"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

Friday, October 01, 2004

So much for bio-terror preparedness -- or the consumer

Yeah, you might think that.

Latest example in which you might think that but then would be wrong: country-of-origin labeling of seafood:

Today was the deadline for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to issue the final rules for "country of origin" labeling (COOL) for seafood. Under proposed rules, seafood sold in grocery stores would be labeled with the seafood's country of origin, as well as whether it is farmed-raised or wild. Instead, the USDA will delay the rules' effective date for six months to allow "industry members to conform their operations to the new [labeling] requirements."

This is likely not what the industry will spend the next six months doing, however. It probably will follow the lead of the food and grocery industry, which is lobbying Congress to change the program to a voluntary standard. For other foods, including meat, COOL has been delayed until 2006 by Congress. . . .

The United State bans the use of particular chemicals (many of them dangerous to consumers' health) to farm-raise seafood, but other countries permit them. As recent as Sept. 28, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration found residues of one such U.S.-banned chemical - chloramphenicol - in a shipment of shrimp from Vietnam. Currently, only 1 to 2 percent of all seafood imported into the United States is inspected. COOL labeling would allow consumers to know if the seafood is farm-raised in countries with less stringent public health regulations.

Consumers have a right to know where their food comes from, but in the United States, we blindly eat meals every day without knowing or having any way to find out. Given that we know where our clothes and cars are made, it seems logical that we should also know the same information about our food.