HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Friday, August 04, 2006

Reading the Tea Leaves

The defeat of the "trifecta" last night bodes well for those opposed to gutting the estate tax. This threat to the long-term fiscal health of the nation, has been staved off - for now. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) voted "Nay" on cloture to reserve to the right to reconsider this bill in September. While passage of an estate tax cut remains highly in doubt, there is a non-zero chance that this zombie legislation will be resurrected by Frist.

I thought it would be interesting take a look at what some of the reactions from yesterday's vote to perhaps have a glimpse the future - especially from those Senator's targeted by the bill's, umm, inducements:

Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR): "I cannot ignore our $300 billion deficit, and the ongoing costs to support the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and reconstruction in the Gulf Coast."

Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-HI)(BNA sub. req'd): "I am talking about opposing cloture on a bill that would mortgage future generations by adding more than $300 billion to already alarming federal deficits."

Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH): "Repealing the estate tax, which would cost $267 billion from 2007 to 2016, would be incredibly irresponsible when we must fund the war, secure the homeland and when we know the tidal wave of entitlements are coming due. The numbers just don’t add up."

I would say that the "vulnerable" Senators who Frist thought he could persuade to pile on more debt, have thought better of this irresponsible tax scheme, and it's hard to imagine that Pryor, Akaka, or Voinovich would change his mind and decide that $750 billon of revenue loss is somehow conducive to fiscal sanity.



Posted by Craig Jennings



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Notes from the Economy: Unemployment

Obama Selects Chief Performance Officer

Business Tax Cuts as Stimulus: Somewhat Less Than Effective

CBO 2009 Deficit Projection Tops $1 Trillion

Gates Opines on 2009 War Spending

Details of New House Rules Package

The Case for Tax Cuts in the Recovery Package

Economic Package Details Coming Into View

Douglas Elmendorf Tapped as CBO Chief

Commission Proposals Being Pushed From Day 1

Archived Entries for Estate Tax

December, 2008

November, 2008

September, 2008

August, 2008

July, 2008

June, 2008

March, 2008

February, 2008

January, 2008

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

November, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

January, 2005

July, 2004

June, 2004

May, 2004

April, 2004

March, 2004

February, 2004

January, 2004

December, 2003

November, 2003

October, 2003

July, 2003