Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Thursday, April 24, 2008

House Moves Bill to Stop Medicaid Changes

Yesterday the House passed a bill that would stop the Bush administration from going forward with several regulations intended to cut Medicaid services. The administration developed the regulations under the guise of "fiscal integrity," arguing state Medicaid programs are using loopholes to inappropriately claim federal funds. Bush has threatened to veto the bill.

Fortunately, the bill passed the House in a 349-62 vote which, if the margin holds, would be enough to override a veto. State governments also support the bill. According to the Associated Press, "The governors of all 50 states…oppose the rules."

If all this bipartisanship and widespread agreement make you uncomfortable, fear not — the U.S. Senate is on the case.

Click here to read more

Posted by Matt Madia, 11:25:23 AM



Wednesday, April 23, 2008

OMB Watch Statement on FY 2009 Budget

OMB Watch released a statement on April 22 on the FY 2009 budget resolution negotiations. The statement urges both House and Senate negotiators to uphold the fiscally responsible principles promised by Democrats when they took over the majority in 2006. A key aspect of the ongoing budget negotiations is whether to offset the $70 billion cost of a one-year fix to the creep of the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). The House version of the resolution offsets the costs while the Senate does not.

OMB Watch was intensely critical of the president and Congress, particularly the Senate, at the end of last year when they abandoned PAYGO and passed a fix to the AMT that added over $50 billion to the tab of future generations. Congress has the opportunity to reverse course on this issue this week and make the difficult, but correct, choice to pay for their priorities. Let's hope they are able to muster the courage to do the right thing.



Posted by Adam Hughes, 10:04:38 AM



Monday, April 21, 2008

SCHIP Rules Imposed in 2007 Violated Law

The Government Accountability Office and the Congressional Research Service have concluded that rule changes imposed by the Bush administration on the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in 2007 violated federal law: BNA reports:

In legal opinions released April 18, the Government Accountability Office and the Congressional Research Service said the SCHIP guidance is a rule for purposes of the Congressional Review Act (CRA) and so violates statutory requirements for congressional notice and review.

The Congressional Review Act was passed in 1996 and serves to keep Congress informed of rulemaking activities at federal agencies and makes sure those rules are submitted to Congress and the Comptroller General before they take effect. In this case, the SCHIP rules were published and used to deny a request by New York State to expand its SCHIP coverage to children from higher-income families (up to 250 percent of poverty, or $44,000 for a family of 3).

Unfortunately, $44,000 isn't a lot of money for a family of three in many parts of New York State, particularly NYC. Come to think of it, that isn't a lot of money for a family of three in many parts of the United States. Considering the prices of health care these days, restricting access to SCHIP for families in NY was an unfortunately decision from the Bush administration. This latest development gives some hope that it can be overturned.

Read the Opinions:
GAO Opinion
CRS Opinion

Posted by Adam Hughes, 09:37:46 AM



Thursday, April 17, 2008

Bill to Stop Medicaid Regs Moves Forward

A bill to delay seven regulations that would eliminate or severely cut Medicaid health care programs won unanimous approval yesterday in the House Energy and Commerce Committee by a vote of 46 - 0. The top Senate Republican on this topic - Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) - opposes the House bill despite overwhelming bipartisan support for it. Grassley prefers to amend the regulations rather than postpone for a year. House Energy and Commerce Ranking Member Joe Barton (R-TX) is confident the bill will pass both chambers and also that there is sufficient support to override a possible veto from the White House. Health and Human Services Secretary Leavitt has sent a letter to the House committee this past Tuesday saying he would recommend a veto (read the letter)

The proposed regulations would end up transferring up to $50 billion in costs for the Medicaid program to states. These regulations would have eliminated payments for Medicaid-related administrative activities at schools and specialized medical transportation services for children and hospital outpatient services. They would also have restricted rehabilitation payments and slashed states' ability to provide case management services for disabled beneficiaries.

Having a bill that opposes an administration initiative passed out of a House committee by a vote of 46 - 0 is a pretty strong start. At this point it looks like Barton, et al, are right - Grassley is swimming up stream on this one.



