HOME
ABOUT US
OUR ISSUES
Federal Budget
Information & Access
Nonprofit Advocacy
Advocacy Blog
Charities and National Security
Elections and Issue Advocacy
Lobbying and Speech Rights
Nonprofit Voter Mobilization
Rights of Gov't Grantees
Research
General Nonprofit Issues
Archives
Regulatory Policy
PRESS ROOM
ACTION CENTER
PUBLICATIONS
THE WATCHER
OUR BLOGS
SIGN UP
Receive news, updates, and alerts!
DONATE
Help support our work
OTHER SITES
FedSpending.org
RTK NET
NPAction
Working Group on Community Right-to-Know
Citizens for Sensible Safeguards
Open the Government
Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy
Friday, February 18, 2005
They are already developing workshops, training seminars and open houses in an effort to increase outreach to these groups.
The question remains whether this really helps faith-based groups. Were the grants open to faith-based groups previously? What are the regulations that would prohibit a faith-based organization from applying for one of the grants? And, the biggest question of all, is there enough money to go around?
While the administration touts the faith-based initiative as a way to ensure faith-based organizations access to funding, in many cases, the new budget proposing cutting the very funds that the organizations would apply for.
Wednesday, February 16, 2005
Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania say federal funding of the Firm Foundation program at the Bradford County Correctional Facility violates the Constitution by funneling public money to a program that proselytizes and hires only Christians. Over 90 percent of the budget for the program comes from federal, state and local funds.
For more information.
On the Scott-Van Hollen-Woolsey amendment, debate lasted almost two hours and was very spirited. Ultimately, the amendment was defeated 19-23. Among dems, Miller was not present for the vote, and Barrow voted no.
On the McCarthy amendment that would require WIA-funded employers seeking to use the exemption in H.R. 27 to indicate on job applications that applicants might not be hired on the basis of merit, the amendment was defeated 17-27. Among the dems, Miller, Owens, Holt and Hinojosa were not present for the vote, and Barrow noted no.
Latest Entries by Theme
All Themes
Faith-Based Initiative
Church Electioneering
Nonprofit Accountability
Charitable Giving
Speech and Lobbying Rights
Grants Streamlining
Charities and Security
General
Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog
Controversial Rule on Abortion Moving Forward
Treasury Again Disregards Concerns with the Anti-Terrorism Financing Guidelines
Civil Liberties Group Sues North Carolina Board of Elections Challenging Total Ban on Lobbyist Contributions
Court Rules Anti-prostitution Pledge Requirement Unconsitutional
New Edition of Tax Guide for Churches and Religious Organizations
Nonprofit in New Mexico Told to Register as PAC
Voter Machine Flaws Will Not Be Corrected By Election Day
New Form 990 Instructions Available
New Voter Rights Project Provides Access to Legal Documents
FEC Seeks New Judge Assignment
Archived Entries for Faith-Based Initiative
July
February
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
August, 2006
June, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
October, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
December, 2004