HOME
ABOUT US
OUR ISSUES
Federal Budget
Information & Access
Nonprofit Advocacy
Regulatory Policy
DudleyWatch
Unmet Needs
Paralysis by Analysis
White House Interventions
Special Interests v. Public Interest
National Solutions for National Needs
In Congress
In the Courts
Public Participation
The Bush Record
Reports & Analyses
RegWatch
Resource Center
PRESS ROOM
ACTION CENTER
PUBLICATIONS
THE WATCHER
OUR BLOGS
SIGN UP
Receive news, updates, and alerts!
DONATE
Help support our work
OTHER SITES
FedSpending.org
RTK NET
NPAction
Working Group on Community Right-to-Know
Citizens for Sensible Safeguards
Open the Government
"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR
News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room
Thursday, November 15, 2007
The European Commission and the White House Office of Management and Budget have released a joint draft report titled, "Review of the application of EU and US regulatory impact assessment guidelines on the analysis of impacts on international trade and investment."
The report describes the system by which the European Union (EU) and the U.S. examine proposed regulations for their potential impacts on foreign parties and/or international trade.
The report shows the EU's system for assessing the international impacts of regulation is more developed than that of the U.S. and recommends more thoughtful consideration of such impacts in future policy-making efforts.
In its discussion of the U.S. system for assessing international impact, the report almost exclusively examines Circular A-4, OMB's guidance for the preparation of cost-benefit analyses for proposed and final regulations. According to the report, "Circular A-4 does not offer clear guidance on how to consider the international trade and investment effects of US regulation." However, "In practice, US Regulatory Impact Analyses often acknowledge that many direct impacts on foreign entities are passed on to the U.S. economy."
The report also hints OMB may issue an executive directive on the subject or at least amend Circular A-4 to more explicitly include international impact assessment.
Reg•Watch has two initial concerns with requiring this type of assessment. First, the assessment would add an additional layer of study to a regulatory process already thick with analytical requirements. That could mean more delay in the issuance of regulations.
Second, couching an international impact assessment in terms of cost-benefit analysis may skew the quantified effects toward the cost side of the ledger, something OMB has been prone to do during the Bush administration. In an increasingly global society, assessing international impacts is useful; but the impacts are not solely economic. As we have seen with the seemingly endless stories of dangerous Chinese imports, a regulatory system can impact health, welfare and peace of mind.
Stay tuned to Reg•Watch for updates on this issue.
Latest Entries by Theme
All Themes
Enforcement
About This Blog
Rollbacks
Safety
Industry Influence
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Publications
Consumer Issues
Environment
Public Health
Oversight
In the White House
Most Recent Entries for RegWatch
Bush Strips Employee Rights with Last-Minute Order
White House Still Working to Thwart GHG Regulation
Endangered Species Rule Sealing Bush Legacy on Warming
Bush Administration Politicos Will Stick Around
Rules of the Road: DOT Puts Truck Drivers and Motorists at Risk
Last-Minute Rule Allows More Dirty Oil Production
Recommendations on Regulatory Reform for the Next President and Congress
Bush Handing over Wilderness to Oil and Gas Industry
New Rule Likely to Cut Health Care for the Poor
For High Court, High Stakes Case on Preemption
Archived Entries for Publications
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
August, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
December, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
December, 2005
November, 2005
October, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
December, 2004
November, 2004
October, 2004
September, 2004