HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Wednesday, February 01, 2006

One Disconnect Among Many

In his State of the Union address last night, the President asked Congress to make his 2001 and 2003 taxcuts permanent, and told the American people this would make the economy even stronger. In the very same speech he mentioned efforts to "stay on track to cut the deficit in half by 2009."

There is an obvious disconnect between these two statements. While the President attempts to "cut the deficit in half" by shaving bits and pieces from the already-meager pool of funding available for non-defense discretionary programs, he is advocating an action that will have a cost larger than most people can even wrap their heads around. Making the tax cuts permanent and extending alternative minimum tax relief would have the nation facing large and growing deficits every year for the next ten years. Total deficits, the Congressional Budget Office Estimates, would be between $3.5 and $4 trillion over that period, which hardly indicates that Bush will be cutting budget deficits in half any time soon.

Bush's assertion that he can cut the deficit in half while extending the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts simply does not add up. Last night he spoke of fiscal crisis and "unprecedented strains on the federal government." Those strains are not going to go away, nor will the government's need to spend on both discretionary and entitlement programs. Extending the tax cuts will only drive the country further into debt, and will do nothing to help cyclical budget deficits.



Posted by Becky Lewis



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Orszag to head up OMB?

Change We Can Believe In?

Grassley Asks Treasury IG to Look Into Tax Rule Change

Time to Get Tough on the Swiss

Treasury Overrides Congress Through Fiat, Giving Banks $140 Billion in Tax Breaks

House Definitely Maybe Returning for Lame-Duck Session

Paulson: Troubled Asset Relief Program Will Not Buy Troubled Assets

Trust But Verify

Treasury Releases TARP Transaction, First Tranche Reports

TARP Accounting: More than One Way to Follow the Law?

Archived Entries for Federal Tax Policy

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004

June, 2004

January, 2004

December, 2003

November, 2003

September, 2003

August, 2003

July, 2003