Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Friday, February 29, 2008

Leap Day Laugh: Don't Miss This!

Laughter is the key to survival in advocacy or politics, so don't miss this video "news" on The Onion website: Diebold Accidentally Leaks Results of 2008 Election Early.

See it here: War for the White House

Maybe it would be funnier if it was posted on April 1….

Posted by Kay Guinane, 12:26:22 PM



Wednesday, February 27, 2008

PEPFAR Reauthorization Bill Includes Pledge Requirement for HIV/AIDS Grantees

A mark up hearing was held today (February 27) on a compromise bill introduced this morning, the Global HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Reauthorization Act of 2008, that will expand upon the law passed in 2003. The United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Act (PL 108-25) prohibits grants to any group that "does not have a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking."

CQ ($$) reports that a "Democratic draft that had been circulating for nearly a month threatened to raise a longstanding social-policy feud, with Bush's global AIDS plan — one of his few overseas initiatives to win broad bipartisan support — hanging in the balance. It pitted Democrats pushing to get rid of the abstinence-only requirements and family planning restrictions against Republicans who say the changes would funnel money to abortionists overseas." The draft bill eliminated the anti-prostitution requirement.

Unfortunately, the compromise HR 5501, that passed out of committee maintains the requirement that groups receiving grant money have a specific policy opposing prostitution and sex trafficking. Such a pledge gives the government the right to dictate the speech and activities it does not fund.



Posted by Amanda Adams, 03:54:54 PM



Friday, February 15, 2008

New IRS Fact Sheets

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has released two important fact sheets for tax exempt organizations. One is on the IRS complaint process, and the other is on the examination and compliance checks process. The referral form to make a complaint against a tax exempt organization can be found here.



Posted by Amanda Adams, 04:58:39 PM



Wednesday, February 13, 2008

OMB Watch up for Online Advocacy Award

Do you like OMB Watch? Would you like to boost our fragile self-esteem? Then please vote for us in the Golden Dot Awards, presented annually for excellence in online campaigning by the Institute for Politics, Democracy & the Internet at George Washington University.

OMB Watch has been nominated for Best Issue Advocacy Blog. The nomination is for all three of our blogs: Advocacy Blog, Budget Blog, and Reg•Watch.

Vote here: polc.ipdi.org/GoldenDots/voting.htm

(OMB Watch has the utmost respect for the other candidates and has vowed to run a clean campaign.)



Posted by Matt Madia, 05:23:53 PM



Monday, February 11, 2008

Check out This Great Tutorial to Be Ready for the Election

An online tutorial has been created on how to engage with congressional level politics, leading a step by step tour through web sites. For example, the tutorial starts with the fundamentals; "Can I Vote?" directs the visitor to their state's Secretary of State's web site, and then if they need to register, another site is also provided. Subsequently the next web sites include biographical information on the candidates and members of Congress, candidate platforms, incumbent voting records, and campaign contributions.

This is a very valuable resource that exemplifies how the Internet can increase civic engagement. The companion article to the tutorial, "Tech Tools for the American Voter and the 2008 Congressional Elections", clearly states the purpose of such a tool; "All Americans have a civic responsibility to vote for the national, state, and local leaders who will make the decisions that affect us, our families, our community, and our nation now and well into the future. To vote responsibly requires that we learn about the candidates." The article points out resources and tools that can be used to make informed decisions on whom to elect to office. One resource mentioned is Fedspending.org launched in 2006 by OMB Watch. "OMBWatch.org believes that it is essential to know how the 'government spends money so that citizens can hold elected officials accountable for the national priorities they set."

Check out the tutorial here.



Posted by Amanda Adams, 04:06:23 PM



Friday, February 08, 2008

How are the Candidates Going to Help the Nonprofit Sector?

A blog posting titled "Bird-Dogging and Blogging the Primaries" observes that "until now, it would have seemed implausible that nonprofits and presidential politics would go hand-in hand. Activism is ubiquitous in communities; yet, on the whole the organizations that facilitate and conduct it are ignored by policy makers and politicians." The blog is promoting the new V3 campaign which shows candidates' responses to questions regarding the nonprofit sector created by Robert Egger. The campaign encourages nonprofit advocates around the country to ask candidates for local, state and federal office what their plans are to work with and support the nonprofit community. According to the V3 website; "The V3 Campaign will give you the tools you need to legally engage candidates in your city and state to determine their plans for the nonprofit sector. Learn how the candidates plan to support the causes and strengthen the organizations that are important to you."



Posted by Amanda Adams, 12:56:12 PM



Thursday, February 07, 2008

Join the 2008 Election Discussion

The Chronicle of Philanthropy will be hosting an online discussion next Tuesday February 12, at noon, Eastern time on the election and what it means for nonprofits. Experts on philanthropy and politics will be answering questions and if a question is submitted in advance, there is a better chance that it will be answered during the discussion. To submit a question, click here. The discussion is open to everyone, not just subscribers, so go ahead and ask a question!



Posted by Amanda Adams, 05:44:47 PM



Wednesday, February 06, 2008

California Bill Would Require Foundations to Disclose Detailed Information in the name of Diversity

Last week the California Assembly passed a bill that would require big foundations ($250 million in assets and more) to disclose the race, gender and sexual orientation of their board, staff, and even grantees and business contracts. The bill is now headed to the State Senate. The Chronicle of Philanthropy ($$) outlines what is included in the bill.

  • The number of grants and percentage of dollars going to organizations where at least 50 percent of the board, of staff members, are members of ethnic minorities, or are lesbians, gays, bisexuals, or transgender people.
  • A breakdown of the number of grants and percentage of dollars that go to organizations that serve different ethnic groups or sexual orientations, as well as the percentage of contracts awarded to businesses owned by members of those groups.

Reportedly, the measure was put forth by the Greenlining Institute, a public-policy organization in Berkeley that says foundations are too secretive about their giving and not enough awards go to organizations led by minorities. Many have come out in opposition, arguing that it would result in burdensome reporting requirements, and violate privacy rights.

For example this LA Times opinion piece claimed that if the Bush administration were to propose such a measure; "The criticism would be swift and unambiguous: This is absurdly intrusive and a violation of privacy. Foundations would organize to oppose any such legislation. . . . Imagine being the employee who has to ask each co-worker about his or her sexual identity and history. Many of these foundations have relatively small staffs; there won't be many secrets if this bill becomes law."

An editorial in the Wall Street Journal reports that the Greenlining Institute has already begun lobbying House Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-NY) for Congressional hearings. Orson Aguilar, associate director of the Greenlining Institute, was quoted in the Chronicle of Philanthropy article to say this "is just the first step in the group's plans to get lawmakers involved. 'We're definitely going to be putting pressure on Congress and the new [president] to look at this,' he said."



Posted by Amanda Adams, 12:15:25 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Hearing on FEC Nominees

FISA Negotiations Continue

Librarians on the Hill to Discuss FISA and Other Issues

Forum on Rules for Tax-Exempt Organizations during an Election Year

Federal Trade Commission Seeks Authority Over 501(c)(3) Groups

Reid Seeks Help from the White House for Separate Hans von Spakovsky Vote

IRS May Consider Project to Monitor Political Activity of 501(c)(4)s

Young Adults Voting at Record Levels this Primary Season

Missouri Lawmakers Want to Require Proof of Citizenship to Vote

Group Seeks Court Test of IRS Electioneering Ban

Archived Entries for General

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

April, 2006

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005