Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Friday, May 30, 2008

Controversial Medicaid Rule Nixed by Court

A federal court has sent back (vacated and remanded, in regulatory-speak) to the Bush administration a rule aimed to limit government reimbursement for Medicaid providers. The rule is one of several the administration is attempting to codify in an effort to undermine the entire Medicaid program.

The process by which the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services finalized the rule was particularly sneaky, even by Bush administration standards. A New York Times editorial explains:

In a decision issued last week, Judge James Robertson of the Federal District Court in Washington ruled that the administration had overstepped its authority last year with a maneuver "deliberately designed to outfox a clear directive of Congress." The administration was seeking to evade the annoying fact that Congress had enacted a one-year moratorium on the administration's efforts to alter — and in the process cut — Medicaid reimbursements to public hospitals and nursing homes.



Congress had already passed, but President Bush had not yet signed, a broad funding bill that included the moratorium when the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services rushed through a typo-ridden rule for "emergency display" on May 25, 2007, the very day the moratorium took legal effect. The rule, which had been in preparation for some time, was officially published a few days later. That shifty maneuver was too much for Judge Robertson to swallow. He found ample reason to overturn the rushed-through rule as a violation of Congressional intent.

The ruling should serve as a reminder to Bush administration higher-ups that Congress, not the Executive Branch, is primarily responsible for crafting federal policy. The role of federal agencies is to faithfully enforce the law in the spirit Congress intended, not to undermine it based on personal views — in this case, an ideological aversion to government programs meant to help the needy.

In his opinion, Judge Robertson writes to that effect:

[T]he Secretary treated an act of Congress seeking to control the substantive rules of Medicaid reimbursement as an "emergency," and prioritized issuance of his own rule over Congress's plain intent to prohibit his actions ... Although administrative law has evolved to allow agencies significant leeway to fill in the interstices of broad congressional mandates … control over the substance of the rules that govern the nation has always remained with Congress first. The Executive must comply with the duly enacted commands of Congress.



Posted by Matt Madia, 11:16:36 AM



Friday, May 23, 2008

Senate Votes to Stop Medicaid Changes

Yesterday, the Senate passed an amendment to the war supplemental bill that will put the brakes on several controversial Medicaid regulations. The Bush administration has finalized, or is preparing to finalize, the regulations in an effort to cut federal funding for a variety of Medicaid programs administered by the states. (More details on the regulations here.)

The administration developed the regulations under the guise of "fiscal integrity," arguing state Medicaid programs are using loopholes to inappropriately claim federal funds. Bush has threatened to veto the bill. Fortunately, the amendment passed the Senate in a 75-22 vote and also cleared the House by a veto-proof margin.

On May 6, more than 100 hospitals, providers, school districts and public interest groups (including OMB Watch) wrote to Congress in support of the legislation, which will place moratoria on all seven of the regulations until April 1, 2009. The letter says, "Taken together, the impact of these regulations would undermine the viability of our nation's health care safety net and reduce or eliminate access to health care services for many millions of low income patients."

Critics also question the administration's authority to make such major changes to Medicaid. For example, one of the proposed rules would limit the ability of state governments to provide rehabilitation services (such as transitions to independent housing) for people with mental illnesses or developmental disabilities. The Bush administration floated this limitation as a legislative proposal in 2006, but Congress rejected it.

Kudos to members in both chambers voting yea: they stood up to the administration's efforts to hobble state Medicaid programs.

From a government operations standpoint, Congress should also be commended for reestablishing control over issues that are properly within its purview and rebuking the administration's efforts to reinterpret federal law through administrative means.

Posted by Matt Madia, 12:00:40 PM



Thursday, May 22, 2008

War Supplemental Update: Senate Approves Spending Amendments
...lobbing it back over to the House

The Senate has approved an amendment to the war supplemental spending bill (HR 2642) that would fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through the end of Bush's presidency. The $165 billion spending measure was adopted 70-26.

And by a vote of 75-22, the Senate also adopted an amendment that would appropriate a bevy of domestic spending provisions including a $52 billion expansion of the GI bill, an $11 billion extension of unemployment insurance benefits, and $10 billion for Gulf Coast reconstruction. The amendment would also delay the implementation of a set of Medicaid rules designed to reduce federal spending on the health care program.

