Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Monday, March 06, 2006

Affordable Housing Fund Provision in Senate; No Anti-Advocacy Provision

From National Low Income Housing's Memo to Members:

On February 16, Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) introduced S. 2319, the Hurricane Recovery Act of 2006. The bill includes, among other things, language that would establish an Affordable Housing Fund with a percentage of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s profits.

The bill includes ten titles, responding to needs created by the 2005 hurricanes in the areas of health, housing and community rebuilding, financial services, small business, higher education, tax breaks and incentives, as well as recommendations for improving transparency and accountability during the recovery and relief and future evacuations of individuals with special needs.

Within the Housing and Community Rebuilding Title is a section that would, similar to H.R. 1461, the Federal Housing Finance Reform Act of 2005, establish an Affordable Housing Fund (AHF) from a percentage of the profits of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two of the Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE). The funds would be used for the production, preservation and rehabilitation of rental housing and homeownership, for extremely-low and very-low income families.

Unlike the AHF in H.R. 1461 that passed the House floor on October 26 (see Memo, 10/28), S. 2319 does not include any restrictive anti-voting provisions. Other compromises made to appease the Republican Study Committee included in the final House bill, such as a five year sunsetting of the AHF, a requirement that 25% of the fund be used to satisfy part of the existing Treasury obligation to pay interest on REFCorp bonds, and a prohibition against allowing funds awarded to a nonprofit entity to be redistributed to other nonprofit entities, are not included in Senator Obama’s bill.



Posted by Jennifer Lowe



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Citizens United Again Denied Relief from Donor Disclosure Law

FEC Complaints Against DSCC Ads

Very Troubling Proposed HHS Rule Places Restrictions on Funding

OMB Watch and Grantmakers Without Borders Releases "Collateral Damage: How the War on Terror Hurts Charities, Foundations, and the People They Serve"

Maryland State Police Accused of Spying on Peace Activists

Almost Half of the Senate Co-Sponsor of Campaign Finance Disclosure Bill

New LDA Guidance, Again

Some Hiccups in Implementing New Ethics Law

Hostility towards Voter Registration?

FISA Amendments Act of 2008 Signed Into Law

Archived Entries for Speech and Lobbying Rights

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004