Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Wednesday, January 25, 2006

Graham to be Feted by Industry Lobbyists
Well, the corporate special interests really did appreciate being placed above the public interest -- so much so, they wanted to put their money where their mouth is and host a reception for outgoing OIRA administrator John Graham. From the Washington Post:
Did you mark your calendars next week for a "farewell reception" Tuesday "honoring John Graham ," the administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the Office of Management and Budget?

That's the super-powerful office that oversees many business regulations. The lobbying firm Valis Associates, which lists manufacturing, telecommunications and energy groups among its 2005 clients, had booked the Committee on Small Business room in the Rayburn House Office Building for the event.

Graham has often been blasted for being pro-business, and some hypersensitive eyebrows arched yesterday about this gathering. But he is leaving his job March 1, and people throw farewell receptions all the time to thank oversight officials for jobs well done.

Even so, OMB spokesman Alex Conant , asked yesterday about the reception, said: "After it was first cleared by the ethics office, our understanding of the basic event changed and no longer fits within our ethical guidelines, so it was canceled." We're told the cancellation came around 5:30 p.m.

Why would corporate special interests be so enamored of the head of such an obscure office? Find out more in The Graham Files.


Posted by Robert Shull, 05:12:13 PM



Monday, January 23, 2006

Making Our Food Less Safe
The Detroit Free Press reports on a new industry-led effort to ban state and local governments from limiting genetically engineered products in their communities. In response to local initiatives in towns and counties in California and New England that ban raising genetically-engineered crops, state legislatures in18 states have put forward proposals "that would bar towns and counties from enacting local legislation to regulate genetically engineered seed." Initiatives have already passed in 14 of the 18 states.

Genetically-engineered foods pose a variety of known risks both to humans and to the security of the nation's food supply. Moreover, as a relatively new technological advancement, genetically-engineered products also pose many unknown risks as well. The legislation bars communities from enacting the precautionary principle, which would require new technologies be proven safe before being adopted.

Moreover, the situation exemplifies the problems facing state advocacy. Though states have often surpassed the federal government in achieving strong and responsive public protections, they have also presented an easy target for industry special interests whose legislative agendas may meet more resistance in the national arena. Just as state initiatives may present great opportunities for advancing social goods, they are also susceptible to the vast influence of corporate special interests.

More on the hazards of genetically-modified crops: Nanotech, Genetically Modified Crops Spotlights Regulatory Gaps (11/01/2005)

More on state progressive reform: States Present Opportunities and Pitfalls for Progressive Reform (8/22/2005)

Posted by Genevieve Smith, 11:26:07 AM



Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Reading about Risk
Click here for a deeply insightful report from Public Citizen on many of the policy issues now at stake in the White House's new Proposed Risk Assessment Bulletin. Published when John Graham was nominated to head OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, it tracks the relationship of corporate special interest money and a cottage industry of aggressively manipulating the discourse of risk to pursue anti-regulatory ends. It includes a very thoughtful engagement with the risk scholarship of Graham and his ilk.

Posted by Robert Shull, 02:06:44 PM



Wednesday, January 04, 2006

West Virginia Mine Tragedy: In the Days to Come
The Department of Labor's Mine Safety and Health Administration will investigate the causes and circumstances of the West Virginia coal mine tragedy. Members of Congress are also calling for oversight hearings, which may be all too necessary, if MSHA's history is any guide. In the early days of the Bush administration, when a mining industry executive was placed in charge of the agency that regulates the mining industry, MSHA cut short an investigation into a mine safety accident: a breach of an impoundment that sent hundreds of millions of gallons of toxic coal slurry into the environment in Kentucky and West Virginia. The affected communities are still reeling from the health effects and inadequate public health response.

As press interest faded in the Martin County case, revived only by the sexiness of a whistleblower story, the ongoing aftermath of that failure has gone under the radar. Maybe this time things will be different.

Posted by Robert Shull, 03:38:40 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Is the Bush Administration Meddling with Risk Assessments?

White House Blocks Effort to Clean Up Pesticide Containers

Senate Moves Bill to Renew Federal Improvement Panel

After Preemption Row, Roof Strength Rule Delayed

Consumers Left in the Dark on Food Safety

Regulatory Attacks on Medicaid Halted

OMB Shutting Out EPA on CO2 Regulation

Bush Regulatory Gatekeepers on House Chopping Block

Lobbyists Opposing FDA Changes

It All Depends on Who You Ask

Archived Entries for Industry Influence

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004