Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Friday, March 31, 2006

OSHA Continues Block Respirator Fit-Tests for TB
OSHA is continuing to advise its field officers not to enforce the annual respirator fit-test for tuberculosis that has been blocked in the FY 2004 and FY 2005 appropriations bills in a rider offered by Rep. Roger Wicker (R-MS.). This latest advisory is in conflict with a recent CDC report that recommended periodic fit-tests. While the language of the legislation itself blocked the fit tests, the accompanying text said OSHA should wait for the CDC report to decide. Two months after the report, in a memo published on the agency website Mar. 28, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Steven Witt wrote that OSHA will continue to adhere to the appropriations language. According to BNA Daily Report for Executives (subscription-only):
Witt wrote that "even though the CDC guidelines have since been issued and do recommend periodic fit testing, OSHA will adhere to the language actually in the appropriations."

The agency in January said it was reviewing the CDC guidelines to see if the agency's compliance directive should be revised, an OSHA official told BNA Jan. 9.

The latest memo to the field said that there should not be any ongoing inspections or pending or recent citations relating to the annual fit testing of respirators used for TB.

Annual fit testing is a rather simple procedure that ensures that respirator protection (i.e. face masks) still fit properly on the faces of health workers. CDC has found that periodic fit testing is appropriate. What’s more puzzling about OSHA’s stance is that fit testing is still required for other respiratory diseases, such as SARS.

Posted by Genevieve Smith, 03:31:19 PM



Wednesday, March 29, 2006

America's Drinking Water Supply is Vulnerable
How safe is your drinking water five years after 9/11? Apparently not so safe that a couple of high school kids can't break in and have the run of the place:
BLACKSTONE, Massachusetts (AP) -- Authorities charged two teenagers in connection with a break-in at a water facility and expected to charge a third as more than 9,000 area residents waited to hear Wednesday whether their drinking water had been contaminated.

The teens are suspected of cutting the barbed wire at the facility late Monday, cutting lines to an alarm, and then damaging an electrical panel and a vent at the top of a 1.3-million-gallon water storage tank, said Blackstone Police Lt. Gregory Gilmore.

A 5-gallon container with an odor was found on top of the tank, but authorities do not yet know what, if anything, was put into the water. . . .

"We know for sure that when they tampered with the vent cover at the top of the tower some debris had fallen into the water supply," Gilmore said.

[Via CNN.com - U.S.]

All this time after 9/11 and the homeland is still unsecured.

Posted by Robert Shull, 11:39:03 AM



Monday, March 27, 2006

Chemical (In)security
Despite the security rhetoric pushed by the administration since 9/11, our rail systems, which transport 1,7 million shipments of hazardous materials each year, remain dangerously vulnerable to a terrorist attack, according to the New York Times.
Since 9/11, railroads have spent millions to install fences and security cameras and add additional officers around the state, but industry officials concede that their facilities are far too large to be completely sealed. Leaders of railroad workers' unions say it is not uncommon for tanker cars to be left unattended for days, and that security along the rails is frighteningly inadequate. And the sight of graffiti-covered tank cars filled with deadly gases is a reminder of the holes in the security system.

State and local officials say they are limited in what they can do to regulate the thousands of tank cars of deadly gases hauled around New Jersey each year. In other cities and states, proposals to reroute dangerous chemicals away from major population centers, most notably in Washington, D.C., have faced fierce opposition and legal challenges from both the railroads and local communities where the chemicals would be rerouted. The courts have also upheld the railroads' assertion that only the federal government can regulate rail traffic.

Moreover, the toxic cargo transported by railroads means an attack could be devastating; a Navy study cited in the article predicts that a single car of chlorine near a densely populated area could kill as many as 100,000 people.”

Just as troubling, a drill conducted last year by the U.S. government and involving hundreds of public officials and private corporations revealed major flaws in communication and preparedness. According to the New Jersey Media Group:

"It was a testament to how unprepared people really are," said Wilmer Alvarez, a director at Columbia University's National Center for Disaster Preparedness. "The mistakes that occurred caused almost a complete shutdown of the public health system. They tested the public health system and it got ransacked."

As the one-year anniversary of the drill -- known as TopOff3 -- approaches, neither the state nor federal government has issued final reports detailing the problems -- or successes -- of the terror simulation. But interviews with government officials and expert observers in recent weeks have drawn parallels to the much-maligned federal response to Hurricane Katrina.

Despite this disturbing evidence that we are woefully unprepared should another attack occur, DHS has made little progress on chemical security, according to a recent GAO report.

Read more about our unmet security needs.
Read more about 04:21:42 PM



Friday, March 24, 2006

Another Way of Looking at Public Protections
From the latest issue of Rachel's Democracy & Health News:
What is government for? It is to protect the commons, all the things we own together and none of us owns individually, such as air, water, wildlife, the human gene pool, the accumulated human knowledge that we each inherit at birth, and more. Can protecting the commons be expressed in a simple set of guidelines? Here's a start...
Read Carolyn Raffensperger, Ten Tenets: The Law of the Commons of the Natural World, Rachel's Democracy & Health News, No. 847, Mar. 23, 2006


Posted by Robert Shull, 11:57:17 AM



Thursday, March 02, 2006

Cop off the Beat
The latest NYTimes article on MSHA should come as no surprise to anyone who has followed this administration's enforcement record; the Bush administration has reduced penalties for mine safety violations in order to better relations with industry. From the article:
In its drive to foster a more cooperative relationship with mining companies, the Bush administration has decreased major fines for safety violations since 2001, and in nearly half the cases, it has not collected the fines, according to a data analysis by The New York Times.

Federal records also show that in the last two years the federal mine safety agency has failed to hand over any delinquent cases to the Treasury Department for further collection efforts, as is supposed to occur after 180 days.

The article also notes that the much-touted achievement of reduced deaths cited by the administration and industry as justification for their lax enforcement is largely a result of greater mechanization of mining processes rather than an actual increase in safety precautions, meaning those miners who do have to put themselves in harm's way are no safer than they were before.

Posted by Genevieve Smith, 03:47:33 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Is the Bush Administration Meddling with Risk Assessments?

White House Blocks Effort to Clean Up Pesticide Containers

Senate Moves Bill to Renew Federal Improvement Panel

After Preemption Row, Roof Strength Rule Delayed

Consumers Left in the Dark on Food Safety

Regulatory Attacks on Medicaid Halted

OMB Shutting Out EPA on CO2 Regulation

Bush Regulatory Gatekeepers on House Chopping Block

Lobbyists Opposing FDA Changes

It All Depends on Who You Ask

Archived Entries for Safety

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004