HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Thursday, November 15, 2007

OMB and EU Discuss Regulation and International Trade

The European Commission and the White House Office of Management and Budget have released a joint draft report titled, "Review of the application of EU and US regulatory impact assessment guidelines on the analysis of impacts on international trade and investment."

The report describes the system by which the European Union (EU) and the U.S. examine proposed regulations for their potential impacts on foreign parties and/or international trade.

The report shows the EU's system for assessing the international impacts of regulation is more developed than that of the U.S. and recommends more thoughtful consideration of such impacts in future policy-making efforts.

In its discussion of the U.S. system for assessing international impact, the report almost exclusively examines Circular A-4, OMB's guidance for the preparation of cost-benefit analyses for proposed and final regulations. According to the report, "Circular A-4 does not offer clear guidance on how to consider the international trade and investment effects of US regulation." However, "In practice, US Regulatory Impact Analyses often acknowledge that many direct impacts on foreign entities are passed on to the U.S. economy."

The report also hints OMB may issue an executive directive on the subject or at least amend Circular A-4 to more explicitly include international impact assessment.

Reg•Watch has two initial concerns with requiring this type of assessment. First, the assessment would add an additional layer of study to a regulatory process already thick with analytical requirements. That could mean more delay in the issuance of regulations.

Second, couching an international impact assessment in terms of cost-benefit analysis may skew the quantified effects toward the cost side of the ledger, something OMB has been prone to do during the Bush administration. In an increasingly global society, assessing international impacts is useful; but the impacts are not solely economic. As we have seen with the seemingly endless stories of dangerous Chinese imports, a regulatory system can impact health, welfare and peace of mind.

Stay tuned to Reg•Watch for updates on this issue.



Posted by Matt Madia, 04:21:58 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Bush Strips Employee Rights with Last-Minute Order

White House Still Working to Thwart GHG Regulation

Endangered Species Rule Sealing Bush Legacy on Warming

Bush Administration Politicos Will Stick Around

Rules of the Road: DOT Puts Truck Drivers and Motorists at Risk

Last-Minute Rule Allows More Dirty Oil Production

Recommendations on Regulatory Reform for the Next President and Congress

Bush Handing over Wilderness to Oil and Gas Industry

New Rule Likely to Cut Health Care for the Poor

For High Court, High Stakes Case on Preemption

Archived Entries for Publications

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

August, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

December, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004