Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Monday, July 14, 2008

Lawmakers Probe on Occupational Risk Rulemaking

Two lawmakers are attempting to shed light on a mysterious Department of Labor rule that may change the way the federal government looks at occupational health risks. As of now, all we know of the rule is its title: "Requirements for DOL Agencies' Assessment of Occupational Health Risks."

While that may sound innocuous, Reg•Watch is always skeptical when the Bush administration (in this case, DOL brass inside the office of Secretary Elaine Chao) wades into the area of risk assessment. The administration tried in 2006 to attack the federal government's entire risk assessment process — where the nature and severity of occupational, environmental, consumer, or other risks are scientifically studied and described. That proposal was shot down by the National Academies of Science.

On July 10, Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA), chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, and Rep. George Miller (D-CA), chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, wrote a letter to Chao pressing for answers on the rule. The chairmen asked Chao to provide them with several pieces of information by July 17. Among them:

  • "A copy of the proposed regulation;"
  • "The legal authority under which the Department expects to promulgate this regulation;" and
  • The Department's timetable for officially proposing and finalizing the rule.

The rule is currently under review at OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, according to RegInfo.gov, a government website that tracks White House reviews. OIRA reviews rules under the authority of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review.

Usually, RegInfo.gov provides the public with a description of a rule under review, along with purported legal authority, timetables, and an indication of stakeholders the rule may impact. The DOL rule in question provides none of those factoids — only a title.

In their letter, Kennedy and Miller point out, "This action is highly unusual and contradicts the stated purpose of E.O. 12866 which is 'to make the [regulatory] process more accessible and open to the public.' "

Stay tuned to Reg•Watch for updates.



Posted by Matt Madia, 05:15:47 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Controversial Rule on Abortion Moving Forward

Bush Administration Backs Off SCHIP Restrictions

Bush Signs Consumer Product Safety Bill

Bush Administration Cuts Habitat for Spotted Owl

Bush Trying Last-Minute Changes to Endangered Species Act

For EPA Staff Trying to Protect the Planet, "Disappointment is Profound"

Consumer Product Bill Delivers Win for Consumers

Will New FDA Guidelines Really Reduce Conflicts of Interest?

Crane Rule Held Back by Bush Administration Ideology

Senate Passes Product Safety Bill

Archived Entries for Oversight

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

November, 2006

September, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

April, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

October, 2005

September, 2005

July, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004