Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Troubling Report Recommends Increased Watch List Use to Check Nonprofits

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) released a report on the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) function to identify instances in which charitable organizations may be linked to terrorist-related activities. The report, Screening Tax-Exempt Organizations' Filing Information Provides Minimal Assurance That Potential Terrorist-Related Activities Are Identified, calls on the IRS to use the consolidated Terrorist Screening Center (TSC) list as opposed to manually reviewing all tax-exempt documents and comparing the information with the Treasury list maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). Meanwhile, use of the OFAC list by private companies for similar screening has caused innocent people to be flagged as terrorists. Why then should the IRS expand its screening program when problems with the lists have already been identified? The report highlights the claim that the "use of charities and nonprofit organizations is a significant source of alleged terrorist activities." Yet, Treasury has never provided documentation to back up its claims that the charitable sector is a significant source of terrorist financing. In response to the TIGTA report, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) wrote a letter to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson expressing his concern.

Baucus' letter states:
TIGTA investigators found that the current IRS screening process has never identified any person or organization with links to terrorists and that the agency is using a system that is, at best, woefully inefficient. IRS personnel told TIGTA that they primarily look for "Middle Eastern sounding names" when considering which tax filings to flag for further review.

For more information, see this article from the latest Watcher.



Posted by Amanda Adams, 05:13:23 PM



Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Treasury Sued to Release Documents on False Positives in Terrorist Watch Lists
On May 16 the Laweyrs Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area filed a complaint against t he U.S. Department of Treasury in federal court to force compliance with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking information on inquiries about names on the terrorist watch list.

In its press release the group origninally filed its FOIA request in August 2005, and noted:

"An increasing number of private companies, including banks, mortgage companies, car dealerships, health insurers, landlords and employers screen consumers names against the OFAC list...Consumers discover the OFAC list when they are told that they cannot make a purchase, open an account or do business because their name appears on a terror list."

The complaint notes that Treasury has no process for removing names placed on the list erroneously, or for distinguishing common names similar to thoseon the list. Their March 2007 report documents the inaccuracies and discriminatory impact of the list.

For more information see this AP article




US, EU Grantmaker Groups Publish Accountability Principles for International Philanthropy
The Council on Foundations (COF) and the European Foundation Center have published Principles of Accountability for International Philanthropy, the result of a two-year consultative process of grantmakers and stakeholders from four continents. The COF press release announcing the document says:

Voluntary and aspirational, the Principles and accompanying Practices aim to guide and support funders in making better decisions in pursuing their international missions and objectives, and to provide a framework that will encourage and assist more foundations to get involved internationally....

The document encompasses seven concise Principles based on an identified set of core values that foundations should aspire to embrace. They address integrity; understanding; respect; responsiveness; fairness; cooperation and collaboration; and effectiveness. They seek to fill a specific niche and complement activities undertaken in Europe and the United States that deal with broader issues of accountability, effectiveness and good practice. The Principles are a living document that will be reviewed and updated periodically.

While the document does not specifically address ways to protect against diversion of charitable resources to terrorists, it is similar the Principles of International Charity published by a group of U.S. nonrprofits in March 2005 as an alternative to the problematic Treasury Department Guidelines.

Posted by Kay Guinane, 12:30:18 PM



Friday, May 11, 2007

Charity Sues Yale University Press

KinderUSA, a Muslim-American charity has filed a lawsuit on April 26 against Yale University Press over a book, Hamas: Politics, Charity, and Terrorism in the Service of Jihad, which accuses it as being a front for terrorist groups like Hamas. The book was written by Matthew Levitt, who directs a program on intelligence, terror, and policy at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and both are named as co-defendants in the lawsuit.

Part of the suit focuses on text that states; "The formation of KinderUSA highlights an increasingly common trend: banned charities continuing to operate by incorporating under new names in response to designation as terrorist entities or in an effort to evade attention. This trend is also seen with groups raising money for al-Qaeda." The footnote to this paragraph mentions two officers of KinderUSA and continues with a discussion of al-Qaeda funding networks, without informing the reader that there is no allegation that KinderUSA is tied to al-Qaeda.

The charity has asked the university press and the Washington Institute for Near East Policy to issue a public retraction, but both have refused. Yale Press stated that they did not do fact-checking; however they are now aware of the inaccuracy and continue to distribute the book. Read the complaint here



Posted by Amanda Adams, 05:56:01 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Hearing on FEC Nominees

FISA Negotiations Continue

Librarians on the Hill to Discuss FISA and Other Issues

Forum on Rules for Tax-Exempt Organizations during an Election Year

Federal Trade Commission Seeks Authority Over 501(c)(3) Groups

Reid Seeks Help from the White House for Separate Hans von Spakovsky Vote

IRS May Consider Project to Monitor Political Activity of 501(c)(4)s

Young Adults Voting at Record Levels this Primary Season

Missouri Lawmakers Want to Require Proof of Citizenship to Vote

Group Seeks Court Test of IRS Electioneering Ban

Archived Entries for Charities and Security

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

May, 2005