HOME
ABOUT US
OUR ISSUES
Federal Budget
Information & Access
Nonprofit Advocacy
Regulatory Policy
DudleyWatch
Unmet Needs
Paralysis by Analysis
White House Interventions
Special Interests v. Public Interest
National Solutions for National Needs
In Congress
In the Courts
Public Participation
The Bush Record
Reports & Analyses
RegWatch
Resource Center
PRESS ROOM
ACTION CENTER
PUBLICATIONS
THE WATCHER
OUR BLOGS
SIGN UP
Receive news, updates, and alerts!
DONATE
Help support our work
OTHER SITES
FedSpending.org
RTK NET
NPAction
Working Group on Community Right-to-Know
Citizens for Sensible Safeguards
Open the Government
"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR
News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room
Monday, July 14, 2008
Two lawmakers are attempting to shed light on a mysterious Department of Labor rule that may change the way the federal government looks at occupational health risks. As of now, all we know of the rule is its title: "Requirements for DOL Agencies' Assessment of Occupational Health Risks."
While that may sound innocuous, Reg•Watch is always skeptical when the Bush administration (in this case, DOL brass inside the office of Secretary Elaine Chao) wades into the area of risk assessment. The administration tried in 2006 to attack the federal government's entire risk assessment process — where the nature and severity of occupational, environmental, consumer, or other risks are scientifically studied and described. That proposal was shot down by the National Academies of Science.
On July 10, Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA), chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, and Rep. George Miller (D-CA), chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, wrote a letter to Chao pressing for answers on the rule. The chairmen asked Chao to provide them with several pieces of information by July 17. Among them:
The rule is currently under review at OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, according to RegInfo.gov, a government website that tracks White House reviews. OIRA reviews rules under the authority of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review.
Usually, RegInfo.gov provides the public with a description of a rule under review, along with purported legal authority, timetables, and an indication of stakeholders the rule may impact. The DOL rule in question provides none of those factoids — only a title.
In their letter, Kennedy and Miller point out, "This action is highly unusual and contradicts the stated purpose of E.O. 12866 which is 'to make the [regulatory] process more accessible and open to the public.' "
Stay tuned to Reg•Watch for updates.
Latest Entries by Theme
All Themes
Enforcement
About This Blog
Rollbacks
Safety
Industry Influence
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Publications
Consumer Issues
Environment
Public Health
Oversight
In the White House
Most Recent Entries for RegWatch
Controversial Rule on Abortion Moving Forward
Bush Administration Backs Off SCHIP Restrictions
Bush Signs Consumer Product Safety Bill
Bush Administration Cuts Habitat for Spotted Owl
Bush Trying Last-Minute Changes to Endangered Species Act
For EPA Staff Trying to Protect the Planet, "Disappointment is Profound"
Consumer Product Bill Delivers Win for Consumers
Will New FDA Guidelines Really Reduce Conflicts of Interest?
Crane Rule Held Back by Bush Administration Ideology
Senate Passes Product Safety Bill
Archived Entries for Oversight
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
September, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
April, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
October, 2005
September, 2005
July, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
December, 2004
November, 2004
October, 2004