Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Does The IRS Have It Out For Poor Americans?

Just this morning I stumbled across this enlightening report released earlier this year from the folks up at Syracuse University who run the TRAC database. (For those who don't follow arcane data analysis groups as closely as OMB Watch does, TRAC is the Transactional Record Access Clearinghouse - a data gathering and analysis group that uses the Freedom of Information Act to access and analyze government information. See them at http://trac.syr.edu.)

The report shows that the tax returns of Americans earning over $1 million a year are the least likely to be audited by the IRS. Using the lastest available data from the federal government, TRAC found only 30 out of 180,000 returns showing over $1 million in income in 2004 were audited face-to-face. The report also found that Americans making less than $25,000 per year were six times more likely to be audited face-to-face than those making over $200,000 per year. Even when the more common "correspondence" audits are included, poor taxpayers were still more than twice as likely to be audited.

With the recent news that the IRS intends to drastically reduce its estate and gift tax division, a pattern appears to be emerging out of the government's revenue collection agency - a pattern that indicates it is easier for the rich to avoid paying taxes. Considering wealthy Americans already have both more incentive and more means to manipulate the tax code to their advantage, logic seems to dictate higher income returns should be reviewed more, not less, than low-income ones.

Does the IRS really need to go farther and make it even easier for the rich to cheat on their taxes?



Posted by Adam Hughes



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

CBO Projects Largest Deficit in History

The Cost of TARP, Dollars and Opportunity

House Approves, Bush Signs Bailout Bill

Timely CTJ Report Pushes for Reagan Tax Proposal

FedSpending.org Will Blow Your Mind

Senate Approves Bailout; Cost "Impossible" to Predict

Interesting Perspectives on the Bailout

Senate Attempts to Sweeten Bailout Bill

Under the Radar: Congress Finishes FY 2009 Approps

Next Move After House Fails to Pass Wall Street Bailout Uncertain

Archived Entries for Federal Tax Policy

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004

June, 2004

January, 2004

December, 2003

November, 2003

September, 2003

August, 2003

July, 2003