HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Tuesday, August 31, 2004

The energy industry, big money, and bad policy

The missing link between the power industry and the Bush administration’s “energy policy”—that is, its habit of distorting environmental and other regulatory policies to favor polluting power companies—is, according to the Dallas Morning News, the usual: money. Specifically, campaign contributions, and power industry executives who bundle together many individual contributions into one fat package. This story comes with a scorecard:

Power industry executives who are also major Bush donors:
  • Dwight Evans, Southern Co.
  • Erle Nye, TXU
  • Thomas Kuhn, Edison Electric Institute
  • Don Jordan, Centerpoint Energy (formerly Reliant)
  • Ron Letbetter, Centerpoint Energy
  • Jim Rogers, Cintergy
  • Anthony Alexander, FirstEnergy Co.
  • James Klauser, Wisconsin Energy
  • Haley Barbour, ex-industry lobbyist (now Mississippi’s governor)
Bush administration policies that favor the power industry
  • Access to the secretive White House energy task force, chaired by Vice President Dick Cheney
  • A policy change to expand the loophole that allowed old coal-fired plants to avoid complying with modern anti-pollution regulations
  • The Bush campaign promise to regulate carbon dioxide emissions: reneged
  • Inadequate rules to address mercury emissions

From Wayne Slater,“ Energy Firms Buy Bush Favors, Critics Say,” Dallas Morning News, Aug. 30, 2004

Posted by Robert Shull



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Endangered Species Rule Sealing Bush Legacy on Warming

Bush Administration Politicos Will Stick Around

Rules of the Road: DOT Puts Truck Drivers and Motorists at Risk

Last-Minute Rule Allows More Dirty Oil Production

Recommendations on Regulatory Reform for the Next President and Congress

Bush Handing over Wilderness to Oil and Gas Industry

New Rule Likely to Cut Health Care for the Poor

For High Court, High Stakes Case on Preemption

Watching out for Midnight Regulations

FDA Experts Fought Rule to Protect Drug Makers

Archived Entries for Industry Influence

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004