In this video, OMB Watch Executive Director Gary Bass discusses the importance of public protections; the Bush administration's track record on such protections; and what the American people can do to take our country back from the big-monied special interests that are endangering our health and safety.

You can also leave comments on our YouTube page with suggestions for future videos.

The Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy at the George Washington University is looking for government scientists to participate in a project which will allow for better understanding of how science is used in policymaking and how the process can be improved:

Scientists in Government is a two-year project whose goal is to promote and shape the public discussion about the rights and responsibilities of government scientists, as part of the larger effort to ensure that government uses the best science to protect and promote the health and well-being of Americans. In order to achieve this goal, we will collect and analyze data on the role and functioning of scientists employed by government agencies; produce a series of reports and policy proposals for future policymakers and government leaders; and communicate the findings and proposals in a manner that facilitates their use by policymakers.

Click here for more information.

Click here if you are a scientists willing to participate.

The Center for Progressive Reform (CPR) has a new paper that cautions against federal climate change legislation that would preempt the efforts of state and local governments to stem greenhouse gas emissions. The paper states, "Federal climate change legislation must reflect the longstanding principle that federal regulation is the 'floor' upon which more stringent state regulation may be built."

In the U.S., state and local governments have been the only parts of the public sector to act on climate change. The CPR paper states, "During almost a decade of federal inaction on climate change, beginning with the Bush Administration's decision to walk away from its campaign promise to participate actively in Kyoto treaty negotiations, state and local governments have led the way in adopting programs to control these harmful emissions." It goes on, "Every state in the country has adopted some kind of policy or law to deal with climate change."

Industry lobbyists often push for explicit preemption in federal law in order to prevent states from imposing more progressive laws and regulations. If industry can control the situation at the federal level and handcuff individual states, it will have shaped public policy for the entire country.

Industry representatives argue, without express preemption, businesses and consumers would have to deal with a "patchwork" of regulations. Uniformity is better, they say. The CPR paper debunks that myth and calls the argument a "smokescreen for deregulation."

The preemption issue is likely to be a sticking point as the Senate debates the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (S. 3036) this week. Gristmill, a leading environmental news blog, says the debate over how to deal with state climate policy will be one of the top four issues likely to ignite controversy on the Senate floor. The other three are "cost containment" (an off-ramp built in to the bill in case the direct economic impacts are viewed as too onerous), nuclear power, and the system for distributing credits under the cap-and-trade system being proposed.

The debate will likely have little practical implications. Disarray among Senate Democrats is so profound that the prospects for passage dwindle each passing day, according to insiders.

A startling article in yesterday's Roll Call (subscription) makes Democratic leaders look like the Bad News Bears of public policy. The article is peppered with quotes from unnamed congressional aides who bear witness to the disorganization and intra-party bickering that has characterized developments surrounding the Climate Security Act. From the article:

"We are about to take up the most important fight of our generation, and we have no strategy, no message and no plan to get out of this," one senior Senate Democratic aide said.

Another senior Senate Democratic staffer echoed those sentiments: "Everyone knows this bill is going nowhere. The president is opposed to it. The House is not inclined toward action on this, and now we're going to spend valuable floor time on a bill that's going nowhere ...