tax--hasn’t gone into effect yet." This is an excellent point; estate tax repeal would only further slant tax cut benefits towards the wealthiest.

The article includes a number of other great points and facts on taxes; I've included a few of them below.


  • Those in the top 1 percent income bracket are expected to get an average tax cut of $39,000 in 2006--or 52 times more than households at the middle of the income ladder. Those with incomes over $1 million will receive an average tax cut of more than $111,000.
  • Because of lowered tax rates on investment income, taxpayers with annual incomes more than $10 million paid about the same share of their income in income taxes as those making $200,000 to $500,000.
  • The 181,000 Americans with annual incomes of $1 million or more--about one-tenth of 1 percent of all taxpayers--reaped 43 percent of all the savings on investment taxes in 2003, about $41,400 per person.
  • In contrast, the 71 percent of tax filers with incomes less than $50,000 saved $10 each from the capital gains and dividend tax cuts, adding only 2 percent to their $425 average tax reduction in 2003.


Posted by Becky Lewis, 12:40:52 PM



Tuesday, April 18, 2006

Grassley to Everson: Consider Free Filing Through IRS

Finance Committee Chair Charles Grassley (R-IA) sent a letter to IRS Commissioner Mark Everson April 13 regarding online tax filing, and specifically, his recommendations for reforming it. While the IRS currently provides a free online filing service to qualified individuals (those with adjusted gross incomes of $50,000 or less) throught the "Free File Alliance," Grassley is "looking into allowing" the IRS to provide a free, electronic direct filing service to all taxpayers.

In the letter, according to the BNA trade pub, Grassley "urged Everson to rein in commercial offers and charges for basic services charged by the alliance, noting that a new staff analysis by his committee indicates some of the services are not free, and include hidden charges and 'get rich quick schemes.'" They indicated that some companies participating in the Alliance use the Free File web site to market other products and services. Grassley wants to ensure that these "free" services are really free, saying, "An underlying principle of the Free File Alliance is that no one should be forced to pay to electronically file a tax return. That principle has been and continues to erode."



Posted by Becky Lewis, 10:48:15 AM



Monday, April 17, 2006

Washington Post On Congress' Tax Gimmickry

Following up on a OMB Watch Budget Blog posting late last month, the Washington Post has an excellent editorial in this morning's paper criticizing Congress for "resorting to a [tax] gimmick that is even more egregious than their usual tactics."

The only way for the folks over at the Post to improve this editorial is to correctly identify this gimmick as a GOP proposal and not hide behind the general moniker of 'Congress.' As important as it is for all members of Congress to be honest about the impact of their policy proposals, it is equally important for the media to call a spade a spade. This tax gimmick is a purely GOP idea to finagle passage of a GOP tax cut that Democrats do not support.

It is still possible for the Senate parliamentarian to rule against this tax gimmick when Congress returns next week, then forcing the Senate to muster a more difficult 60 votes to approve the bill rather than simply 50. Unfortunately, that is the only way this bill won't eventually pass into law.

Washington Post: Tax Gimmickry



Posted by Adam Hughes, 10:51:10 AM



Who Is Doing Your Taxes?

Interesting article yesterday from the Associated Press about who prepares the tax forms for the members of Congress who are responsible for writing the tax code. Turns out three out of the top four lawmakers in Congress who have jurisdiction over the U.S. tax code use private preparers to file their tax returns. The lawmaker who still prepares his own taxes is Rep. Bill Thomas (R-CA), who chairs the Ways and Means Committee.

About sixty percent of Americans use a private preparation company or service when it comes to filing their own returns.

Associated Press: Tax Law Writers Rely on Pros for Returns



Posted by Adam Hughes, 09:58:53 AM



Monday, April 10, 2006

NPP: Where Do You Tax Dollars Go?

Last week the National Priorities Project released their annual publication Where Do Your Tax Dollars Go? The publication shows how the median income family's income tax dollars are spent for every state and 200 cities, towns and counties. It also looks at the shift in how tax dollars were spent in 2005 compared with 2000. For example, NPP has found that the military's share of the income tax dollar has risen by 20 percent since 2000, while the share of spending has dropped for job training (-21 percent), environment (-19 percent), housing (-7 percent) and veteran's benefits (-2 percent).



Posted by Becky Lewis, 05:26:15 PM



Friday, April 07, 2006

Congressional Twilight Zone

Despite a flurry of last minute negotiations and abundant rumors from Capitol Hill, GOP negotiators could not find a compromise on the long-delayed 2005 tax reconciliation bill before they left Washington for a two-week recess. Both the president and GOP leaders in Congress made a push to reach consensus on the bill before the upcoming tax filing deadline on April 15.

