Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Friday, September 24, 2004

House Committee Finds FDA Failed to Warn Public About Danger


FDA officials have had indicators that antidepressants could increase suicidality in children since as early as 1996, according to testimony given in front of the House Energy Commerce Committee yesterday by senior officials from the FDA’s Office of Drug Evaluation. However, rather than acting with caution, the FDA chose to forestall strong warnings on the use of antidepressants in children, despite the fact that most clinical trials have shown that antidepressants are no more effective than placebos in treating child depression. Rebukes for the FDA’s failures came from both sides of the fence yesterday as lawmakers reprimanded the FDA officials for failing to protect the public health of Americans.

Testimony also revealed that FDA senior officials may have suppressed and softened the conclusions of one of their senior medical investigators, Dr. Andrew Mosholder, who found last year a strong connection between antidepressants and suicidality in children. The FDA did not let the doctor present his findings in front of an advisory committee meeting in February, but rather had another doctor present the results of the clinical trials without the Dr. Mosholder’s conclusions.

The FDA rationalized their decision to suppress the information by saying that they did not want the advisory committee to think that the findings were the FDA’s official conclusions. “We thought it was potentially dangerous to the public to present a premature conclusion to the public,” stated Dr. Robert Temple, director of FDA’s Office of Drug Evaluation I. Several congressmen questioned why the advisory committee, comprised of medical professionals, would not be able to understand the complexities and uncertainties of the study even if the general public could not.

“What was the harm in allowing Mosholder an opportunity to present his data?” asked Committee Chairman Joe Barton. FDA did not allow Dr. Mosholder to present his results until September, after his findings were corroborated by outside experts at Columbia University and by an FDA medical examiner.

After seeing the full results this September, the advisory committee voted 15-8 for strong “black-box” warnings on antidepressants. The House committee repeatedly accused the FDA of weakening past recommendations of the advisory committee and questioned whether the FDA would actually follow the most recent recommendations. Though Dr. Temple promised a decision on the warning label within a few days, the committee certainly did not get the reassurance that they were looking for: “I’m not predicting that we won’t go with the black-box warning,” Temple responded. At the same time, he also indicated that he did not believe that the 15-8 vote was a clear majority and that the FDA would look at the rationales of the votes when weighing the decision.



Posted by Genevieve Smith



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Industry Ties Bind FDA Advisors

Right Whale Protection Rule Finally Here

Industry Pressuring EPA to Weaken Lead Rule

EPA Won't Keep Rocket Fuel out of Water

Roof Strength Rule Delayed Again

Bush Taking Credit for Whale Rule He Delayed

What Should the U.S. Do about China's Bad Milk?

Did OMB Block Asbestos Cleanup in Montana Town?

Whale Protection Rule Clears White House, 573 Days Later

EPA Just Kidding Around on Children's Health

Archived Entries for Safety

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004