Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Thursday, August 10, 2006

Dems Question IRS Downsizing

House Democrats are challenging a recent move by the IRS to downsize its estate tax auditing department (More here and here). Rep. John Olver (D-MA) just threw his hat into the ring, too. From BNA (subscription required):

Olver expressed "strong concern" despite IRS's assertions that the change is due to the declining number of returns as a result of a bigger exemption.

The Massachusetts Democrat pointed out that estates of more than $2 million are still subject to the tax.

"I am greatly concerned that this sudden and substantial personnel reduction will cripple the ability of the IRS to detect tax cheating among the wealthiest estates," Colvert said in an Aug. 1 letter to Commissioner of Internal Revenue Mark Everson.

IRS has taken significant heat from Congress since it announced July 24 that it intends to offer voluntary retirements to 157 of the 343 existing estate tax attorneys who audit estate and gift tax returns.

Olver asked Everson to delay the personnel reductions "until it can be definitively shown that the IRS will enhance and not weaken its current efforts" in the estate tax area." In fact, he said, "I believe that the IRS should increase, not decrease, its audit coverage in this area."

On July 28, 25 other House Democrats sent a letter to IRS Commissioner Mark Everson questioning the decision. From BNA again:

Reps. John Lewis (D-Ga.), ranking member of the Oversight Subcommittee, and Earl Pomeroy (D-N.D.), a senior panel member, said they fear IRS may not be devoting adequate resources to compliance in this area.

Taking a more urgent tone, 23 House Democrats said in another letter to Everson that IRS should rethink the decision at once.

"We have serious concerns about this significant shift in tax collection policy and request that you immediately delay this decision until Congress has adequate time to review your plan," said the lawmakers, led by Rep. Steven Rothman (D-N.J.) and including Ways and Means member Rep. Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.).....

"We cannot understand why you would want to eliminate auditors from a division that is not only the most productive, but also, according to your agency, where there is a growing need for audits," the Rothman group said.

BNA: Olver Criticizes IRS Decision to Reduce Attorneys Working on Estate Tax Audits

BNA: Decision to Reduce Estate Tax Auditors Not Political, Everson Insists at Hearing



Posted by Matt Lewis



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Notes from the Economy: Jobs and Unemployment

Transparency Act Legacy Spreads to the States

Talk of a Lame Duck Session

Bush Admin Helps Out Big Beef

Bush Admin Takes Aim at Unionization

CBPP: Taxes on the Rich Don't Hurt Small Businesses

A Swing and a Miss on Tax Evasion

Forthcoming: EPI's The State of Working America, 2008/2009

The Executive Pay Pie: Extra Large Slices and Topped with Tax Subsidies

A Bridge for Sale: Contracting Problems Continue

Archived Entries for Government Performance

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004