HOME
ABOUT US
OUR ISSUES
Federal Budget
Information & Access
Nonprofit Advocacy
Advocacy Blog
Charities and National Security
Elections and Issue Advocacy
Lobbying and Speech Rights
Nonprofit Voter Mobilization
Rights of Gov't Grantees
Research
General Nonprofit Issues
Archives
Regulatory Policy
PRESS ROOM
ACTION CENTER
PUBLICATIONS
THE WATCHER
OUR BLOGS
SIGN UP
Receive news, updates, and alerts!
DONATE
Help support our work
OTHER SITES
FedSpending.org
RTK NET
NPAction
Working Group on Community Right-to-Know
Citizens for Sensible Safeguards
Open the Government
Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy
Wednesday, November 23, 2005
"The government should not be in the business of silencing Americans who are perceived to be critical of certain policy decisions," said ACLU Senior Staff Attorney Chris Hansen, who is the lead counsel in this case. "The president should be willing to be in the same room with people who might disagree with him, especially at a public, taxpayer-funded town hall."
For background on the incident.
Friday, November 18, 2005
In a move hailed as freeing the Internet from regulation, the Federal Election Commission ruled Nov. 17 that a company operating "unabashedly progressive" blogs is eligible for the "press exemption" from campaign finance limits.
The FEC commissioners voted unanimously in an open meeting to approve an advisory opinion (AO 2005-16) requested by Fired Up! LLC, a company founded by prominent Democrats that says its blogs will explicitly support and seek contributions for federal candidates. The FEC said Fired Up! should be considered a "press entity" because its "core" activities involved providing news and commentary.
The ruling still leaves another major issue for the FEC--whether to apply campaign finance limits to financing of paid political advertising on the Internet. The FEC has a pending proposed rule that would regulate in this area. Meanwhile, Congress is considering legislation that would prevent the FEC from defining any online messages about federal candidates as "public communications" subject to regulation.
The decision to provide bloggers with the same press exemption for FEC rules long enjoyed by members of the traditional media represented a "powerful statement," according to Michael Toner, the FEC's Republican vice chair. Toner said the action recognized that it was the goal of the Federal Election Campaign Act "to protect the media in all its forms." He noted that the law has long guaranteed the right of any media outlet to discuss political campaigns and even endorse candidates, so long as it is not controlled by a candidate or political party.
Read the draft advisory opinion
Thursday, November 03, 2005
At stake is the ability of legal service providers who receive some federal LSC funding to use their non-federal dollars to provide certain important services, such as representing clients in class action lawsuits, claiming court-ordered attorneys’ fee awards, or providing assistance to certain categories of legal immigrants. Under the challenged rule, programs would have to establish physically separate offices and hire new staff to do such work -- even if they pay for those cases with money from non-federal sources. This “physical separation requirement” imposes a severe burden on the plaintiff legal services programs, which struggle to find funding to meet the needs of their clients.
We will post more information on the oral argument as we receive it.
Latest Entries by Theme
All Themes
Faith-Based Initiative
Church Electioneering
Nonprofit Accountability
Charitable Giving
Speech and Lobbying Rights
Grants Streamlining
Charities and Security
General
Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog
Hearing on FEC Nominees
FISA Negotiations Continue
Librarians on the Hill to Discuss FISA and Other Issues
Forum on Rules for Tax-Exempt Organizations during an Election Year
Federal Trade Commission Seeks Authority Over 501(c)(3) Groups
Reid Seeks Help from the White House for Separate Hans von Spakovsky Vote
IRS May Consider Project to Monitor Political Activity of 501(c)(4)s
Young Adults Voting at Record Levels this Primary Season
Missouri Lawmakers Want to Require Proof of Citizenship to Vote
Group Seeks Court Test of IRS Electioneering Ban
Archived Entries for Speech and Lobbying Rights
May
April
March
February
January
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
December, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
December, 2005
November, 2005
October, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
January, 2005
December, 2004
November, 2004