Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Friday, September 09, 2005

Monthly Budget Review Predicts Higher Deficits

The Congressional Budget Office released their Monthly Budget Review this week, in which they noted that for the first eleven months of this fiscal year (which ends Sept. 30), the government ran a deficit of $352 billion. For various reasons, including that fact that corporate receipts were up due to specifics in certain expiring tax laws, this deficit is $85 billion less than the deficit run at this time last year. These facts have allowed President Bush to claim that he is on track to cutting the deficit in half by 2009 (one of his many campaign promises).

The reality is, the Hurricane Katrina disaster will affect deficit levels for 2006. The CBO report states that deficits will not be greatly affected for FY 2005 because we only have one month to go; however they do mention "substantially greater costs will be incurred in fiscal year 2006."

It looks like we can expect deficits to be on the rise again in the year to come. The administration is not to blame for the fact that the disaster will have a negative effect on the FY 2006 deficit. However, the administration is to blame for our deficits being so high in the first place. In 2004 the budget deficit was $412 billion, and most of that was due to Bush's massive tax cuts. Now we are being forced to engage in deficit-financed spending because of the recent disaster, and the administration can claim that they had no control over what is sure to be a very high deficit figure next year. If not for their prior policies, however, our deficits would have never been so high in the first place.



Posted by Becky Lewis



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

CBO Projects Largest Deficit in History

The Cost of TARP, Dollars and Opportunity

House Approves, Bush Signs Bailout Bill

Timely CTJ Report Pushes for Reagan Tax Proposal

FedSpending.org Will Blow Your Mind

Senate Approves Bailout; Cost "Impossible" to Predict

Interesting Perspectives on the Bailout

Senate Attempts to Sweeten Bailout Bill

Under the Radar: Congress Finishes FY 2009 Approps

Next Move After House Fails to Pass Wall Street Bailout Uncertain

Archived Entries for Federal Tax Policy

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004

June, 2004

January, 2004

December, 2003

November, 2003

September, 2003

August, 2003

July, 2003