Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Friday, February 23, 2007

Amicus Brief in Wisconsin Right to Life Case

Rick Hasen and three others have written an amicus brief supporting the Federal Election Commission (FEC) in the Wisconsin Right to Life case urging the Supreme Court to reverse the lower court ruling.

The district court erred in its most recent opinion by applying a poorly tailored and constitutionally tone-deaf test for separating electioneering communications likely to influence voters' choices in federal elections from those unlikely to have such an effect. It would permit corporate use of treasury funds for speech that falls within the core of the constitutional justifications for BCRA's regulation.

However, Bob Bauer disagrees in his blog www.moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com. The brief offers an as-applied exemption for issue advertising - whether the ad has an "appreciable effect on voters' choices in a federal election," which Bauer argues is too limited. The political circumstances immediately before an election are used to justify the threat to an organization's right to broadcast grassroots lobbying communications, as is protected by the First Amendment. OMB Watch plans to file an amicus brief as done in November 2005.



Posted by Amanda Adams, 03:01:57 PM



FEC Rulemaking Priorities

The Federal Elections Commission (FEC) plans to complete work on nine new regulations this year. The list of priorities includes revising ethics regulations, and implementing congressional changes that limit the use of campaign funds to pay for flights on private air travel. Another new regulation will address "hybrid ads," meaning ads referring to a federal candidate with a party reference. According to BNA Money and Politics; ($$)

FEC Vice Chairman David Mason and Democratic Commissioner Weintraub also discussed other items they would like to see addressed but did not press for them. Mason said that "in an ideal world," he would like to see the FEC consider revision of its current regulation defining "express advocacy." Weintraub said she would like to see the agency work on a new rule tackling the issue of "bundling" campaign contributions, but she said she recognized that this would be difficult with all the other matters the FEC is set to address this year.



Posted by Amanda Adams, 02:50:51 PM



Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Focus On FEC Coordination Rule with an Early 2008 Presidential Race

BNA Money and Politics ($$) reports today on the latest in the clash between the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) and the sponsors of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA). Reps. Christopher Shays (R-CT) and Martin Meehan (D-MA) have warned the FEC that what we might see before the 2008 elections are federal candidates relying on corporations, unions, or wealthy individuals to supply unlimited funding for advertising early in the 2008 race. Shays and Martin Meehan have filed a lawsuit objecting to these coordination rules. This is the third lawsuit Shays and Meehan have brought against the FEC, making the case known as Shays III. They have also introduced legislation (H.R. 421) that would eliminate the FEC and replace it with an entirely new agency.

In the 2008 presidential race, the tougher restrictions will not take effect until September, 120 days before the first presidential caucus in Iowa set for next January. Until then, according to critics, the FEC rule allows a presidential candidate to write an ad script, avoiding express advocacy, and send it to a corporation, union, or wealthy individual backer to pay the entire cost of production and air time. That result, critics contend, violates the fundamental legal prohibition against companies and unions financing federal campaigns and the principle that individual contributions to candidates should be limited.



Posted by Amanda Adams, 03:09:25 PM



Thursday, February 15, 2007

May 31 Deadline for Shays v. FEC

According to BNA Money and Politics ($$), a federal judge has set the end of May as a deadline to complete briefing in the ongoing litigation between the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and Representatives Shays and Meehan. Shays and Meehan reject the FEC's refusal to write a rule on the activities of all 527 groups and the FEC's plan to consider possible campaign finance violations on a case by case basis looking at the actions of each organization.

"Upon consideration of the parties' recommendations for further proceedings, and in view of the urgent nature of the matter, the Court orders the parties to comply with the following briefing schedule regarding defendant's supplemental Explanation and Justification," Sullivan's order said. The order called for all briefing to be completed by May 31, with a possible court hearing after that date.



