HOME
ABOUT US
OUR ISSUES
Federal Budget
Information & Access
Nonprofit Advocacy
Regulatory Policy
DudleyWatch
Unmet Needs
Paralysis by Analysis
White House Interventions
Special Interests v. Public Interest
National Solutions for National Needs
In Congress
In the Courts
Public Participation
The Bush Record
Reports & Analyses
RegWatch
Resource Center
PRESS ROOM
ACTION CENTER
PUBLICATIONS
THE WATCHER
OUR BLOGS
SIGN UP
Receive news, updates, and alerts!
DONATE
Help support our work
OTHER SITES
FedSpending.org
RTK NET
NPAction
Working Group on Community Right-to-Know
Citizens for Sensible Safeguards
Open the Government
"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR
News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room
Wednesday, March 16, 2005
[V]arious program weaknesses continue to undermine the nation's firewall against BSE. FDA acknowledges that there are more feed manufacturers and transporters, on-farm mixers, and other feed industry businesses that are subject to the feed ban than the approximately 14,800 firms inspected to date; however, it has no uniform approach for identifying additional firms. FDA has not reinspected approximately 2,800, or about 19 percent, of those businesses, in 5 or more years; several hundred are potentially high risk. FDA does not know whether those businesses now use prohibited material in their feed. FDA's feed-ban inspection guidance does not include instructions to routinely sample cattle feed to test for potentially prohibited material as part of the compliance inspection. Instead, it includes guidance for inspectors to visually examine facilities and equipment and review invoices and other documents. Feed intended for export is not required to carry a caution label "Do not feed to cattle or other ruminants," when the label would be required if the feed were sold domestically. Without that statement, feed containing prohibited material could be inadvertently or intentionally diverted back to U.S. cattle or given to foreign cattle. FDA has not always alerted USDA and states when it learned that cattle may have been given feed that contained prohibited material. This lapse has been occurring even though FDA's guidance calls for such communication. Although research suggests that cattle can get BSE from ingesting even a small amount of infected material, inspectors do not routinely inspect or review cleanout procedures for vehicles used to haul cattle feed.
Read the report.
Latest Entries by Theme
All Themes
Enforcement
About This Blog
Rollbacks
Safety
Industry Influence
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Publications
Consumer Issues
Environment
Public Health
Oversight
In the White House
Most Recent Entries for RegWatch
Senate Moves Bill to Renew Federal Improvement Panel
After Preemption Row, Roof Strength Rule Delayed
Consumers Left in the Dark on Food Safety
Regulatory Attacks on Medicaid Halted
OMB Shutting Out EPA on CO2 Regulation
Bush Regulatory Gatekeepers on House Chopping Block
Lobbyists Opposing FDA Changes
It All Depends on Who You Ask
For Workplace Injuries, Underreporting is under Fire
Tomato Toll in the Thousands, CDC Says
Archived Entries for Oversight
June
May
April
March
February
January
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
September, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
April, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
October, 2005
September, 2005
July, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
December, 2004
November, 2004
October, 2004