Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Friday, September 28, 2007

OMB-OMB Watch Collaboration Improving Results?

Got a email from the nice folks over at OMB this morning about my blog post last week on the release of new PART scores and some of the shortcomings of the PART website. The email was surprising for two reasons: first, they read the BudgetBlog. (ok, so that's not so surprising as we all know everybody who is anybody reads the BudgetBlog.) Second, and perhaps more surprising, they have changed the spreadsheet that lists all PART scores that you can download from ExpectMore.gov to include a column for "Last Year Assessed." Now anyone can easily tell when the last assessment was done for each program. Fantastic! Way to go OMB! (I feel slightly more influential today than I did yesterday, which really wasn't very influential at all.)

OMB also reported they are working to improve the search engine on the site so the most recent review links are returned when searching for programs. This is also excellent news, with one caveat: I'd still like to have access to the links to the older reviews available when I search, just not as the first items that are returned from the search engine. Instead of removing those links entirely from the search results (or from the site altogether), it would be better to list the reviews chronologically. Then users can tell when each assessment happened and allows them to compare between assessments to see what has changed. When I searched for our old friend - the Administration on Aging (AoA) - this afternoon, the search returned links to the 2007 review pages, but do not list those conducted in 2003. The links for the 2003 reviews no longer work.

Since I suspect that OMB may read this and was very responsive in taking a previous suggestion of mine, perhaps I'll try it again. Here's what I'd like to see (click the image to enlarge):

    1) Expand the posting of "Last Year Assessed" data to the summary view for each program, in addition to listing it in the assessment details page and raw data in spreadsheets.

    2) Links to older assessments from previous years (where applicable) on the most recent summary view for each program. So for the AoA, you would be able to click on a link in the 2007 review that took you to all past reviews.

So a big thank you to OMB for incorporating some user suggestions to their website, and here's hoping we can keep improving it. If this works, I'm asking for the out-year discretionary spending details from the President's budget - those always seem to get leaked eventually, but it would be nice to have them upfront. Who knows how far this might go...





Posted by Adam Hughes, 05:15:01 PM



Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Authorization Earmark an Oxymoron?

Though President Bush signed the ethics and lobbying bill several weeks ago, some conservative critics now contend that the bill is conspicuously lacking, since it applies only to earmarks in appropriations -- and not authorization -- bills.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) says he reads the new earmark rules — and that the Senate Parliamentarian will back up his reading of the rules — to not ban Members from including new earmarks into authorization bills during conference talks with the House.

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC), replies that he had intended the bill to cover both appropriations and authorization bills. But in a Sept. 24 letter to DeMint, Reid informed DeMint that because of a second provision — also written by DeMint that was added to the bill, which does not explicitly include authorization bills in the ban — the provisions only will apply to appropriations measures.

When earmark abuse occurs, it involves the unjustified use of taxpayer money — not the setting of authorization levels. It is appropriate to require full disclosure of all items that involve specific member-requested projects, including authorizations, but only those items that actually spend taxpayer money should be subject to the extraordinary procedure of allowing a point of order to strike a provision that is within the scope of conference from a conference report.

Is an authorization earmark an oxymoron?



Posted by Dana Chasin, 01:02:50 PM



Tuesday, September 25, 2007

A Correction and an Explanation

We were contacted over the weekend by the Administration on Aging (AoA) in response to my posting last Thursday about the newly released round of PART scores. Saadia Greenberg, Director of the Office of Evaluation at the AoA correctly points out that I was in error when I said it was strange OMB cited the AoA during this release of new scores because it was evaluated by the PART in 2003. In fact, the AoA was reassessed this year (2007) and you can see the results of the reassessment. I apologize for the error. Now I certainly don't want to pass the buck here, but this mistake wasn't really my fault. If you put "Administration on Aging" into the search engine on the ExpectMore.gov website, all you get is information on the program's evaluation from 2003, not 2007. See the screen capture I took this morning:

This brings up two important points about the PART:


Keep Reading About the Two Points...

Posted by Adam Hughes, 10:22:34 AM



Monday, September 24, 2007

EarmarkWatch.org -- the Wiki for those who Wonder...

... just who's getting all those earmarks anyway? Who's giving them and why? Do earmarks meet pressing needs or pay off political favors? And which are pure pork?

Check out EarmarkWatch.org, a new tool that makes it easy to look under the rock and take a close look at earmarks, like the $100,000 prize that Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) secured for an organization that promotes creationism in Louisiana schools -- paid for in part by you, of course.

The site has just gone up and will no doubt expand in scope and functionality. But you can already find out which recipients of earmarks hired lobbyists, made campaign contributions to members of Congress, or won federal contracts and grants.

And it's a Wiki, meaning you can share your own research on earmarks with the site's other users. If you're new to the earmark world and wonder what it's all about, the site's FAQ section puts it all in context for you.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 05:42:19 PM



Thursday, September 20, 2007

White House Releases Next Round of PART Scores

The White House released the next round of PART scores yesterday (the 2007 PART scores), adding an additional 40 new programs that had never before been assessed to the docket and 75 programs that were reassessed at the request of agency staff. The full gambit of PART scores can be found at ExpectMore.gov, but it is difficult to identify the newly assessed programs or the ones that were reassessed.

There isn't much new to report with this latest release. OMB's releases (see here and here) show that overall, programs are getting better scores on the PART. The releases don't elaborate if this means the programs are actually getting better results, or if program staff are just getting better at taking the test.