Posted by Amanda Adams, 12:43:35 PM



Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Shays and Meehan Uphold Fight to Regulate 527 Groups

On February 1, the FEC defended its plan of not issuing a ruling on 527 organizations. In response, Representatives Shays (R-Conn.) and Meehan (D-Mass.) have filed court papers expressing their plans to insist that a federal judge order the FEC to write rules for 527s. The FEC will respond in a February 16 court filing. The lawyers for Shays and Meehan are seeking a schedule to conclude by Mid-May, but the FEC is looking towards mid-July. Given the urgency of the 2008 presidential campaign, groups continue to face legal questions, which a ruling would help subside. According to BNA Money and Politics ($$):

The FEC has said that an "explanation and justification" of its handling of Section 527 groups released Jan. 31 should satisfy an order handed down by Sullivan last March and end the litigation with Shays and Meehan. Sullivan had ordered the FEC either to write a new rule regulating 527s or better explain why it has not done so. The latest FEC document cited regulations adopted by the commission in late 2004 that govern when an organization becomes an FEC-regulated "political committee." The FEC also pointed to several recent enforcement cases in which a half-dozen organizations were cited for violating the FEC rules governing political committees.



Posted by Amanda Adams, 12:05:38 PM



Friday, February 09, 2007

Enforcement Hearings Approved

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) yesterday unanimously approved a new eight month pilot program that was proposed in November allowing those facing campaign finance enforcement charges to argue their case directly to the FEC commissioners. The commissioners would then vote after these secret meetings whether or not there is "probable cause" in the case. More information can be read in this FEC press release.



Posted by Amanda Adams, 04:52:56 PM



Thursday, February 08, 2007

First Amendment Restoration Act

Representative Bartlett (R-MD) has introduced H.R. 71, the First Amendment Restoration Act. This bill would repeal the "electioneering communication" provision in the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. The "electioneering communication" ban prohibits labor unions, corporations, and nonprofits from sponsoring broadcast advertisements that have any reference to a federal candidate 30 days before a primary election and 60 days before a general election. Bartlett's press release references the Wisconsin Right to Life case that the Supreme Court will hear April 25. As proponents of nonprofit speech rights, OMB Watch is in full support of an exemption for legitimate grassroots communications from the "electioneering communication" ban. Bartlett is quoted in the press release;

The 30-60 day BCRA provision eviscerates the central purpose of the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech — the protection of political speech. This legislation would simply repeal this provision. . . . The 30-60 day provision abridges Americans' First Amendment rights. These are rights and a guarantee for self-government that must be restored to all Americans.

Technorati Profile

Posted by Amanda Adams, 01:48:52 PM



Thursday, February 01, 2007

The FEC Position on 527 Organizations

The Federal Elections Commission (FEC) has released a draft justification of its political committee status; or why 527 organizations are not regulated as political committees. The agency is defending itself for not issuing a rule defining "political committee" and arguing that the rules adopted in 2004 are adequate. These 2004 rules will be used to determine whether any group is working solely to influence federal elections without abiding by federal campaign finance restrictions. This document confirms the FEC's contention that a 527 organization can not be considered a political committee simply based on tax status alone. "An organization's election of section 527 tax status is not sufficient evidence in itself that the organization satisfies FECA and the Supreme Court’s contribution, expenditure, and major purpose requirements." The FEC gives the recent examples of the 527 organizations that were just fined extensively for its activity in the 2004 campaign.

Pursuant to FECA and Supreme Court precedent, the Commission will continue to determine political committee status based on whether an organization (1) received contributions or made expenditures in excess of $1,000 during a calendar year, and (2) whether that organization’s major purpose was campaign activity.

Read reactions to the FEC's explanation at these blogs: skepticseye.com and moresoftmoneyhardlaw.



Posted by Amanda Adams, 05:38:09 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Hearing on FEC Nominees

FISA Negotiations Continue

Librarians on the Hill to Discuss FISA and Other Issues

Forum on Rules for Tax-Exempt Organizations during an Election Year

Federal Trade Commission Seeks Authority Over 501(c)(3) Groups

Reid Seeks Help from the White House for Separate Hans von Spakovsky Vote

IRS May Consider Project to Monitor Political Activity of 501(c)(4)s

Young Adults Voting at Record Levels this Primary Season

Missouri Lawmakers Want to Require Proof of Citizenship to Vote

Group Seeks Court Test of IRS Electioneering Ban

Archived Entries for Elections and Issue Advocacy

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004