Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Statement: Law Meant to Regulate 'Sham' Issue Ads Instead Silences Citizens Groups

On Sept. 25, 2006 the AFL-CIO, Chamber of Commerce, National Education Association and OMB Watch issued a statement about the impact of McCain-Feingold's "electioneering communications" rule on grassroots lobbying campaigns. The statement notes that Sept. 8, 2006 marked the beginning of a 60-day pre-election blackout period for broadcasts by nonprofits, unions and business corporations to air a message that simply asks citizens to contact representatives in Congress to vote yes or no on a bill.

The statement notes that the Federal Election Commission (FEC) recently deadlocked on a proposal to exempt grassroots lobbying broadcasts from this overly broad campaign finance rule. The issue has been contentious because some reform groups have opposed any exemption to the rule.

The statement challenges opponents of protection for grassroots lobbying broadcasts to debate the issue on the merits, saying:

These "reform" groups make no effort to offer a constructive proposal to distinguish grassroots lobbying from campaign ads. Instead, they make dire predictions about "huge loopholes" and impugn the integrity of organizations that collectively represent tens of millions of ordinary citizens. Nor do they offer any argument about how a reasonable grassroots lobbying exemption could be abused. In fact, during 2004, charities and religious organizations were entirely exempt from the "electioneering communications" rule, and the record is clear that no "abuse" occurred.
See the full text of statement

Posted by Kay Guinane



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Citizens United Again Denied Relief from Donor Disclosure Law

FEC Complaints Against DSCC Ads

Very Troubling Proposed HHS Rule Places Restrictions on Funding

OMB Watch and Grantmakers Without Borders Releases "Collateral Damage: How the War on Terror Hurts Charities, Foundations, and the People They Serve"

Maryland State Police Accused of Spying on Peace Activists

Almost Half of the Senate Co-Sponsor of Campaign Finance Disclosure Bill

New LDA Guidance, Again

Some Hiccups in Implementing New Ethics Law

Hostility towards Voter Registration?

FISA Amendments Act of 2008 Signed Into Law

Archived Entries for Elections and Issue Advocacy

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004