The bill now heads over to the House, which failed to add war funding to the measure when it voted on the bill last week. The House did, however, add a war policy amendment, which the Senate stripped from the bill. The House also added its own set of domestic spending, with some differences, the most significant of which is the House's $54 billion offset to the GI bill expansion.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 04:03:54 PM



House, Senate Set to Approve Budget Resolution

The House and Senate are set to vote on the FY 2009 Congressional Budget Resolution today. OMB Watch sent letters of support for the resolution to both the House and Senate Budget Committees yesterday (House letter, Senate letter). The letters highlight the positive (and negative) aspects of the resolution, as well as the recent historical difficulty of enacting a budget resolution during an election year (hasn't happened since 2000).

The resolution is good, but not great. Hopefully its enactment will help develop momentum for Congress to continue to draft and pass more fiscally-responsible, responsive fiscal policies in 2008 and beyond.

Related Materials:
Text of Conference Agreement
Statement of Conference Managers
Conrad/Spratt Joint Press Release
SBC: Budget Resolution Conference Agreement Overview
HBC: Highlights of the FY2009 Budget Resolution



Posted by Adam Hughes, 09:02:59 AM



Wednesday, May 21, 2008

GAO: The Nation's Long-Term Fiscal Outlook, April 2008 Update

The Government Accountability Office released an updated report on the nation's long-term fiscal outlook last week.

The outlook is still bleak, but the GAO is getting on the same page as the CBO in pointing toward rapidly rising health care costs as the prime cause of the gargantuan fiscal gap.

Although Social Security is a major part of the fiscal challenge, it is far from the biggest challenge. Spending on the major federal health programs (i.e., Medicare and Medicaid) represents a much larger, faster growing, and more immediate problem. In fact, the federal government's future obligations for Medicare Part D alone exceed the unfunded obligations for Social Security.


(click to enlarge)



Posted by Craig Jennings, 11:39:40 AM



Friday, May 16, 2008

GI Bill Surtax Would Affect 0.3% of All Taxpayers

When the House approved the domestic spending amendment to the war supplemental spending bill, it approved not only a $52 billion expansion of the GI Bill, but a 0.5% surtax on income for millionaire couples (individuals earning more than $500,000).

According a recent Citizens for Tax Justice report, the tax would affect about 0.3% of all taxpayers.

"The surtax would simply scale back the Bush tax cuts for the richest 0.3 percent of taxpayers, by an average of just 7 percent, to help the men and women returning from the wars and their families," said Robert S. McIntyre, director of Citizens for Tax Justice. "Lawmakers who oppose this proposal will prove that they really do value tax cuts for the wealthy over all else."
Annual effects of a proposed 0.47% surtax on adjusted gross income in excess of $1 million for married couples and $500,000 for others (at 2007 levels)
Number affected by surtax% of all taxpayers affectedTotal tax change
($-billion)
Average tax change
Married couples 291,300 0.5% $+3.0 $+10,240
Others 152,500 0.2% +0.9 +5,960
ALL 443,800 0.3% +3.9 +8,770
Source: Citizens for Tax Justice, "Surtax on Millionaires to Help Veterans Would Be A Tiny Sacrifice for the Richest 0.3 Percent of Taxpayers"
(click here to see full report chart)


Posted by Craig Jennings, 10:37:13 AM



Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Entitlement Panel Legislation Unlikely This Year

CQ reports ($) that Senate Budget Committee Chair Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) has cast serious doubt on the probability that legislation to create a commission to look at Social Security and Medicare reform will make any progress this year. Conrad had hoped to have a committee markup for the Bipartisan Task Force for Responsible Fiscal Action Act of 2007 (S. S 2063), but has been convinced there is scant appetite in Congress for any such measures.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 10:19:25 AM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Bush Signs War Supplemental

BudgetBlog on Hiatus for Holiday: Happy Fourth Everyone!

The Heat Must Be Getting to Them

GAO Report Finds Private Medicare Providers Prefer Profits Over Providing Better Service

Yet Another Example of Questionable Outsourcing

Senate GOP Battling Themselves Over Earmarks

More Support for Ending the Contracting Free-For-All

House Approves Fiscally-Responsible AMT Patch

Contracting Oversight Commission Members Announced

OMB Refuses to Prioritize Army Contractor Oversight

Archived Entries for Entitlements

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

August, 2006

June, 2006

February, 2006

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

August, 2003