Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Friday, April 27, 2007

House to Investigate Security Breaches at USDA

In response to the disclosure of personal information and other security problems at the United States Department of Agriculture recently, the House Agriculture Committee is holding a hearing next week to review the USDA's release of program beneficiaries' Social Security numbers and other problems with the agencies information systems. The hearing will be on Wednesday, May 3, at 1:00 pm in the Longworth House Office Building, room 1300.

The hearing was requested by Rep. Zack Space (D-OH) after the NY Times broke the story of the security breach at USDA last Saturday. Although this data has been published to the public by USDA and the U.S. Census Bureau for years if not decades, the problem was not discovered until a farmer in IL found her personal information on the FedSpending.org web site two weeks ago.

Stay tuned here at the BudgetBlog next week for updates and highlights about the hearing.

Posted by Adam Hughes, 02:54:21 PM



Friday, April 20, 2007

OMB Watch Statement on Privacy Violation in Government Data

Earlier this afternoon, the New York Times published information about Social Security numbers being disclosed for many years by the government in unique identifiers for certain financial transactions (Read the NYTs story). This was discovered by a user of our FedSpending.org, an online service providing information about government spending that includes a government database that had the personally identifiable information.

We think the government's actions are inexcusable. It is impossible to fix the problem that affects thousands of people. But the government should take immediate action to provide an updated unique identifier that does not contain personally identifiable information.

We have agreed to redact the unique identifier on FedSpending.org if the federal government agrees to provide a plan within 30 days for correcting the problem. The unique identifier is an essential field for those interested in tracking individual financial transactions within government.

You can learn more about this breaking issue on FedSpending.org or on our homepage.

Posted by Adam Hughes, 03:30:23 PM



Thursday, April 19, 2007

Breaking - Doolittle Steps Down from Approps Committee

Rep. John Doolittle (R-CA), whose home was recently raided as part of an FBI investigation to his ties to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff, has resigned his seat on the House Appropriations Committee.

AP:

Rep. John Doolittle, whose house was searched by the FBI in an influence-peddling investigation, said Thursday he will step down temporarily from the House Appropriations Committee.

The announcement by the nine-term California Republican came one day after the disclosure that agents had raided his home in Oakton, Va. In the search last Friday, the FBI had a warrant for information connected with a fundraising business run by Doolittle's wife, Julie, that had done work for convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

"I understand how the most recent circumstances may lead some to question my tenure on the Appropriations Committee," Doolittle wrote House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 05:16:40 PM



Requiem for Departing IRS Commissioner Mark Everson

While at his new job with the Red Cross, may he find redemption for the following:

Oh, and for not really doing much to close the tax gap, though Congress never gave him a big enough budget to do anything significant.



Posted by Matt Lewis, 03:57:12 PM



Tax Gap Fever

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson thinks we have no choice but to let people evade taxes, apparently. Having just paid my taxes, I find that a little annoying.

In testimony before Congress yesterday, Paulson made a case for restraint in closing the the tax gap, which is a sanitized way of putting the annual total of tax evasion, avoidance and errors (noncompliance, in tax speak). IRS estimates the tax gap to be at $353 billion a year, or about 16 percent of total taxes owed.

So why can't we go after this money? Here's Paulson:

"There is a big part of the tax gap that we simply won't be able to reach without adding draconian and painful requirements on all taxpayers," Paulson said.

All taxpayers? But not all taxpayers are noncompliant. Indeed, the IRS collects 99 percent of the taxes on income earned from wages and salaries. It's business income, and income from capital gains and dividends, that the IRS has trouble getting a hold of (See this EPI report for more).

So no, reducing noncompliance would not add any type of requirement for most taxpayers. Businesses and wealthy people would be most affected. That's who doesn't pay up.

But Paulson is right that this issue does affect all taxpayers- it's everyone that loses out when people don't pay their taxes. It's compliant taxpayers that in the long run have to pay more taxes to make up for what noncompliant taxpayers don't pay. It's everyone that could use more funding for education, or infrastructural investment, or solving our health care crisis. And it's everyone that has to pay for unnecessary deficit spending and debt.

Those "Draconian and painful" consequences that Paulson mentions are real, and they're already present. They're the consequences of not doing anything about the tax gap.



Posted by Matt Lewis, 10:28:32 AM



Monday, April 16, 2007

Important Tax Day Readings

Check out this NYT article to find out how much people like you are being audited compared to other people.

And see the latest release by Syracuse University's TRAC, which had to sue the IRS to get data that shows that it has been strangely unproductive when it audits large corporations.



Posted by Matt Lewis, 11:25:46 AM



Thursday, April 05, 2007

GSA Chief Being Investigated

Via Think Progress, looks like the Office of Special Counsel has launched an investigation into GSA chief Lurita Doan's possible Hatch Act violations.



Posted by Matt Lewis, 05:05:14 PM



Double Standard in Evaluating Government at OMB

There was an interesting article in Government Executive magazine yesterday about measuring cost savings of federal jobs that are opened to public-private competitions. The specifics of the policies being developed by OMB and others within the federal government are quite complex, but one particular passage from the article references a statement from Office of Management and Budget Associate Administrator Mathew Blum that was moderately infuriating and still has me scratching my head:

"We recognize that this is not going to be a precise science," Blum said. "We do ourselves a disservice if we spend too much time arguing about the precise formula for savings." He said that cost and performance validation are important but costly, and OMB will be looking for data on a sampling of competitions, rather than on each one.

A sampling of competitions? So when OMB wants to evaluate regular government programs, it wastes excessive amounts of time, money, and energy making agency staff from every single government program wade through the ridiculous exercise of being surveyed under the Program Assessment Rating Tool (review a rundown of PART's flaws), but when there are private companies involved with doing public work for the government, we just need to use a handful of examples to evaluate whether Joe and Jane Taxpayer are getting the best value for the money. It's unclear to me why this isn't a pretty nasty double standard.



Posted by Adam Hughes, 03:09:50 PM



Sunday, April 01, 2007

Not Oversight Is Oversight Through Oversight

In weird sort of Zen meditation on the nature of oversight, the Department of Education overlooks a stark conflict of interest by selecting the company which implemented a billion-dollar reading program to evaluate the very program that it implemented. And the company in question has been criticized by the Ed. Dept.'s inspector general for failing to avoid conflict of interest problems when it originally implemented the program.

Reading First, part of President Bush's signature No Child Left Behind education law, provides intense reading help to low-income children in the early elementary grades. RMC Research Corp. was hired to establish and implement the program starting in 2002, under three contracts worth about $40 million.

Recently, the Education Department's inspector general reported that RMC failed to keep the program free of conflicts of interest. For example, RMC did not screen subcontractors for relationships with publishers of reading programs.

Now, Reading First is in the midst of a congressionally mandated evaluation under a 2003 contract with a team that includes RMC, based in Portsmouth, N.H.

(h/t ThinkProgress)



Posted by Craig Jennings, 04:56:07 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Bush Signs War Supplemental

BudgetBlog on Hiatus for Holiday: Happy Fourth Everyone!

The Heat Must Be Getting to Them

GAO Report Finds Private Medicare Providers Prefer Profits Over Providing Better Service

Yet Another Example of Questionable Outsourcing

Senate GOP Battling Themselves Over Earmarks

More Support for Ending the Contracting Free-For-All

House Approves Fiscally-Responsible AMT Patch

Contracting Oversight Commission Members Announced

OMB Refuses to Prioritize Army Contractor Oversight

Archived Entries for Oversight & Enforcement

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006