Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Tuesday, September 20, 2005

Senate to Vote on Grain Inspection Privatization
The Senate Agriculture Committee is set to vote today on the privatization of grain inspections. The provision is part of the reauthorization of the U. S. Grain Standards Act (S. 1582), which originally established a standardized and uniform grain inspection system for both domestic and exported U.S. grains. According to BNA's Daily Report for Executives (subscription only), industry is divided on support of the measure, which may save the grain industry money but could also damage the credibility of U.S. grain inspections.

Inspection is a vital part of the enforcement of government regulations and standards. It is also an inherently governmental function necessary both to hold private industry accountable as well as to maintain the public trust's of the private the sector. It remains to be seen whether this bill is an anomaly or part of a larger trend in the privation of government.

Posted by Genevieve Smith, 03:07:55 PM



Monday, September 12, 2005

Data Quality, Uncertainty, Precaution
The latest issue of Rachel's Environment & Health News reviews the Data Quality Act and concludes with this sharp observation:
In other words, corporations have now succeeded in getting themselves "regulated" by a set of laws and rules that effectively paralyze government regulators. Regulation of chemicals has effectively ended. The regulatory system now regulates not industry but environmentalists, in the sense that it narrowly defines and restricts the responses that they can make to corporate harms. By channeling environmentalist responses into industry-defined activities, the regulatory system makes environmentalists entirely predictable and therefore manageable.

But all is not lost. Industry's strategy for ending government regulation has an Achilles' heel. The whole strategy rests on the assumption that, when the science is uncertain, we should proceed with "business as usual" until harm can be proven to a scientific certainty. The precautionary principle turns this assumption on its head, saying, "When the science is uncertain, but there is evidence of harm, we have a duty to take precautionary action to prevent harm." If the precautionary principle were adopted, industry's elaborate strategy for paralyzing government would crumble.

Could this be why the chemical industry and the Bush administration have mounted a coordinated campaign to discredit, demonize, and derail the precautionary principle? You think?

Writing the precautionary principle into local laws -- and perhaps more importantly into corporate charters -- would fundamentally change the balance of power between people and money. What a worthy fight this is!

The coda to the article also announces a new Rachel's newsletter focusing on the precautionary principle.


Posted by Robert Shull, 04:21:50 PM



Friday, September 09, 2005

States, Consumer Groups Sue over Energy Savings Standards
The Department of Energy has failed to revise energy savings standards for home appliances, prompting 15 states and New York City to file suit. In the 1990s, Congress instructed DOE to develop performance criteria for household appliances and to periodically update those standards. However, deadlines for updating the energy savings standards of 22 different home appliances expired six to 13 years ago, costing consumers billions of dollars, according to Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, a plaintiff in the suit. The Natural Resource Defense Council, Massachusetts Union of Public Housing Tenants, and the Texas Ratepayers' Organization to Save Energy also filed suit over the expired deadlines.

Posted by Genevieve Smith, 11:28:58 AM



Thursday, September 08, 2005

Americans Demand Focus on Domestic Policy
USA Today is reporting the results of the latest Pew poll, in which a majority expresses its desire for a renewed focus on domestic policy:
More than half of Americans now say it is more important for the president to focus on domestic policy — the first time since Sept. 11, 2001 that domestic matters have been viewed as a higher priority than the war on terrorism in polling by the Pew Research Center.

Two-thirds said the president could have done more to get relief efforts going quickly, according to the survey.

The slow-moving response to the hurricane appears to have shaken American confidence in the government's ability to deal with a major disaster. Four in 10 said the response to the hurricane has made them less confident about the government's ability to handle a major terrorist attack.

Almost six in 10 in the Pew poll, 58%, say they have felt depressed because of what's happened along the Gulf Coast. Pew polling indicates that at no point during the Iraq war has that high a percentage of people said they were depressed because of the war.

The findings should not be all that surprising: majorities consistently report that they believe the government has an important role in protecting public health and safety. Meanwhile, those same majorities have been witnessing, with horror, the results of government's failure to fulfill that role.


Posted by Robert Shull, 05:31:59 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

New Website Highlights Old Office of Technology Assessment

For Mysterious Occupational Risk Rule, Shenanigans Abound

Find out How Much You're Worth. Take our Trip around the Beltway.

On Consumer Product Bill, More Work Remains

Will Congress Wrap Up Consumer Safety Bill?

Bush Administration Says Americans Are Worth Less

Lawmakers Probe on Occupational Risk Rulemaking

Bush Administration Will Ignore Its Own Notice on CO2 Emissions

On Food Tracking, FDA Says "Not Our Responsibility"

America's Wetlands Sullied by Supreme Court Decision

Archived Entries for Consumer Issues

July

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004