OMB does cite two examples of improved programs, saying the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) program dismantled 149 more drug trafficking organizations for $4,000 less per organization, saving the taxpayers a whopping $596,000, and the Administration on Aging served 20,000 more elderly people between 2003 and 2005. While the savings to the HIDTA program are small, they are savings nonetheless, and I think we can all agree that serving more elderly folks in need is certainly a good thing. (Despite this, there was no information given concerning if the elderly received similar services or if the program received additional funds between those years. It's also strange that AoA was cited because it was assessed by the PART in 2003, not this past year. Check out the HIDTA and AoA PART assessments.)

While loyal BudgetBlog readers will know we have some pretty serious concerns with the PART, OMB does seem to be continually improving the transparency and access to information on the ExpectMore.gov website. They have added the option to browse programs by either type of program (block grant, credit, research and development, etc.) or by topic (education, transportation, law enforcement, etc.). They've also added an agency summary section for each agency that includes links to the agency's budget justification documents, strategic plans, and nice breakdowns of the ratings received for all programs in the department and how much money is spent on each type of rated program (i.e. $X million spent on moderately effective programs or ineffective programs).



Posted by Adam Hughes, 06:49:55 PM



Alan Spoke -- Atlas Shrugged
Because He Couldn't Hear Him

NEWS ITEM: Greenspan in 1987 said he had "learned to mumble with great incoherence." (USA Today)

I want to take this opportunity, on the occasion of a cycle of media coverage of the publication of a book by a certain former chairman of the Federal Reserve Board to express myself in no uncertain and certainly no less prolix terms than said chairman to say that certain sayings ascribed to the subject of this discursis were subject to such scrutiny as practically, if not irrationally, and often exhuberantly, to confer upon them the status of scripture.

Cultivating a cult of confusion to cover critical questions, especially where one is endowed with authority but without accountability, is indeed a time-honored strategy for suggesting that one is a suitable steward of the sanctified secrets of the priesthood, mindful that mobs, markets, and mere mortals must not meddle in such matters of great moment as monetary policy. Therefore, we mumble.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 05:56:11 PM



FedSpending.org Adds New Data, Features

FedSpending.org has launched a new version today, with updated data from parts of FY 2006 and FY 2007, new features and search functionality, greater accessibility for people with disabilities, and a few bug fixes in the site. The site now contains contracting data through the second quarter of FY 2007 and federal assistance data through the first three quarters of FY 2006.

In addition, users now have the ability to narrow contracting searches by using contractor characteristics, such as "minority owned business," or "8A firms," just to name a few. This function is called "Contractor Type" and can be found in all the advanced searches on the contracts side of the database.

Read the OMB Watch press release, or check out the site for more information on the new version.



Posted by Adam Hughes, 01:37:14 PM



Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Take the BudgetBlog Reader Survey

We here at the BudgetBlog would like to know what you think of our blog. Please take a moment to fill this short reader survey and give us your thoughts.



Posted by Craig Jennings, 12:40:45 PM



Monday, September 17, 2007

Lobbying and Ethics Bill Enacted

On Friday, President Bush finally signed the lobbying and ethics reform bill. OpenCongress has the story.



Posted by Matt Lewis, 01:13:44 PM



Thursday, September 13, 2007

Halfway Done, FY 2008 Congressional Earmarks Cut in Half

It's only a halftime score, but with all 12 of the House FY 2008 appropriations bills adopted, the total number and dollar value of the congressional earmarks included in these bills -- 6,651 earmarks worth $7.95 billion -- is down by about half from the 13,492 congressional earmarks totaling $18.94 billion in FY 2005.

These numbers reflect calculations based on data from the official OMB earmarks website. Caveat: the site contains a full accounting of earmarks only for FY 2005, and only for congressionally-requested earmarks (omitting all executive branch earmarks requests).

Early signals are less auspicious for the final score, as the Senate had only adopted three appropriations bills by the end of last week, with 4,700 earmarks passed thus far, equaling $12.14 billion. These figures do not include the Senate defense bill. The House defense bill -- $4 billion in earmarks -- accounted for half of the value of House earmarks.

But willy-nilly, certainly the overall number and possibly the dollar value of congressional earmarks will be down from FY 2005.



Posted by Dana Chasin, 02:21:41 PM



Monday, September 10, 2007

Hold-Up in the Senate: Transparency Mugged Again

The elimination under cover of darkness of that magnificent institution, the secret senatorial hold, is, apparently, a baleful "connivance" snuck into the lobbying and ethics bill, catching "rank-and-file" senators unawares and opening up the floodgates for "special interest measures," spoiling a "historic opportunity to expose secretive pork-barrel spending."

If you doubt me, maybe you will believe Robert Novak?



Posted by Dana Chasin, 12:34:44 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

House Approves, Bush Signs Bailout Bill

Timely CTJ Report Pushes for Reagan Tax Proposal

FedSpending.org Will Blow Your Mind

Senate Approves Bailout; Cost "Impossible" to Predict

Interesting Perspectives on the Bailout

Senate Attempts to Sweeten Bailout Bill

Under the Radar: Congress Finishes FY 2009 Approps

Next Move After House Fails to Pass Wall Street Bailout Uncertain

Updated Wall Street Bailout Plan Details

Bailout Agreement Reached

Archived Entries for Transparency

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006