Posted by Adam Hughes, 09:09:04 AM



Thursday, April 10, 2008

Health Care Spending - It's Not the Aging of the Population

If policy makers are truly interested in fixing the Entitlement Crisis™, they need to look at the factors that are pushing the federal budget along an unsustainable path. As we've noted before, Social Security has minor financing issues, but its full-benefit operation does not pose a threat to long-term fiscal fitness. Medicare, however, does. And while it is tempting to indict the aging of the Baby Boom generation for fueling rapid increases in health care costs, policy makers would be wrong to set out to simply reduce benefits and/or increase Medicare premiums as a fix. Instead, they should focus their efforts on the supply side of health care, rather than increased demand resulting from the aging of the population.



Continue reading...

Posted by Craig Jennings, 03:45:40 PM



Wednesday, April 09, 2008

DAILY FISCAL POLICY REPORT -- April 9, 2008

Health Care -- Bipartisan Support for Blocking Bush Medicaid Rule: CQ reports ($) that a House bill that would block the president's Medicaid rule changes is gaining support among Republicans. The proposed rule changes would shift about $17.8 billion (over five years) in Medicaid costs to states. The bill, H.R. 5613, will be marked up today in the Committee on Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee.

War Spending -- Iraq Supplemental May Have Additional Stimulus Spending: After last week's deterioration of employment data released by the government, Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), along with Democratic House leaders, are calling for adding extension of unemployment benefits to the upcoming Iraq war spending bill. House Republicans have vowed to oppose additional stimulus spending. CongressDaily ($)

Inequality -- CBPP/EPI: Income Inequality Continues to Rise: The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the Economic Policy Institute have released a lengthy report analyzing state-by-state data on income trends. The report concludes that "The gap between the richest and poorest families...grew significantly in most states over the past two decades...In fact, the nation's longstanding trend of growing inequality accelerated since the late 1990s as incomes fell for poor families in a number of states." CBPP/EPI Report Executive Summary

Taxes -- "Extenders" Package Could Move Before End of May: Sen. Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) hopes to introduce, mark up and bring the extenders package of tax cuts to the Senate floor before the start of the Memorial Day Recess in May. The legislation would be fully offset, cover two years (2008 and 2009), and cost about $50 billion. Baucus would not pin down a date for introducing the measure, but stressed the need to get work done early: "We've got to do as much as we can during this work period." BNA ($)



Posted by Adam Hughes, 09:27:00 AM



Monday, April 07, 2008

Wash Post Opines on Future of Entitlements

The Washington Post wrote their lead editorial yesterday on the future of entitlement programs. The editorial once again lumps Social Security, a relatively healthy program, with Medicare and Medicaid, which face more serious funding issues not because they are entitlement programs, but because of the rapidly growing cost of health care in both the public and private sectors.

We have written a good deal on why Social Security should be kept separate from Medicare and Medicaid when discussing long-term fiscal issues and that the Social Security situation is actually not that bad and certainly not even close to a "crisis." (See here, here and here. Also, see our coverage of Congressional Budget Office Director Peter Orszag making the same point to Congress ).

Yet the Washington Post still does not understand the differences between two different causes they cite in the editorial (retirement of baby boomers, rising health care costs) and effects those causes will have. The main problem that must be addressed has always been and continues to be health care costs, not the retirement of the baby boomers. In fact, just last week, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities released an excellent report that showed the repeal of the Bush tax cuts for just the top one percent of Americans would generate enough revenue to close the entire funding shortage for Social Security.

While the main point of the editorial is well made (that politicians need to be forced to deal with these problems), the Post continues to follow other news outlets, policy makers, and even some budget experts in lumping the three programs together. This does not help move us toward a solution to the problems we face to keep the promises that have been made. We have to develop a clear understand of what we are up against before we attempt to fix it.



Posted by Adam Hughes, 12:04:59 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Bush Signs War Supplemental

BudgetBlog on Hiatus for Holiday: Happy Fourth Everyone!

The Heat Must Be Getting to Them

GAO Report Finds Private Medicare Providers Prefer Profits Over Providing Better Service

Yet Another Example of Questionable Outsourcing

Senate GOP Battling Themselves Over Earmarks

More Support for Ending the Contracting Free-For-All

House Approves Fiscally-Responsible AMT Patch

Contracting Oversight Commission Members Announced

OMB Refuses to Prioritize Army Contractor Oversight

Archived Entries for Entitlements

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

August, 2006

June, 2006

February, 2006

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

August, 2003