HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Wednesday, January 23, 2008

House Tries, Fails at SCHIP Expansion Veto Override

The Republican War on Children's Health continues($).

The House failed Wednesday to override President Bush's second veto of a children's health insurance bill, again confounding Democrats' plans to expand government-sponsored health coverage to include an additional four million low-income kids.

The override failed 260-152, 15 votes short of the two-thirds majority required. Democrats wound up no closer to enacting their signature health policy proposal than they were in October, when their attempt to override Bush's first veto failed by 13 votes. In fact, Democrats lost ground since they passed the second bill Oct. 25 by 265-142, because three Democrats and two Republicans who supported that bill were absent for Wednesday's vote

Roll call here.

Rep. Jim Marshall (D-GA) was the lone Democratic 'nay' vote.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 02:42:22 PM



Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Samuelson Watch: This Week - He's Cynical, Yet Completely Lacking in Empathy

I don't know where to start with this week's Samuelson column ("Lollipop Economics"). It's a mess. I guess the quality control person at the Post had the day off.

As expected, Samuelson devotes another chunk of prime pundit real estate to heft the long term fiscal imbalance on the shoulders of the Baby Boom generation and their impending retirement. This is, of course, just wrong, wrong, wrong. As has been documented numerous times, the fiscal challenges of the next fifty years lay squarely in the rapidly raising cost of health care.

The premise this time for his Social Security bashing is Washington's current obsession with fiscal stimulus. Samuelson's main point is that a $100 billion economic jump-start is nothing more than an election-year gimmick aimed at bribing voters. That Samuelson fails to recognize that good politics and good policy are not mutually exclusive is simple-minded, and absolutely cynical when literally thousands could be affected by it. However, he also objects to fiscal stimulus on the grounds that:

  1. Such a package is too small to do any good ("something much larger is needed")
  2. 1.1 million lost jobs is no big whoop ("a setback, but not a disaster")
  3. This recession is different than others ("Only time and patience will cure some economic problems")
  4. And besides, recessions are good ("[they] dampen prices and incipient inflationary psychology")

Wow. Logically Samuelson cannot simultaneous believe (A) and (C). And while (B) and (D) are complimentary, they underscore his total lack of concern for people.

UPDATE: I hope Congress listens to the Congressional Budget Office, and not Samuelson, when it says:

[T]o add three-quarters of a percentage point to the growth rate of GDP over a year, it might be necessary to increase the budget deficit for the year by close to three-quarters of 1 percent of GDP, or about $100 billion.


Posted by Craig Jennings, 12:55:28 PM



Tuesday, January 15, 2008

Bush Backs Off Social Security Reform
Bob Samuelson must be crying ($):

President Bush said in late 2007 that Social Security reform awaits the election of the next president, effectively deferring any action on reform before 2009.

The biggest issue for the next president will be entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, Bush said Nov. 7 in an interview with German television reporters.

"[I]t's very hard to get done because a lot of the politicians here in America really don't want to confront the problem until it becomes immediate," Bush said. "So I tried for seven years to get Congress to do the hard work. They didn't want to, and so the next president is going to have to try to do it."



Posted by Craig Jennings, 09:42:34 AM



Friday, January 11, 2008

Contact Us!

Questions, comments, suggestions, and glad tidings can now be directed to the BudgetBlog inbox at:

(In an effort to prevent spam, our contact address appears as an image and without a link to the address.)

Posted by Craig Jennings, 11:49:37 AM



Monday, January 07, 2008

The Bush Administration Still Doesn't Care About Children

Bush is preventing some states from opening up Medicaid to more children. The New York Times:

The Bush administration is imposing restrictions on the ability of states to expand eligibility for Medicaid, in an effort to prevent them from offering coverage to families of modest incomes who, the administration argues, may have access to private health insurance.

The restrictions mirror those the administration placed on the State Children's Health Insurance Program in August after states tried to broaden eligibility for it as well.

Until now, states had generally been free to set their own Medicaid eligibility criteria, and the Bush administration had not openly declared that it would apply the August directive to Medicaid. State officials in Louisiana, Ohio and Oklahoma said they had discovered the administration's intent in negotiations with the federal government over the last few weeks.



Posted by Matt Lewis, 12:53:26 PM



Wednesday, January 02, 2008

SCHIP Extended, But Won't Be Expanded For A While

President Bush signed a short-term extension of the State Children's Health Insurance Program last Saturday. The bill is supposed to ensure that nobody will be cut from the program as it is now, but it also makes expanding it a non-issue until 2009, since the extension lasts until April 2009.

In other words, the 4 million children who would have been covered under the vetoed SCHIP expansion will go without health insurance for at least another year, thanks to the president and the conservative coalition in the House.



Posted by Matt Lewis, 10:52:20 AM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Obama Selects Chief Performance Officer

Business Cuts as Stimulus: Somewhat Less Than Effective

CBO 2009 Deficit Projection Tops $1 Trillion

Gates Opines on 2009 War Spending

Details of New House Rules Package

The Case for Tax Cuts in the Recovery Package

Economic Package Details Coming Into View

Douglas Elmendorf Tapped as CBO Chief

Commission Proposals Being Pushed From Day 1

We Wish You a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays

Archived Entries for Entitlements

January

December, 2008

November, 2008

September, 2008

August, 2008

July, 2008

June, 2008

May, 2008

April, 2008

March, 2008

February, 2008

January, 2008

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

August, 2006

June, 2006

February, 2006

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

August, 2003