Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Monday, December 19, 2005

Guidance v. Blindness: Another Example

BNA's Daily Report for Executives is reporting on two OSHA standards interpretations just posted this month that address employer responsibilities for asbestos and bloodborne pathogens:
Peggy Teeling of Clifton Park, N.Y., asked OSHA what an employer's obligation is to an asbestos worker who quits and moves to another job. Teeling wanted to know if the employee is entitled to the "actual full report" of the examination conducted under the medical surveillance program for asbestos, or whether a clearance or summary report would be acceptable.

Enforcement Director Richard Fairfax replied that under OSHA's construction asbestos standards, the employer must provide a copy of the physician's written opinion within 30 days of its receipt.

In answer to Teeling's question on whether workers are entitled to a copy of their mask fit test when they leave the job, Fairfax said that under 29 CFR 1910.134, the written material must be made available on request to the affected employees for examination and copying. He also noted that employers are required to establish and retain written information about respirator fit testing.

Gary E. Thomas of Marietta, Ohio, asked OSHA whether an employer must provide another series of hepatitis vaccine shots if a worker's blood test shows there is no longer a detectable titer.

The OSHA standard requires that the employers make the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series available to all employees who have had an exposure incident as well as post-exposure follow-up.

Fairfax said, however, that neither a new series of shots nor a hepatitis B vaccination booster is currently required under the current U.S. Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's guidelines.

"The CDC has said that vaccine-induced antibodies to HBV decline gradually over time, and less than or equal to 60 percent of persons who initially respond to vaccination will lose detectable antibodies over 12 years," Fairfax said. "Studies among adults have demonstrated that, despite declining serum levels of antibody, vaccine-induced immunity continues to prevent clinical disease or detectable viremic HBV infection. Therefore, booster doses are not considered necessary."

This is the kind of valuable information that businesses and the public alike need to be able to rely on agencies to produce. The OMB Proposed Bulletin on "Good Guidance Practices" would add new burdens to this kind of guidance, which in some cases could even mean full notice and comment. The OMB bulletin could create new disincentives to the publication of such valuable information to the public, with the result that we could all be left in the dark.

Posted by Robert Shull



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Industry Ties Bind FDA Advisors

Right Whale Protection Rule Finally Here

Industry Pressuring EPA to Weaken Lead Rule

EPA Won't Keep Rocket Fuel out of Water

Roof Strength Rule Delayed Again

Bush Taking Credit for Whale Rule He Delayed

What Should the U.S. Do about China's Bad Milk?

Did OMB Block Asbestos Cleanup in Montana Town?

Whale Protection Rule Clears White House, 573 Days Later

EPA Just Kidding Around on Children's Health

Archived Entries for In the White House

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

August, 2004