Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Dudley Evades Democrats' Probes in Hearing

Monday's hearing on the nomination of Susan Dudley to be the new director of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in OMB did little to reveal Dudley's positions on a variety of issues. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), the current chair of the Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs, was the only Republican member of the committee to attend the hearing. The incoming chair, Sen. Joseph Lieberman (ID-CT), did not attend the hearing but submitted an extensive list of questions to Dudley prior to the hearing.

The Democrats on the committee asked Dudley questions concerning her views on regulation of arsenic, ozone, the Toxics Release Inventory, and her writings on the economic benefits of regulations generally. Dudley has written extensively on the benefits of market forces to regulate public interest protections rather than having governments issue protective standards. The Democrats asked probing questions about her writings, the substance of different regulations, and her ideas about managing OIRA if confirmed.

Even when pushed on issues by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Mark Pryor (D-AR), and Tom Carper (D-DE), Dudley evaded the questions with answers suggesting that the Senators were reading her writings too broadly or saying she would be willing to talk about these issues once confirmed. She retreated from only one position when Collins asked Dudley if she really believed that states, such as Maine, which is downwind of Midwestern power stations' pollution, should be in the position of compensating polluters. Dudley admitted that she "was wrong" and suggested those writings were an example of someone engaged in scholarly writings instead of a practical regulatory role.

After the hearing Collins told the press she was leaning toward supporting the nominee and expected to bring it to a committee vote during the December lame duck session.

No other members on the committee have taken positions. However, given the probing questions by the Democrats and evasive responses from Dudley it would appear that the concern over her nomination will not likely dissipate.

A CQ Today article may have summed it up best when the reporter noted that Sen. John Warner (R-VA) introduced Dudley and then immediately left saying, "I wish you luck, and you’re on your own."



Posted by Rick Melberth, 01:52:49 PM



Tuesday, November 14, 2006

More Oversight in the Next Congress?
The new Cindy Skrzycki column bodes well for federal oversight in the next Congress:
Some of the new masters of oversight are eager to get to work. [Pending Transportation and Infrastructure Chair Rep. James] Oberstar's agenda includes tightening port security and improving the operations of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, much maligned for its Hurricane Katrina performance.

Rep. John D. Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, is set to return as chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over consumer protection, telecommunications, air quality, energy, and food and drug safety.

Dingell has a reputation for relentless investigation, and his "Dingellgrams" -- requests for exhaustive paperwork from federal agencies and witnesses -- are remembered and feared in Washington.

Other Congressmen with oversight agendas include Rep. George Miller, who will oversee occupational health and safety on the Education and Workforce Committee, and Sen. Edward Kennedy, who will do the same on the Senate side.

Posted by Genevieve Smith, 10:46:48 PM



Boxer Threatens to Put Hold on EPA IG Nominee
Susan Dudley isn't the only controversial nominee that might be snuck through during the lame duck session. According to CongressDaily, future chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), is threatening to put a hold on the nomination for the Environmental Protection Agency's nominee for Inspector General. The IG is responsible for sussing out waste, fraud and abuse in the agency.

Unfortunately, Bush's pick, Alex Beehler, has more experience in industry than oversight. As the Defense Department's assistant deputy undersecretary for environment, safety and occupational health, Beehler sought to exempt the military from environmental regulation. Beehler also worked for Koch Industries, distributing money to anti-regulatory groups, including Susan Dudley's own Mercatus Center.

All ten Republicans on the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee have said they will support the nomination, guaranteeing the nomination would pass a committee vote. Boxer has threatened to put a hold on the nomination if it passes committee.

Former EPA IG Nikki Tinsley resigned in January. Tinsley's tenacious investigations often put her at odds with the White House. Her reports on EPA's failure to regulate smog and mercury emissions were particularly damning. Check out this WaPo article for more on Tinsley.

Read Beehler's testimony from his September hearing.

Posted by Genevieve Smith, 10:22:41 PM



Thursday, November 09, 2006

Latest Watcher
Be sure to check out the latest issue of our biweekly newsletter, The Watcher. Reg policy articles this time:

EPA Falters on Commitment to Environmental Justice

Less than two months after the Inspector General for the Environmental Protection Agency issued a report critical of the agency's commitment to environmental justice, EPA closes the doors of one of its regional offices for minority advocacy.



Posted by Genevieve Smith, 11:53:24 PM



Tuesday, November 07, 2006

Industry Opposes EPA's Smog Reduction Proposal

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported this past weekend that industry is stridently opposing an EPA recommendation to reduce ozone, often referred to as smog. EPA released the recommendation in a staff paper last July. For a summary, click here.

The staff paper recommends tightening ozone emissions by lowering the allowable limit to 0.07 parts per million (ppm). The current limit is 0.08 ppm, set in 1997.

After EPA submitted the staff paper for public comment, the usual players began blowing the anti-regulatory trumpet. The list of industry organizations opposing the recommendation in comments to EPA reads like a who’s who of environmental thugs: ExxonMobil; the American Petroleum Institute; and the Edison Electric Institute, among others. All the groups similarly attack EPA’s science, but the smear campaign does little to mask their pro-industry agenda.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) provides one of the few voices of reason in the commentary. Dr. Eileen M. Ouellette, president of the AAP, calls for even tighter restrictions bluntly stating, "The range under consideration for the ozone standard does not protect the health of infants and children."

Environmental and public interest groups, including Clean Air Watch and the American Lung Association, are amplifying the call for tighter regulation. The groups site a recommendation by the EPA's own Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee which called in October for a standard of 0.06-0.07 ppm.

With support from environmental groups, public health groups, and two of its own reports, it is clear EPA should lower the allowable limit for smog. The tighter regulation will protect public health as well as send a message that industry cannot bully the agency.



Posted by Matt Madia, 06:13:48 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Senate Moves Bill to Renew Federal Improvement Panel

After Preemption Row, Roof Strength Rule Delayed

Consumers Left in the Dark on Food Safety

Regulatory Attacks on Medicaid Halted

OMB Shutting Out EPA on CO2 Regulation

Bush Regulatory Gatekeepers on House Chopping Block

Lobbyists Opposing FDA Changes

It All Depends on Who You Ask

For Workplace Injuries, Underreporting is under Fire

Tomato Toll in the Thousands, CDC Says

Archived Entries for Environment

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004