HOME
ABOUT US
OUR ISSUES
Federal Budget
Appropriations / Spending
Budget Process
Federal Tax Policy
Estate Tax
Government Performance
Income/Wealth Inequality
Long Range Initiative
Archives
Charts
Economic Indicators
Information & Access
Nonprofit Advocacy
Regulatory Policy
PRESS ROOM
ACTION CENTER
PUBLICATIONS
THE WATCHER
OUR BLOGS
SIGN UP
Receive news, updates, and alerts!
DONATE
Help support our work
OTHER SITES
FedSpending.org
RTK NET
NPAction
Working Group on Community Right-to-Know
Citizens for Sensible Safeguards
Open the Government
Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
Yesterday, IRS Commissioner Mark Everson announced that the Questionable Refund Program, which is currently under scrutiny for recent practices, will undergo a review and modification process. Everson said in a news release, "We will announce plans in the very near future to institute notification procedures as well as significant processing improvements to minimize the number of taxpayers whose refunds are frozen unnecessarily." The agency will also likely revise its fraud screening procedures in order to withold fewer refunds owed to innocent taxpayers.The announcement came after a number of lawmakers wrote to the IRS questioning the program's focus on earned income tax credit beneficiaries.
Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olson commended Everson's pledge to make improvements in the program, and noted the following immediate priorities:
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
The Internal Revenue Service's taxpayer advocate, Nina Olson, told Congress in the annual report released today that tax refunds sought by hundreds of thousands of poor Americans were denied by the IRS and blocked for years to come. This was done because a computer program run by the criminal investigation division of the IRS selected the returns as part of the questionable refund program. Olson, whose staff looked at a sample of suspected returns, found only one in five to be questionable. Even worse, many of the taxpayers -- whose incomes averaged $13,000 annually -- were not ever told they were suspected of fraud.
Many of the filers were seeking the earned income tax credit (EITC), which is a benefit for the working poor. The average refund sought was $3,500 (compare this amount with the average $103,000 each taxpayer with an income above $1 million received last year thanks to the president's tax cuts). Olson found that of the taxpayers who pressed for their refunds, 66 percent were due all the money they sought, or even more than they had asked for. Perhaps most strikingly, Olson reported to Congress that the IRS is devoting many more resources towards looking into the questionable refunds pursued by the poor -- a $9 billion problem at most -- and far fewer resources towards the $100 billion problem of unreported incomes from many small businesses who deal only in cash.
New York Times: I.R.S. Limited Tax Refunds of Poor, Congress Is Told (1.10.2006)
Washington Post: IRS Froze Refunds, Study Says (1.11.2006)
Latest Entries by Theme
All Themes
Appropriations & Spending
Budget Projections
State Fiscal Policy
Watcher
Entitlements
Debt & Deficit
Oversight & Enforcement
Transparency
Privatization
Contact Us
Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax
Approps Update: Senate Back to Work
OMB Releases FY 2008 Earmarks Data
DPC Hearing on Iraq Contracting This Week
Monthly Budget Review: June, 2008
Congress to End White House Forest Conservation Program
Fiscal Policy Agenda Returns to Washington
Bush Signs War Supplemental
BudgetBlog on Hiatus for Holiday: Happy Fourth Everyone!
The Heat Must Be Getting to Them
GAO Report Finds Private Medicare Providers Prefer Profits Over Providing Better Service
Archived Entries for Oversight & Enforcement
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
December, 2006
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006