HOME
ABOUT US
OUR ISSUES
Federal Budget
Information & Access
Nonprofit Advocacy
Advocacy Blog
Charities and National Security
Elections and Issue Advocacy
Lobbying and Speech Rights
Nonprofit Voter Mobilization
Rights of Gov't Grantees
Research
General Nonprofit Issues
Archives
Regulatory Policy
PRESS ROOM
ACTION CENTER
PUBLICATIONS
THE WATCHER
OUR BLOGS
SIGN UP
Receive news, updates, and alerts!
DONATE
Help support our work
OTHER SITES
FedSpending.org
RTK NET
NPAction
Working Group on Community Right-to-Know
Citizens for Sensible Safeguards
Open the Government
Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) released a report on the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) function to identify instances in which charitable organizations may be linked to terrorist-related activities. The report, Screening Tax-Exempt Organizations' Filing Information Provides Minimal Assurance That Potential Terrorist-Related Activities Are Identified, calls on the IRS to use the consolidated Terrorist Screening Center (TSC) list as opposed to manually reviewing all tax-exempt documents and comparing the information with the Treasury list maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). Meanwhile, use of the OFAC list by private companies for similar screening has caused innocent people to be flagged as terrorists. Why then should the IRS expand its screening program when problems with the lists have already been identified? The report highlights the claim that the "use of charities and nonprofit organizations is a significant source of alleged terrorist activities." Yet, Treasury has never provided documentation to back up its claims that the charitable sector is a significant source of terrorist financing. In response to the TIGTA report, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) wrote a letter to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson expressing his concern.
Baucus' letter states:TIGTA investigators found that the current IRS screening process has never identified any person or organization with links to terrorists and that the agency is using a system that is, at best, woefully inefficient. IRS personnel told TIGTA that they primarily look for "Middle Eastern sounding names" when considering which tax filings to flag for further review.
For more information, see this article from the latest Watcher.
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
In its press release the group origninally filed its FOIA request in August 2005, and noted:
"An increasing number of private companies, including banks, mortgage companies, car dealerships, health insurers, landlords and employers screen consumers names against the OFAC list...Consumers discover the OFAC list when they are told that they cannot make a purchase, open an account or do business because their name appears on a terror list."
The complaint notes that Treasury has no process for removing names placed on the list erroneously, or for distinguishing common names similar to thoseon the list. Their March 2007 report documents the inaccuracies and discriminatory impact of the list.
For more information see this AP article
Voluntary and aspirational, the Principles and accompanying Practices aim to guide and support funders in making better decisions in pursuing their international missions and objectives, and to provide a framework that will encourage and assist more foundations to get involved internationally.... The document encompasses seven concise Principles based on an identified set of core values that foundations should aspire to embrace. They address integrity; understanding; respect; responsiveness; fairness; cooperation and collaboration; and effectiveness. They seek to fill a specific niche and complement activities undertaken in Europe and the United States that deal with broader issues of accountability, effectiveness and good practice. The Principles are a living document that will be reviewed and updated periodically.
The document encompasses seven concise Principles based on an identified set of core values that foundations should aspire to embrace. They address integrity; understanding; respect; responsiveness; fairness; cooperation and collaboration; and effectiveness. They seek to fill a specific niche and complement activities undertaken in Europe and the United States that deal with broader issues of accountability, effectiveness and good practice. The Principles are a living document that will be reviewed and updated periodically.
While the document does not specifically address ways to protect against diversion of charitable resources to terrorists, it is similar the Principles of International Charity published by a group of U.S. nonrprofits in March 2005 as an alternative to the problematic Treasury Department Guidelines.
Friday, May 11, 2007
KinderUSA, a Muslim-American charity has filed a lawsuit on April 26 against Yale University Press over a book, Hamas: Politics, Charity, and Terrorism in the Service of Jihad, which accuses it as being a front for terrorist groups like Hamas. The book was written by Matthew Levitt, who directs a program on intelligence, terror, and policy at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and both are named as co-defendants in the lawsuit.
Part of the suit focuses on text that states; "The formation of KinderUSA highlights an increasingly common trend: banned charities continuing to operate by incorporating under new names in response to designation as terrorist entities or in an effort to evade attention. This trend is also seen with groups raising money for al-Qaeda." The footnote to this paragraph mentions two officers of KinderUSA and continues with a discussion of al-Qaeda funding networks, without informing the reader that there is no allegation that KinderUSA is tied to al-Qaeda.
The charity has asked the university press and the Washington Institute for Near East Policy to issue a public retraction, but both have refused. Yale Press stated that they did not do fact-checking; however they are now aware of the inaccuracy and continue to distribute the book. Read the complaint here
Latest Entries by Theme
All Themes
Faith-Based Initiative
Church Electioneering
Nonprofit Accountability
Charitable Giving
Speech and Lobbying Rights
Grants Streamlining
Charities and Security
General
Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog
Hearing on FEC Nominees
FISA Negotiations Continue
Librarians on the Hill to Discuss FISA and Other Issues
Forum on Rules for Tax-Exempt Organizations during an Election Year
Federal Trade Commission Seeks Authority Over 501(c)(3) Groups
Reid Seeks Help from the White House for Separate Hans von Spakovsky Vote
IRS May Consider Project to Monitor Political Activity of 501(c)(4)s
Young Adults Voting at Record Levels this Primary Season
Missouri Lawmakers Want to Require Proof of Citizenship to Vote
Group Seeks Court Test of IRS Electioneering Ban
Archived Entries for Charities and Security
May
April
March
February
January
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
December, 2006
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
December, 2005
November, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
May, 2005