This was the second positive piece of fiscal news coming out of Congress in less than the span of a few hours yesterday afternoon. Those kinds of days have been few and far between in Washington recently and have convinced many veteran Capitol Hill watchers that perhaps, just for a short time, Congress moved beyond sight and sound and briefly passed into the twilight zone at some point yesterday afternoon. As of this posting however, that was still unconfirmed...

Maybe Congress will now re-instate pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) rules and complete a fiscally responsible trifecta?






House GOP Attempts To Pass Budget Fail

In a surprising collapse late yesterday afternoon, the House GOP leadership pulled the 2007 budget resolution from floor consideration and gave up any efforts to pass the bill before the two-week April recess. Lacking the votes to pass the resolution, new GOP Majority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) failed in his first major test as head of the new leadership team in the House.

Boehner had made statements earlier this week vowing to pass a budget before the recess or abandon efforts to pass one at all. On April 4, he asked rhetorically, "If we don't do it this week, why do it at all?"

The straw that broke the camels back was a provision to require authorization from the Budget Committee for any emergency disaster relief appropriations in excess of $4.3 billion. This budget cap was heavily pushed by conservatives over the past few weeks (along with other harsh budget process changes) in exchange for their support on the budget resolution. But inclusion of this cap forced Appropriations Committee Chairman Jerry Lewis (R-CA) to withdraw his suppport and lobby the other 35 members of his commmittee to do the same.

While it is unclear if the House Majority Leader will hold to his earlier comments about abandoning efforts to pass a budget resolution, it may make little difference at this point. With the House GOP caucus now split into multiple factions and with united Democratic opposition, it seems more unlikely Congress will pass a budget now than perhaps at any other time this year.

And without the ability to pass a budget, the Republican Party continues to pull apart at the seams and has become a majority party withouth the ability to govern. While before they could muster the support to pass an irresponsible and reckless budget, this year, they may not be able to pass any budget at all.

Here's hoping they don't...

Washington Post: GOP Budget Talks Collaspe In House
NY Times: House Republicans Abandon Budget Effort

Posted by Adam Hughes, 10:19:54 AM



Thursday, April 06, 2006

2005 Tax Reconciliation Nears Deal?

Believe it or not, rumors are floating down from Capitol Hill that conferees to the reckless 2005 tax reconciliation bill may have finally reached agreement on a bill they hope will pass both chambers. The Congress has been working on this bill for well over a year and it was starting to look like they would not be able to reach consensus.

While no deal has been announced and time is running out this week before a two-week recess, the conferees may push a bill that extends reduced rates on capital gain and dividends - overwhelmingly benefiting super wealthy Americans - and a one year "patch" for the Alternative Minimum Tax. Other popular provisions, such as the business research and development tax credit and other items expiring this year would move in a seperate bill.

There are still hurdles to overcome for the bill, such as a budget point of order that will surely be raised by Democrats in the Senate (since the bill violates a Senate rule prohibiting increasing the deficit outside of the bill's five-year budget window), and the possibility enough Senators may oppose the entire bill (a long-shot, but a possibility).

Conferees and GOP leaders would like to finish the bill before the recess and the arbitrary and entirely symbolic deadline for filing tax returns on April 15 - but with only two days left, that may involve keeping both chambers in session into the weekend.



Posted by Adam Hughes, 09:00:27 AM



Wednesday, April 05, 2006

Richest of the Rich Win With Investment Tax Cuts

Absolutely fantastic article by David Cay Johnston on the front page of the New York Times today showing how enormously skewed the Bush tax cuts on capital gains and dividends are toward the richest of the rich in America.

The Times did their own analysis of IRS data from 2003 with some shocking conclusions. A few excerpts below:

Among taxpayers with incomes greater than $10 million, the amount by which their investment tax bill was reduced averaged about $500,000 in 2003

This super-rich group of taxpayers (can you even imagine making $10 million in income in one lifetime let alone one year?) paid about the same percentage of their income in income taxes as those making between $200,000 and $500,000 because of the cuts in taxes on investments. So much for our progressive tax structure.

More from Johnston:
Americans with annual incomes of $1 million or more, about one-tenth of 1 percent all taxpayers, reaped 43 percent of all the savings on investment taxes in 2003. The savings for these taxpayers averaged about $41,400 each.

