HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Wednesday, October 12, 2005

Tax Panel Talks Specifics at Yesterday's Meeting

The President's Advisory Panel on Tax Reform met yesterday in anticipation of their November 1 deadline for submitting tax code recommendations to the Treasury Department. In the meeting the panel referenced some loose conclusions they have come to regarding tax reform, mainly concerning the alternative minimum tax as well as deductions for homeownership and employer-provided health insurance.

While the panel still has a few weeks before they will be submitting formal recommendations (which Bush may or may not choose to consider), they have basically come to a consensus that it would be a good idea to cap both the employee income exclusion for employer provided health care as well as the mortgage interest deduction for homeowners. There was discussion of capping employer-provided health insurance at $11,000 per employee, and mortgage interest deduction at $350,000 (for a couple filing jointly). Former GOP Senator and Chairman of the Panel Connie Mack said that the deductions as they currently exist are not shared equally, and that by pursuing caps in both areas it would result in "shifting some of the benefit to middle-income Americans."

Much of the reason why the panel is interested in pursuing these reforms is because the decreased deductions would help to offset the cost of repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), which was created to ensure that all extremely wealthy individuals would pay some taxes, but is increasingly ensnaring upper- and middle-income Americans. AMT repeal, which would cost about $11.3 trillion over ten years, was deemed to be a necessary reform by the panel months ago, however it was only at yesterday's meeting that they laid out any sort of options to offset to the cost of repeal.

At yesterday's meeting the panel also recommended expanding tax breaks for charitable donations, and rejected the idea of replacing the income tax with a sales tax or a value added tax, both of which would unnecessarily complicate the tax code while placing a disproportionate financial burden on low-income families.

The panel will meet once more publicly on October 18, and meet later in the month via teleconference before submitting their recommendations. They are slated to disband November 15.

New York Times: "Tax Panel Says Popular Breaks Should Be Cut"



Posted by Becky Lewis



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

TARP: Additional Actions Needed to Better Ensure Integrity, Accountability, and Transparency

TARP Oversight Continues Down Bumpy Road

It's Now Officially a Recession

Happy Thanksgiving!

A Few Trillion More Than 700 Billion

Competitive Sourcing Continues to Fail

Friendly Advice

Better News for Workers

Legistorm Launches Searchable Earmarks Website

Oversight Coming to a TARP Near You?

Archived Entries for Federal Tax Policy

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004

June, 2004

January, 2004

December, 2003

November, 2003

September, 2003

August, 2003

July, 2003