Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Statement: Law Meant to Regulate 'Sham' Issue Ads Instead Silences Citizens Groups
On Sept. 25, 2006 the AFL-CIO, Chamber of Commerce, National Education Association and OMB Watch issued a statement about the impact of McCain-Feingold's "electioneering communications" rule on grassroots lobbying campaigns. The statement notes that Sept. 8, 2006 marked the beginning of a 60-day pre-election blackout period for broadcasts by nonprofits, unions and business corporations to air a message that simply asks citizens to contact representatives in Congress to vote yes or no on a bill.

The statement notes that the Federal Election Commission (FEC) recently deadlocked on a proposal to exempt grassroots lobbying broadcasts from this overly broad campaign finance rule. The issue has been contentious because some reform groups have opposed any exemption to the rule.

The statement challenges opponents of protection for grassroots lobbying broadcasts to debate the issue on the merits, saying:

These "reform" groups make no effort to offer a constructive proposal to distinguish grassroots lobbying from campaign ads. Instead, they make dire predictions about "huge loopholes" and impugn the integrity of organizations that collectively represent tens of millions of ordinary citizens. Nor do they offer any argument about how a reasonable grassroots lobbying exemption could be abused. In fact, during 2004, charities and religious organizations were entirely exempt from the "electioneering communications" rule, and the record is clear that no "abuse" occurred.
See the full text of statement


Posted by Kay Guinane, 02:50:45 PM



Friday, September 15, 2006

OpEd Says IRS Must Explain Its Actions in NAACP Case
Prof. Frances Hill, a law professor at the University of Miami and Tax Policy Program Director at the Campaign Legal Center has called on the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to do a better job of explaining its policies and procedures that enforce the ban on partisan activity by charities and religious organizations. For the full text see OpEd for the Chronicle on Philanthropy.
The official end of the Internal Revenue Service's investigation of the NAACP was as inexplicable as its beginning. Even though the organization was cleared of allegations that it had violated federal law on partisan campaigning, the way the group was treated raises important issues about how the government handles matters involving tax-exempt groups, especially the right of charities to influence public policy.


Posted by Kay Guinane, 12:03:11 PM



Thursday, September 14, 2006

IRS Revokes Exempt Status of Operation Rescue West
IRS Announcement 2006-69, released Sept. 11, states that the tax-exempt status of Youth Ministries, Inc., d/b/a Operation Rescue West, has been revoked. The statement does not give a reason, but a statement of Catholics for Free Choice says:
On September 11, 2006, the IRS announced that it had revoked the nonprofit 501(c)(3) status of Youth Ministries, Inc., which did business as Operation Rescue West (ORW). While the IRS does not provide information on the circumstances that lead to revocations of any group’s tax-exempt status, a CFFC complaint filed in 2004 provided information on ORW’s electoral activities during the Boston Democratic Party convention that we considered to be violations of IRS regulations.

Our complaint referred to a full-page ad placed by the antichoice group on July 15, 2004, in the Wanderer, an ultra-conservative national Catholic weekly. In the ad, ORW called on readers to make what it said was a “tax-deductible donation to help pay the bills and affect the outcome of the election” and called for readers to give a tax-deductible donation to help “defeat [John Kerry] in November and enable President Bush to appoint a pro-life Supreme Court Justice to finally overturn Roe v. Wade.” In making its case, Operation Rescue West cited the statements of several cardinals and bishops who had attacked Catholic politicians for their support of a woman’s right to choose and invited the support of readers as they are “going into the middle of a war in Boston.” [Emphasis in original.] ORW said that the money raised would be spent in Boston during the Democratic Party convention, where it planned to distribute antiabortion, anti-Kerry materials and display highly visible ads on trucks at key sites.

The Operation Resuce West website does not have a statement posted at this time. However, a spokesperson told BNA that the group will continue to operate, although contributions will no longer be tax-deductible.


Posted by Kay Guinane, 03:55:48 PM



Thursday, September 07, 2006

More Documents from IRS Audit Released by NAACP
The NAACP used the Freedom of Information Act to find out what was in the IRS file on the agency's investigation into alleged prohibited partisan speech by the NAACP. The NAACP released the first batch of documents to the public in May (for more see the May 31, 2006 version of the OMB Watcher

To see all 1,715 pages in the second batch of documents click here.

Posted by Kay Guinane, 02:42:38 PM



Tuesday, September 05, 2006

11 Worst Places to (try) to Vote in U.S.
This is an excellent roundup of the new generation of voting barriers. See the Sept./Oct. 2006 issue of Mother Jones
We used to think the voting system was something like the traffic laws -- a set of rules clear to everyone, enforced everywhere, with penalties for transgressions; we used to think, in other words, that we had a national election system. How wrong a notion this was has become painfully apparent since 2000: As it turns out, except for a rudimentary federal framework (which determines the voting age, channels money to states and counties, and enforces protections for minorities and the disabled), U.S. elections are shaped by a dizzying mélange of inconsistently enforced laws, conflicting court rulings, local traditions, various technology choices, and partisan trickery...

Here is a list -- partial, but emblematic -- of American democracy's more glaring weak spots.






Friday, September 01, 2006

Federal Court Blocks Ohio Law Restricting Nonprofit Voter Education Drives
From a Sept. 1, 2006 Brennan Center press release
CLEVELAND, OH - A federal court in Cleveland blocked enforcement of an Ohio state law enacted earlier this year that would have imposed crippling requirements on voter registration groups. The plaintiffs, civic and religious organizations and voting rights groups that have been working in Ohio through many election cycles without government interference, say that the law had dramatically curtailed their efforts to help eligible voters get on the rolls....

The plaintiffs contested a procedure required by the Ohio Secretary of State that would have changed the process for returning voter registration forms collected by non-partisan civic groups conducting voter registration drives. In the past, citizens working to register voters were able to turn in the completed forms to a civic group or church that would review the forms for accuracy, turn them into the registrar, and follow up later to make sure the voter was actually registered. The rule enjoined today would have made it a crime to designate one person to hand in the forms collected in a drive; each volunteer or worker would have had to go personally to the election offices to deliver every form collected.

Plaintiffs also successfully argued that rules that require online training excluded low-income citizens and civic groups who don't have computers, as well as individuals with disabilities.



Posted by Kay Guinane, 04:38:14 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Hearing on FEC Nominees

FISA Negotiations Continue

Librarians on the Hill to Discuss FISA and Other Issues

Forum on Rules for Tax-Exempt Organizations during an Election Year

Federal Trade Commission Seeks Authority Over 501(c)(3) Groups

Reid Seeks Help from the White House for Separate Hans von Spakovsky Vote

IRS May Consider Project to Monitor Political Activity of 501(c)(4)s

Young Adults Voting at Record Levels this Primary Season

Missouri Lawmakers Want to Require Proof of Citizenship to Vote

Group Seeks Court Test of IRS Electioneering Ban

Archived Entries for Elections and Issue Advocacy

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004