Incidentally, the $41,400 those taxpayers averaged in savings in 2003 just on their investment income is only slightly lower than the median household income in America in 2004, which was $44,389. Johnston later shares an estimate done by the ever-reliable Citizens for Tax Justice showing the average savings many of those average income households - those taxpayers making under $50,000 - received from the same investment tax cuts: $10!

Don't miss the interactive charts and graphics that accompany the article. This analysis is top notch!



Posted by Adam Hughes, 12:46:18 PM



More Bad News For Private Tax Preparers

On the heels of some negative publicity private companies have received in the aftermath of two controversial issues over at the IRS - regarding a decision to change the rules governing the privacy rights of citizen's tax return information and a new program outsourcing collection of overdue taxes - more bad news came out of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) yesterday for paid tax preparation companies such as H&R Block.

During a Senate Finance Committee hearing yesterday on the costs of filing tax return, the GAO shared some fairly shocking results from a study they did on the accuracy of returns completed by private tax preparers. The report showcases results of GAO investigators who used a paid preparer to file their tax returns and found that the returns suffered from errors and "willful or reckless disregard of tax rules." (read highlights of the report or the entire report.)

GAO also found of the 19 tax returns in the study, the preparer made major mistakes in eight of them, awarding extra refunds in excess of $2000 in six of the cases and in two of the cases, costing the taxpayer over $1500. The other returns also contained moderate to serious errors and showcased imcompetence on the part of the preparer. Had these been actual tax returns, the preparation company would be subject to fines and penalties according to the IRS - but only if the IRS spotted the errors.

Kind of makes you want to file your own tax return this year, huh?

Minneapolis Star-Tribune (AP): Tax Preparation Training Standards Sought


Posted by Adam Hughes, 12:21:29 PM



Tuesday, April 04, 2006

Outsourcing of IRS Creates Private Company Infighting

Following up on a previous posting from last week, an article that ran yesterday in govexec.com reported that two private collection companies have filed a complaint with the General Accountability Office (GAO) protesting the selection of a third firm (Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson) to receive a contract to collect outstanding taxes owed to the IRS.

Apparently a former partner with Linegarger Goggan Blair & Sampson pleaded guilty in 2004 of bribing San Antonio City Councilmembers in return for contracts to collect overdue city fees. The good folks at Diversified Collection Services of Livermore, CA and GC Services of Houston, TX think the IRS should have taken that into more consideration than they did in awarding contracts (read: you should have picked us). Those two groups were not selected for contracts by the IRS, but have said their protest seeks merely to understand the selection process and how it was implemented.

I'm sure the fact that the companies selected for contracts would be able to keep up to 25 percent of the taxes they collected has nothing to do with their disappointment in losing out on the contracts and this simply is a quest for the truth! (hmph!)

This isn't chump change we're talking about either. The IRS has admitted hiring private firms to collect the taxes costs significantly more for the government than simply hiring more staff at the IRS to collect the revenue themselves. As Rep. Steve Rothman angrily pointed out during an appropriations hearing last week, ""The IRS wastes up to 25% on commissions to private collection agencies rather than save more than $30 million [each year] by hiring federal employees to do the work instead."

It's amazing lengths private companies are willing to go to in order to drag skeletons out of the closet when $30 million is put up for grabs. This outsourcing plan seems to be working perfectly - a true vision of efficiency!



Posted by Adam Hughes, 04:57:15 PM



Bankrupt Nation!

OMB Watch Director of Federal Fiscal Policy Adam Hughes wrote an opinion piece explaining how the current Congressional budget proposals reveal a Republican Party in denial about the nation's poor fiscal health. The op-ed appeared this morning on www.tompaine.com.

Tompaine.com: Bankrupt Nation



Posted by Adam Hughes, 01:44:07 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Obama Selects Chief Performance Officer

Business Cuts as Stimulus: Somewhat Less Than Effective

CBO 2009 Deficit Projection Tops $1 Trillion

Gates Opines on 2009 War Spending

Details of New House Rules Package

The Case for Tax Cuts in the Recovery Package

Economic Package Details Coming Into View

Douglas Elmendorf Tapped as CBO Chief

Commission Proposals Being Pushed From Day 1

We Wish You a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays

Archived Entries for Federal Tax Policy

January

December, 2008

November, 2008

October, 2008

September, 2008

August, 2008

July, 2008

June, 2008

May, 2008

April, 2008

March, 2008

February, 2008

January, 2008

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004

June, 2004

January, 2004

December, 2003

November, 2003

September, 2003

August, 2003

July, 2003